ATL: DEBBY - Post-Tropical

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
stormhunter7
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 762
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 3:13 pm
Location: Panama City Beach, Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#1561 Postby stormhunter7 » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:19 pm

0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#1562 Postby ROCK » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:20 pm

SouthFloridawx wrote:The center is going to continue to reform under intense convection, until conditions are a little better. I think the Panhandle is a pretty safe bet for landfall.



maybe.....but the EURO which is far the best model we have says otherwise. Still a split camp. I dont think anyone can assume any one place on the GOM is a place for landfall.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

#1563 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:21 pm

Best Track position.
Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

User avatar
Dave
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 13442
Age: 74
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:57 pm
Location: Milan Indiana
Contact:

#1564 Postby Dave » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:21 pm

000
URNT15 KNHC 231916
AF302 01AAA INVEST HDOB 22 20120623
190900 2456N 08823W 9732 00282 0049 +240 +233 264020 020 011 002 00
190930 2456N 08821W 9736 00278 0049 +240 +233 261020 020 011 002 00
191000 2456N 08819W 9735 00278 0048 +240 +234 260020 020 010 002 00
191030 2455N 08817W 9733 00279 0048 +240 +231 258021 022 014 001 00
191100 2455N 08815W 9736 00276 0047 +240 +232 259023 023 017 001 00
191130 2455N 08814W 9736 00275 0047 +240 +232 256024 024 015 002 00
191200 2454N 08812W 9733 00278 0047 +240 +232 255023 023 017 002 00
191230 2454N 08810W 9734 00278 0047 +240 +236 255024 024 016 002 00
191300 2454N 08808W 9734 00279 0047 +240 +235 252023 024 012 002 00
191330 2454N 08806W 9737 00275 0046 +240 +234 254024 024 018 002 00
191400 2454N 08804W 9739 00273 0045 +240 +236 251025 025 018 002 00
191430 2454N 08802W 9735 00276 0045 +240 +233 251024 024 016 002 00
191500 2454N 08800W 9734 00275 0045 +240 +232 251024 025 019 002 00
191530 2454N 08758W 9736 00274 0044 +240 +231 249026 027 020 002 00
191600 2454N 08756W 9737 00273 0044 +243 +228 247027 028 021 002 00
191630 2454N 08754W 9734 00275 0044 +241 +230 245028 028 022 003 00
191700 2454N 08752W 9735 00273 0043 +242 +228 245028 029 021 002 00
191730 2454N 08751W 9735 00274 0043 +245 +222 244029 030 022 002 00
191800 2455N 08749W 9739 00271 0043 +242 +230 241028 029 023 001 00
191830 2455N 08747W 9732 00276 0043 +242 +230 242029 029 022 001 00
$$
;
0 likes   

WeatherGuesser
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2672
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 6:46 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#1565 Postby WeatherGuesser » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:24 pm

stormhunter7 wrote:Navy had TS Debby http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/TC.html :)


Just noticed that. 04L.Debby
0 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re:

#1566 Postby Evil Jeremy » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:24 pm

gatorcane wrote:Still hard not to go with the rest of the models ECMWF/UKMET/CMC/NOGAPS which send this west.


CMC doesn't bring it west anymore, it's pretty much north on the 12z run. And GFDL joined GFS. The models are everywhere.
0 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17

User avatar
Dave
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 13442
Age: 74
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:57 pm
Location: Milan Indiana
Contact:

#1567 Postby Dave » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:25 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re:

#1568 Postby ROCK » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:25 pm

gatorcane wrote:What the GFS thinks will send this system to East is seen starting to materialize in this WV loop. Look at the upper-left corner of the screen and you can see another trough and associated low getting ready to swing through the northern Great lakes.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/eaus/loop-wv.html

You can see in the 12Z GFS run (500MB layer) that in 48 hours how this low creates a big weakness along the eastern coast of the United States. High pressure is sitting over Oklahoma with good ridging to NW of the 96L that has moved north into the North-Central GOM. Tropical systems take the path of least resistance which would send it NE or ENE not west:

http://weather.unisys.com/gfs/gfs.php?i ... n=us&t=48h

Still hard not to go with the rest of the models ECMWF/UKMET/CMC/NOGAPS which send this west.





the GFS spits out a weakness because Debby gives birth to Ernesto.....
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11162
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: Re:

#1569 Postby Ivanhater » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:26 pm

Evil Jeremy wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Still hard not to go with the rest of the models ECMWF/UKMET/CMC/NOGAPS which send this west.


CMC doesn't bring it west anymore, it's pretty much north on the 12z run. And GFDL joined GFS. The models are everywhere.


Yes, Canadian is Biloxi/Mobile
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#1570 Postby gatorcane » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:27 pm

Certainly looks to me the LLC is moving further away from the MLC/convection to the east which is move NNE. Could it be that the LLC moves west and stays weak but the main energy gets shunted to the NE over Florida? I am starting to wonder if the GFS has had this right all along the more I look at things today. The problem is that the ECMWF really consolidates this in the next 24-48 hours. I just can't see that happening with the strong shear from the ULL in the NW GOM that does not seem to be dissipating. It appears the ECMWF may not be handling that feature properly. The UKMET overdoes ridges and the CMC has shifted to the right...

What a win for the GFS if it verifies.....
Last edited by gatorcane on Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:29 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#1571 Postby Air Force Met » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:27 pm

Ikester wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:Do you all think the NHC will pull the trigger at 5?


More than likely. The NHC at 2pm already gave multiple clues that they were considering it. "Per buoy...Sat. data and preliminary recon data...." That tells me right there they just need confirmation of a closed center. If they find it, it's Debby.


I think you meant to say a well defined closed center. The center is certainly closed. There is NO DOUBT about that.

And for the record...I do not see how they DON'T upgrade it at 4...other than the fact it's Avila working the desk. This is a TS.
0 likes   

Chris_in_Tampa
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5075
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:06 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re:

#1572 Postby Chris_in_Tampa » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:29 pm

Dave wrote:GE is running a little slow...hopefully it'll catch up before the end of the mission...
If my site ever misses an observation, you can add it here:
http://www.tropicalatlantic.com/recon/addobservation/
It's simple to use, though no one ever seems to use it. While my site is updating every 2 minutes at the moment, for some reason on infrequent occasions the server must cache the data it downloads and doesn't try to download it again for a bit. Then an observation gets missed. (Other times the obs are just put out in the file faster than my site is set to retrieve data, making it miss some obs.) I try to reduce the load on the system by not having it always update every minute.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Recon Discussion

#1573 Postby SouthFloridawx » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:30 pm

The SE quad is going to be interesting.
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#1574 Postby tailgater » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:30 pm

Doesn't look to my old eyes like it's getting any better organized than it was earlier this morning. Pro's?
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Dave
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 13442
Age: 74
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:57 pm
Location: Milan Indiana
Contact:

#1575 Postby Dave » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:30 pm

000
URNT15 KNHC 231926
AF302 01AAA INVEST HDOB 23 20120623
191900 2455N 08745W 9735 00274 0042 +242 +231 241029 030 021 002 00
191930 2455N 08743W 9736 00272 0042 +244 +227 240030 030 021 003 00
192000 2455N 08741W 9724 00281 0041 +242 +230 239030 031 023 002 00
192030 2455N 08739W 9723 00286 0044 +241 +230 240032 033 024 002 00
192100 2455N 08736W 9724 00283 0043 +240 +236 237032 034 027 002 00
192130 2455N 08734W 9732 00275 0042 +240 +233 235034 035 026 002 00
192200 2455N 08731W 9736 00272 0042 +240 +234 231034 034 025 003 00
192230 2455N 08728W 9733 00275 0042 +240 +236 229033 035 025 002 00
192300 2455N 08726W 9734 00273 0041 +240 +236 229033 034 025 002 00
192330 2456N 08723W 9736 00271 0041 +240 +233 230034 034 025 001 00
192400 2456N 08721W 9735 00272 0042 +240 +233 230033 034 025 001 00
192430 2456N 08718W 9733 00275 0042 +240 +233 229034 035 025 000 00
192500 2456N 08715W 9734 00274 0043 +240 +232 228034 034 024 001 00
192530 2456N 08713W 9736 00274 0043 +240 +231 228033 034 022 003 00
192600 2456N 08710W 9734 00275 0044 +240 +230 229034 034 023 000 00
192630 2456N 08708W 9736 00276 0045 +239 +234 225032 034 024 000 00
192700 2456N 08705W 9736 00275 0046 +239 +233 225033 034 023 001 00
192730 2456N 08702W 9737 00275 0045 +240 +229 226034 035 023 001 00
192800 2456N 08700W 9737 00274 0045 +240 +226 227034 034 022 002 00
192830 2457N 08657W 9733 00278 0045 +240 +225 228033 034 025 002 00
$$
;

Flt Lvl: 35 kts; sfmr 27 kts - no flags
0 likes   

WeatherGuesser
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2672
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 6:46 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#1576 Postby WeatherGuesser » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:30 pm

I hate that 'sce ... ' word, but if #3 on the previous page plays out, I'd love to see if come further due north. We need rain desperately.
0 likes   

User avatar
TropicalAnalystwx13
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2109
Age: 28
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

#1577 Postby TropicalAnalystwx13 » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:31 pm

As this upper-level low that is currently shearing it backs southwest, upper level ridging should develop near Debby and help provide an environment conducive for further development. It's possible that the anticyclone could stay with Debby all the way to Texas (IMO) and help the storm slowly/gradually strengthen. I think we'll see a Category 1 hurricane landfall north of Brownsville but south of Galveston by next Friday.
0 likes   

WeatherGuesser
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2672
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 6:46 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#1578 Postby WeatherGuesser » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:31 pm

Air Force Met wrote:And for the record...I do not see how they DON'T upgrade it at 4...other than the fact it's Avila working the desk. This is a TS.



I'm on page refresh mode waiting for the maps to hit at any moment.
0 likes   

User avatar
vaffie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 898
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:11 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#1579 Postby vaffie » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:33 pm

The CMC ensembles are evenly split--1/3 to Texas, 1/3 to Louisiana, 1/3 to Florida. Even the GFS ensembles are almost evenly split, with 7 heading towards Texas, 9 heading towards Florida and the remainder somewhere in between. So even the models that we are relying on are very much split. Which means that only a slight variation one way or the other will determine where Debbie goes.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: Re:

#1580 Postby gatorcane » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:34 pm

Ivanhater wrote:
Evil Jeremy wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Still hard not to go with the rest of the models ECMWF/UKMET/CMC/NOGAPS which send this west.


CMC doesn't bring it west anymore, it's pretty much north on the 12z run. And GFDL joined GFS. The models are everywhere.


Yes, Canadian is Biloxi/Mobile


Yes I see that now. Interesting that the 12Z CMC plows future Debby right through the ridge. Could suggest the Midwest ridge will not be as strong as previously thought. Plus a pretty big swing to the right from the CMC.
0 likes   


Return to “2012”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests