wxman57 wrote:Nate is showing NO signs of being picked up as per the Canadian, so I'll stick with Mexico. Possibly even south of Tampico.
If it takes that track then wouldn't that help with our wildfires here?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
wxman57 wrote:Nate is showing NO signs of being picked up as per the Canadian, so I'll stick with Mexico. Possibly even south of Tampico.
Stormcenter wrote:Are you referring to the entire GOM?
If so, I hate to disappoint but it's (dry air) not going anywhere
anytime soon.SoupBone wrote:3090 wrote:Dry air in and around Nate in the GOM is getting squeezed out. If I had to bet, I would bet the dry air will oly be around another 24hrs. or so.
Do you have something to back this up? The Texas dry air looks persistent right now.
South Texas Storms wrote:wxman57 wrote:Nate is showing NO signs of being picked up as per the Canadian, so I'll stick with Mexico. Possibly even south of Tampico.
If it takes that track then wouldn't that help with our wildfires here?
South Texas Storms wrote:wxman57 wrote:Nate is showing NO signs of being picked up as per the Canadian, so I'll stick with Mexico. Possibly even south of Tampico.
If it takes that track then wouldn't that help with our wildfires here?
wxman57 wrote:Nate is showing NO signs of being picked up as per the Canadian, so I'll stick with Mexico. Possibly even south of Tampico.
dwsqos2 wrote:81 knots at 400 meters, bwah.
JtSmarts wrote:These BOC storms always have the potential to spin up rapidly especially in the last 3 years.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests