ATL: DON - Remnant - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
BeachBumJen
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 12
Age: 46
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:14 pm
Location: Hempstead, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1421 Postby BeachBumJen » Tue Jul 26, 2011 7:40 pm

southerngale wrote:I just thought I'd point out that a lot of places in the Beaumont area have received very little rain. Most of it seems to keep falling in the same places. Consider yourself one of the lucky ones. I did get some yesterday, but it usually misses me.

I think there are a lot of places in Texas, and east of Texas, that would welcome a rainmaker, without the high winds.


At this point there are some places that would even welcome the wind as long as it brought it's friend water with it! :)
0 likes   

User avatar
tropicwatch
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3389
Age: 61
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
Location: Panama City Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1422 Postby tropicwatch » Tue Jul 26, 2011 7:50 pm

Some ship reports as of 0000GMT

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22980
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1423 Postby wxman57 » Tue Jul 26, 2011 7:50 pm

By the way, that ship with the NW wind at 25 kts at 21Z had a SE wind at 20 kts at 18Z and now has a SE wind at 15 kts. Clearly they made a typo in their wind direction section at 21Z. I don't see any LLC yet, but I think it will be a TD when recon arrives at 18Z tomorrow.
0 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneBrain
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 520
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:07 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1424 Postby HurricaneBrain » Tue Jul 26, 2011 7:52 pm

wxman57 wrote:By the way, that ship with the NW wind at 25 kts at 21Z had a SE wind at 20 kts at 18Z and now has a SE wind at 15 kts. Clearly they made a typo in their wind direction section at 21Z. I don't see any LLC yet, but I think it will be a TD when recon arrives at 18Z tomorrow.

What chance (%) would you give this to becoming Don?
0 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneBrain
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 520
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:07 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1425 Postby HurricaneBrain » Tue Jul 26, 2011 7:53 pm

panamatropicwatch wrote:Some ship reports as of 0000GMT

http://tropicwatch.info/ship.jpg


I wonder how long it's going to continue in that NW direction and how fast...
0 likes   

User avatar
tropicwatch
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3389
Age: 61
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
Location: Panama City Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1426 Postby tropicwatch » Tue Jul 26, 2011 7:57 pm

HurricaneBrain wrote:
panamatropicwatch wrote:Some ship reports as of 0000GMT

http://tropicwatch.info/ship.jpg


I wonder how long it's going to continue in that NW direction and how fast...


Only time will tell 8-)
0 likes   

crimi481
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 602
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:47 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1427 Postby crimi481 » Tue Jul 26, 2011 7:58 pm

Anyone think it will join the "ring of fire" - to its west (over Yucatan) - and get entrained into the southern part of the hifg's semi circle? Become part of S,W, Monsoon?
Hope not - but seems to be trend
May think I'm nutso - but I think its starting to do so? Ya Dink?
http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/geo/index ... thod=flash
0 likes   

BeachBumJen
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 12
Age: 46
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:14 pm
Location: Hempstead, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1428 Postby BeachBumJen » Tue Jul 26, 2011 7:59 pm

HurricaneBrain wrote:What chance (%) would you give this to becoming Don?


At this point I'd have to say 40%
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29113
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1429 Postby vbhoutex » Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:01 pm

After taking a look at the latest sat loops, I have to agree that there is not LLC at this point, especially with those wind reports thrown in. What I do see is sustained robust convection around/over a well defined MLC and that almost certainly will drive a LLC to the surface by the morning if not sooner. TD by recon like Wxman57 said seems almost a sure bet at this point. I don't see anything out in front of 90L at this point that would inhibit it much as it develops. As they say the trend is your friend, BUT if the trend I think I am seeing continues someone along the Gulf Coast from LA westward down to N Mexico is probably looking at a strong TS at a minimum when this system landfalls.

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


EVERYONE along the GOM should already have their kits ready. If you don't, then do it tomorrow. Better safe than sorry.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145460
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1430 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:01 pm

00z Best Track


AL, 90, 2011072700, , BEST, 0, 213N, 843W, 25, 1009, DB

ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/atcf/tcweb/ ... 011.invest
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1431 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:03 pm

Image

90L and the Greater Antilles
0 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneBrain
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 520
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:07 pm

#1432 Postby HurricaneBrain » Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:03 pm

My personal chances on this becoming Don are 80%. This is based on all model intensity forecasts and a gut feeling that recon will find something.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145460
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Models

#1433 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:05 pm

00z Tropical Models

Code: Select all

WHXX01 KWBC 270101
CHGHUR
TROPICAL CYCLONE GUIDANCE MESSAGE
NWS NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
0101 UTC WED JUL 27 2011
 
DISCLAIMER...NUMERICAL MODELS ARE SUBJECT TO LARGE ERRORS.
PLEASE REFER TO NHC OFFICIAL FORECASTS FOR TROPICAL CYCLONE
AND SUBTROPICAL CYCLONE INFORMATION.
 
ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR
 
DISTURBANCE INVEST (AL902011) 20110727 0000 UTC
 
        ...00 HRS...   ...12 HRS...   ...24 HRS. ..   ...36 HRS...
        110727  0000   110727  1200   110728  0000   110728  1200
 
         LAT    LON     LAT    LON     LAT    LON     LAT    LON
BAMS    21.3N  84.3W   22.2N  86.1W   23.4N  87.5W   24.5N  89.1W
BAMD    21.3N  84.3W   21.9N  85.9W   22.6N  87.7W   23.3N  89.6W
BAMM    21.3N  84.3W   22.1N  86.0W   22.9N  87.6W   23.8N  89.3W
LBAR    21.3N  84.3W   22.2N  86.0W   23.3N  88.0W   24.5N  90.2W
SHIP        25KTS          30KTS          36KTS          42KTS
DSHP        25KTS          30KTS          36KTS          42KTS
 
        ...48 HRS...   ...72 HRS...   ...96 HRS. ..   ..120 HRS...
        110729  0000   110730  0000   110731  0000   110801  0000
 
         LAT    LON     LAT    LON     LAT    LON     LAT    LON
BAMS    25.7N  90.5W   27.8N  93.8W   29.9N  97.4W   32.0N 100.5W
BAMD    23.9N  91.7W   25.1N  96.3W   26.1N 101.4W   27.4N 106.5W
BAMM    24.8N  91.2W   26.5N  95.3W   28.0N 100.0W   29.6N 104.3W
LBAR    25.6N  92.3W   27.9N  96.4W   29.8N 100.3W   31.2N 103.9W
SHIP        49KTS          58KTS          64KTS          68KTS
DSHP        49KTS          58KTS          35KTS          28KTS
 
         ...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR =  21.3N LONCUR =  84.3W DIRCUR = 300DEG SPDCUR =  10KT
LATM12 =  20.2N LONM12 =  82.4W DIRM12 = 300DEG SPDM12 =  11KT
LATM24 =  19.1N LONM24 =  79.8W
WNDCUR =   25KT RMAXWD =   60NM WNDM12 =   25KT
CENPRS = 1009MB OUTPRS = 1011MB OUTRAD =  120NM SDEPTH =   M
RD34NE =    0NM RD34SE =    0NM RD34SW =    0NM RD34NW =   0NM


Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#1434 Postby gatorcane » Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:06 pm

Hmmm.... I would give it higher than 40 but something is not right. No models are spinning this up.

And when no models are spinning this up, you have to wonder. I have learned models are generally smarter than me. :D

Had the gfs or ecmwf been bullish we would definitely see a code red right now.

By the way the HWRF always seems too bullish.
Last edited by gatorcane on Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:11 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1435 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:09 pm

Image

0Z position
0 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneBrain
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 520
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:07 pm

Re:

#1436 Postby HurricaneBrain » Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:10 pm

gatorcane wrote:Hmmm.... I would give it higher than 40 but something is not right. No models are spinning this up.

And when no models are spinning this up, you have to wonder. I have learned models are generally smarter than me. :D

Had the gfs or ecmwf been bullish we would definitely see a code red right now.

Model intensity models agree on a strong tropical storm in 72 hours. The models didn't even show this until last night/today and remember, they never forecasted Bret or Cindy to develop. Some models usually aren't specialized on intensity, mostly just the overall track.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: Re:

#1437 Postby gatorcane » Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:12 pm

HurricaneBrain wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Hmmm.... I would give it higher than 40 but something is not right. No models are spinning this up.

And when no models are spinning this up, you have to wonder. I have learned models are generally smarter than me. :D

Had the gfs or ecmwf been bullish we would definitely see a code red right now.

Model intensity models agree on a strong tropical storm in 72 hours. The models didn't even show this until last night/today and remember, they never forecasted Bret or Cindy to develop. Some models usually aren't specialized on intensity, mostly just the overall track.



Until I see the GFS or ECMWF on board, I am going to be skeptical.

Plus Brett and Cindy were so tiny. Did they ever really classify :D
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22980
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#1438 Postby wxman57 » Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:14 pm

gatorcane wrote:Hmmm.... I would give it higher than 40 but something is not right. No models are spinning this up.

And when no models are spinning this up, you have to wonder. I have learned models are generally smarter than me. :D

Had the gfs or ecmwf been bullish we would definitely see a code red right now.

By the way the HWRF always seems too bullish.


And that's why I think the NHC forecasters are reluctant to go higher on development. However, you have to go with what you're observing not what the models are saying. This is a relatively small system that may not be initialized well in the models. Looks like a TC on the verge of development to me.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#1439 Postby HouTXmetro » Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:18 pm

I'm just shocked that despite the persistent convection this thing hasn't developed an LLC.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
Macrocane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4218
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 5:35 pm
Location: El Salvador

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - Discussion

#1440 Postby Macrocane » Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:21 pm

I have to say that I didn't believe that this system was going to look that good a few days ago, it has maintained the convection for more than 24 hours, it has a good spin and you can see some inflow channels, it only lacks good outflow to get going IMO. The models have done a bad job predicting cyclogenesis in the Atlantic this season hopefully they will be better in the peak.
0 likes   


Return to “2011”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests