Not sure if this has been posted, but a discussion on the models from HPC (not specifically pertaining to 91L)...looks like they are favoring the ECMWF ensembles...and the UKMET is having continuity errors.
Gridscale feeback? Is that why it was making the trough too deep I wonder?
EXTENDED FORECAST DISCUSSION
NWS HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL PREDICTION CENTER CAMP SPRINGS MD
307 PM EDT SUN JUL 31 2011
VALID 12Z WED AUG 03 2011 - 12Z SUN AUG 07 2011
HPC PROGS REMAIN PRIMARILY DERIVED FROM A 40%-40% BLEND OF THE 00Z
ECMWF AND THE 00Z ECMWF ENSEMBLE MEAN FOR OUR MEDIUM RANGE SURFACE
FRONTS/PRESSURE AND 500 MB PROGS THROUGH DAY 5...ALBEIT WITH 20%
06Z GFS ENSEMBLE MEAN MIXED IN. PREFER A TRANSITION TO A 70%-30%
BLEND OF SIMILAR SOLUTIONS FROM THE ECMWF ENSEMBLE MEAN AND 06Z
GFS ENSEMBLE MEAN THEREAFTER TO ADDRESS THE UNCERTAINTIES IN
SYNOPTIC DETAILS INHERENT TO THAT TIME RANGE. THIS BLEND FAVORING
THE HIGHER RESOLUTION ECMWF ENSEMBLE MEAN MAINTAINS BETTER HPC
CONTINUITY.
THE 00Z ECMWF SEEMS TO HAVE SETTLED DOWN FROM ITS DISCONTINUITY
OVER THE EASTERN STATES YESTERDAY...AND IS WELL SUPPORTED FOR THE
MOST PART NOW BY THE 06Z GFS ENSEMBLE MEAN AND 00Z ECMWF ENSEMBLE
MEANS INTO LATE WEEK.
THE 00Z GFS SHOWS GRIDSCALE FEEDBACK OVER
THE EASTERN GREAT LAKES DAY 3...WHICH PROPAGATES EASTWARD OFF THE
NEW ENGLAND COAST EARLY DAY 4. THE 06/12Z GFS RUNS HAVE ALSO
CONVERGED MORE UPON A SOLUTION IN COMMON WITH THE ECMWF FOR THE
COMING WEEK OVERALL. THE UKMET HAS SOME CONTINUITY ISSUES AT
SMALLER SCALES OVER THE LAST FEW RUNS AND THE GEM GLOBAL IS ALSO
NOISY WITH SHORTWAVES. OTHERWISE...THE LARGER SCALE PATTERN
REMAINS FAIRLY WELL CLUSTERED IN MOST OF THE MODEL SOLUTIONS FOR
MUCH OF THE WEEK OVER THE LOWER 48.
CISCO/SCHICHTEL
http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/discussion ... isc=pmdepd