ATL: LEE - Remnants - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2183
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 6:04 pm
- Location: Gonzales, LA
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion
On the latest WV loop noticed there seems to be a weak UL low developing at the mouth of the mississippi. Is this forecast to stick around/strengthen for the next couple of days? What if any possible impacts could this have on the development and eventual track of 93L?
0 likes
- South Texas Storms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4226
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion
I don't see an swirl near the center of this like I did earlier. Maybe the center dissipated?
0 likes
-
- Tropical Depression
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:55 pm
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2183
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 6:04 pm
- Location: Gonzales, LA
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion
Shear looks to have shredded what was trying to form earlier. Thinking if the UL low over the mouth of the mississippi combining with the strong shear over the central gulf continues through tomorrow not sure if this could really develop much if there is anything left to develop.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models
Radiogirltx wrote:With this storm Having the possibility of multiple landfalls, it got me
To wondering. Which past storm has the distinction of most landfalls in it's track, before falling below TS status?
It's happened before. Very rare in Western Gulf of Mexico.
Tropical Storm Delia (1973)
http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/atl ... /track.gif
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion
My local met just showed the low going over Eastern LA and shifting East and 0 rain. But he's still saying that it's hard to forecast where the low will be since there isn't much they can check until the low forms or something.
00Z GFS should starting coming out soon.
00Z GFS should starting coming out soon.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion
Yes I noted the same thing (upper low over SE LA.)in an earlier post.
I would think it would throw a wrench at any significant development if 93L were to move
toward it. IMO
I would think it would throw a wrench at any significant development if 93L were to move
toward it. IMO
CYCLONE MIKE wrote:Shear looks to have shredded what was trying to form earlier. Thinking if the UL low over the mouth of the mississippi combining with the strong shear over the central gulf continues through tomorrow not sure if this could really develop much if there is anything left to develop.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2183
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 6:04 pm
- Location: Gonzales, LA
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion
Agreed stormcenter. Haven't seen any forecast saying anything about a ull developing and interfering with 93L. Seemed to have popped out of nowhere. Have to see if it is still around come tomorrow and friday. Not sure if it would impact the future track much but should definitely help to increase the shear over the northern gulf.
0 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:25 pm
Re:
nashrobertsx wrote:Actually if you look at landfall spots it's very narrow from cental la. to eastern ms/west ala (300 miles) (cept one model) but it's not about landfalls with a system like this.. it's the area to the north and east of the system which could get flooding rains....
One of those models is the Euro which is one of the most reliable. Also the CMC and some of the other models showed different landfall points at the 12z run which is more reliable than the 18z.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models
South Texas Storms wrote:Dean4Storms wrote:South Texas Storms wrote:0z NAM shifted SW through 36 hours. At this time during its 18z run it was inland in LA. Just south of Lake Charles on this run.
http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/NCOMAGWEB/appc ... mageSize=M
Looks like the initialization is too far west and south.
No if you look at its initial 850mb vorticity max, it is pretty much exactly where the 850mb vort max is on the ssec wisconsin site.
ding ding you are correct... it initialized correctly....

0 likes
- South Texas Storms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4226
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re:
Radiogirltx wrote:With this storm Having the possibility of multiple landfalls, it got me
To wondering. Which past storm has the distinction of most landfalls in it's track, before falling below TS status?
Mutiple landfalls before hurricane status I do not know but slightly reminds me of Elena on a pool table event,hiiting many sides before sinking.And so was Elena on Labor day

Last edited by Javlin on Wed Aug 31, 2011 10:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- Annie Oakley
- Category 5
- Posts: 1103
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:54 pm
- Location: Texas
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 145307
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re:
Annie Oakley wrote:Floater up on 93L
Here it is. Is a mess now,but NHC says conditions will be better tommorow.

Saved image.
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
- Janie2006
- Category 5
- Posts: 1329
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:28 pm
- Location: coastal Ms aka home of the hurricanes
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion
As long as that shear is howling across the Gulf it's going to be difficult to keep much of anything going. Maybe it'll turn out to be a drought-buster for someone, but so far no dice.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion
93L is sitting right next to 30knts of wind shear. It aint stacking in that environment not tonight anyway.
http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/w ... oom=&time=
steering
http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/d ... oom=&time=
Low Level convergence is still just north of the Yucatan.
http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/w ... oom=&time=
http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/w ... oom=&time=
steering
http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/d ... oom=&time=
Low Level convergence is still just north of the Yucatan.
http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/w ... oom=&time=
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2284
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:08 am
- Location: Baton Rouge, LA
- Contact:
If that shear wasn't there then this could be one awful week ahead. Thank goodness for small miracles.
Unless things improve overnight I think they will cancel recon and wait to go in on Friday when things should be better. They can upgrade and send out watches/warnings if needed.
Unless things improve overnight I think they will cancel recon and wait to go in on Friday when things should be better. They can upgrade and send out watches/warnings if needed.
Last edited by BigB0882 on Wed Aug 31, 2011 10:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- South Texas Storms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4226
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion
ROCK wrote:93L is sitting right next to 30knts of wind shear. It aint stacking in that environment not tonight anyway.
http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/w ... oom=&time=
steering
http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/d ... oom=&time=
Low Level convergence is still just north of the Yucatan.
http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/w ... oom=&time=
I'm thinking that it may have a center relocation in the next 24 hours. It doesn't look very strong at all right now.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models
well good thing about the EURO is we should get a pretty good idea with the first few hours and where if anything should go...that means I can hit the sack early.... 

0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests