ATL: DON - Remnant - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Cainer
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 188
Age: 34
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 3:26 pm
Location: Yarmouth, Nova Scotia

#1541 Postby Cainer » Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:50 am

Looks like it's all systems go for 90L tonight, wouldn't be surprised to wake up to a depression tomorrow morning. It's always amazed me how often storms seem to thread the needle of the Yucatan channel; it's such a small target to hit, but so many storms seem to sail right on through!
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#1542 Postby ROCK » Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:51 am

0z GFDL coming out soon....oh the suspense...

0z CMC doesnt see squat..... :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Texashawk
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 579
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:50 am
Location: Missouri City, TX (Houston)

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1543 Postby Texashawk » Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:55 am

ROCK wrote:
Texashawk wrote:
dwsqos2 wrote:I'm sorry, but I think this is still a mess. It was interesting this morning when I saw decent inflow, but now blah. Most of the did eventually develop a very sharp surface trough or weak surface low, so they haven't been that bad. I am going to play devil's advocate and say rather blindly that, based on the globals, no classification as a tropical cyclone will ever occur.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Are we even talking about the same system? I'm not trying to be rude, but... there's a pronounced spin, the cloud tops are firing very cold and the beginnings of a CDO is starting to form. Plus, the convection is expanding and the winds are closing off. If this is a mess, then I'd hate to see a real storm!


bro, hes been doing this same show since I became a member back in 04.....just let it go.... :lol:


Thanks Rock... not that I was doubting my own limited, amateur forecasting skills, but... no, I wasn't. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
TwisterFanatic
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1041
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma

#1544 Postby TwisterFanatic » Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:55 am

Won't be shocked whatsoever if RECON finds a TD tomorrow, maybe even Don.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Texashawk
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 579
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:50 am
Location: Missouri City, TX (Houston)

Re:

#1545 Postby Texashawk » Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:56 am

TwisterFanatic wrote:Won't be shocked whatsoever if RECON finds a TD tomorrow, maybe even Don.


Me, neither. It's really come together since about 9 PM. Solid core and good spin now. And since it's fairly small, it should pull itself together quickly.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#1546 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:59 am

TD4 at 5 am? Or will they wait for a visible?
0 likes   

User avatar
TwisterFanatic
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1041
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma

Re:

#1547 Postby TwisterFanatic » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:03 am

CrazyC83 wrote:TD4 at 5 am? Or will they wait for a visible?


If it's clear, and they got evidence from the buoys, yes, if not they'll wait for RECON.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1548 Postby ROCK » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:04 am

they might call it TD5....better now than later I think since its bound for a GOM landfall somewhere. MY bet is recon will name this once they get in there tomorrow.

IMO, this might more formidable than some think....Models never handle intensity well....
0 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneBrain
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 520
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:07 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1549 Postby HurricaneBrain » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:08 am

dwsqos2 wrote:I'm sorry, but I think this is still a mess. It was interesting this morning when I saw decent inflow, but now blah. Most of the did eventually develop a very sharp surface trough or weak surface low, so they haven't been that bad. I am going to play devil's advocate and say rather blindly that, based on the globals, no classification as a tropical cyclone will ever occur.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

And this is why Storm2k has a disclaimer. :eek:
Last edited by HurricaneBrain on Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
TwisterFanatic
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1041
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1550 Postby TwisterFanatic » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:09 am

ROCK wrote:they might call it TD5....better now than later I think since its bound for a GOM landfall somewhere. MY bet is recon will name this once they get in there tomorrow.

IMO, this might more formidable than some think....Models never handle intensity well....


That's a good point, didn't think about the GOM threat.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#1551 Postby ROCK » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:10 am

0z GFDL.....right up the Houston Ship channel ala IKE.....at 66knts....also a Cat 1

http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfdltc2. ... =Animation
Last edited by ROCK on Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#1552 Postby ROCK » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:14 am

HWRF....beefy cat 1 into Corpus...71kts

http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/hwrftc2. ... =Animation
0 likes   

BigB0882
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2284
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:08 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Contact:

#1553 Postby BigB0882 » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:16 am

GFDL seems to strengthen it rather quickly, from 35kts to 63kts in just 6 hours. Not sure if that will pan out but we don't want a rapidly strengthening storm moving in, it could surprise a lot of people.
0 likes   

User avatar
Texashawk
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 579
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:50 am
Location: Missouri City, TX (Houston)

Re:

#1554 Postby Texashawk » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:18 am

BigB0882 wrote:GFDL seems to strengthen it rather quickly, from 35kts to 63kts in just 6 hours. Not sure if that will pan out but we don't want a rapidly strengthening storm moving in, it could surprise a lot of people.


Indeed. Even the notoriously hyperbolic Houston weather media has been giving this one a slow yawn for the last day or so.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1555 Postby ROCK » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:18 am

All you GOMERS need to check out the 0z GFDL and HWRF runs...in the model thread...
0 likes   

User avatar
TwisterFanatic
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1041
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma

#1556 Postby TwisterFanatic » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:19 am

HWRF doesn't seem to unreasonable strength wise.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4229
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#1557 Postby South Texas Storms » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:23 am

Tonight's 0z Euro shows stronger vorticity making landfall near South Padre in 72 hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
hriverajr
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 786
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 12:16 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#1558 Postby hriverajr » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:24 am

The GFDL does not look right.. The "storm" would already have to be moving NW for it to verify. Maybe a bit of -removed- but if that verified.. parts of Texas who need rain the most would get nada.. zilch
Last edited by hriverajr on Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#1559 Postby ROCK » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:24 am

that is a pretty scary scenario given some of things we have seen over the last few years....Rita ,Katrina and even Humberto.....bombing out like they did....The GOM is incredibly toasty right now...

http://wxmaps.org/pix/hurpot.html#ATL
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#1560 Postby ROCK » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:28 am

0 likes   


Return to “2011”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest