2010 retired hurricanes
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 348
- Age: 35
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 2:12 am
Re: 2010 retired hurricanes
Since the 1959 season...Escuminac?
Also, I think Karl's chances may have taken a hit of some sort because of the damage report.
Also, I think Karl's chances may have taken a hit of some sort because of the damage report.
0 likes
-
- Category 3
- Posts: 813
- Age: 31
- Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:05 pm
Re: 2010 retired hurricanes
Ad Novoxium wrote:Since the 1959 season...Escuminac?
Also, I think Karl's chances may have taken a hit of some sort because of the damage report.
What the Hell did Mexico say to blow this storm's chance of retirement?
0 likes
Kay '22 Hilary '23
Re: 2010 retired hurricanes
HurricaneRyan wrote:Ad Novoxium wrote:Since the 1959 season...Escuminac?
Also, I think Karl's chances may have taken a hit of some sort because of the damage report.
What the Hell did Mexico say to blow this storm's chance of retirement?
LOL if It doesnt get retired it will be the costliest non retired hurricne. Ya think so?
0 likes
-
- Category 3
- Posts: 813
- Age: 31
- Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:05 pm
Re: 2010 retired hurricanes
Metalicwx220 wrote:HurricaneRyan wrote:Ad Novoxium wrote:Since the 1959 season...Escuminac?
Also, I think Karl's chances may have taken a hit of some sort because of the damage report.
What the Hell did Mexico say to blow this storm's chance of retirement?
LOL if It doesnt get retired it will be the costliest non retired hurricne. Ya think so?
Yeah.
But Mexico always smokes crack because they didn't retire Emily.
0 likes
Kay '22 Hilary '23
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: 2010 retired hurricanes
Ad Novoxium wrote:Since the 1959 season...Escuminac?
Also, I think Karl's chances may have taken a hit of some sort because of the damage report.
That's correct - Escuminac killed 35 in Canada.
0 likes
Re: 2010 retired hurricanes
CrazyC83 wrote:Ad Novoxium wrote:Since the 1959 season...Escuminac?
Also, I think Karl's chances may have taken a hit of some sort because of the damage report.
That's correct - Escuminac killed 35 in Canada.
UUUUMM................Escuminac? explanation please lol
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: 2010 retired hurricanes
Metalicwx220 wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:Ad Novoxium wrote:Since the 1959 season...Escuminac?
Also, I think Karl's chances may have taken a hit of some sort because of the damage report.
That's correct - Escuminac killed 35 in Canada.
UUUUMM................Escuminac? explanation please lol
That was a nickname for an unnamed 1959 hurricane there. Escuminac was the town hardest hit.
0 likes
- Hurricane Jed
- Category 2
- Posts: 545
- Age: 37
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:36 pm
- Location: Cen Tex
- Hurricane Jed
- Category 2
- Posts: 545
- Age: 37
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:36 pm
- Location: Cen Tex
- Hurricanehink
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2040
- Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:05 pm
- Location: New Jersey
Re:
Hurricane Jed wrote:Personally I find it hard to swallow that Igor and Earl make this the worst season in Canada since 1959. Did they completely forget about Hurricane Juan in 2003?
Yea, but Igor caused almost as much monetary damage as Juan did, and 2003 didn't have any other hurricane landfalls. In fact, 2010 was the last year since 1969 (as far as I could find) in which two hurricanes hit Canada (which was barely true then, as Gerda hit Maine, and Debbie did the same thing as Igor by passing just SE of Newfoundland).
0 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 348
- Age: 35
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 2:12 am
Re: 2010 retired hurricanes
HurricaneRyan wrote:Ad Novoxium wrote:Since the 1959 season...Escuminac?
Also, I think Karl's chances may have taken a hit of some sort because of the damage report.
What the Hell did Mexico say to blow this storm's chance of retirement?
It's actually the discrepancy between the estimates from the Mexican government and the final report. It's not actually the first time such a discrepancy existed between a storm's reports and the final report for the storm: 1998's Tropical Storm Javier in the East Pacific was initially reported to have had a high death toll and damage total (it was similar to Agatha from this year, but the death toll was slightly lower, yet some reports from the time said it was possible Javier had a 1000+ death toll) but the overall report didn't mention this. Javier wasn't retired after the season.
And technically, high damage doesn't automatically retire a storm: Juan in 85 was a billion-dollar storm and it somehow evaded retirement (it hit Louisiana and did a similar direct death toll to Karl).
Last edited by Ad Novoxium on Tue Feb 08, 2011 5:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2672
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 6:46 am
Re: 2010 retired hurricanes
The countries of the RA IV Hurricane Committee will have a meeting in the 2nd week of March, in that meeting they retire and replace the names so we will know wich ones were retired after that meeting.
0 likes
Re: 2010 retired hurricanes
WeatherGuesser wrote:When will they say?
If none are retired, will they say that? Or will there just be no statement?
Whenever the WMO or whatever it's called gets together and decides. I think it's sometime in March or April.
0 likes
- somethingfunny
- ChatStaff
- Posts: 3926
- Age: 37
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
- Location: McKinney, Texas
Re: 2010 retired hurricanes
I would pay a lot of money to get Kruschev on the 2016 list. They can't retire Igor though as $200M isn't a whole lot of money even by Canadian standards and also, there are literally no "I" names left. 

0 likes
I am not a meteorologist, and any posts made by me are not official forecasts or to be interpreted as being intelligent. These posts are just my opinions and are probably silly opinions.
- Hurricanehink
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2040
- Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:05 pm
- Location: New Jersey
Re: 2010 retired hurricanes
somethingfunny wrote:I would pay a lot of money to get Kruschev on the 2016 list. They can't retire Igor though as $200M isn't a whole lot of money even by Canadian standards and also, there are literally no "I" names left.
It's a lot for Newfoundland. There are only 450,000 people on the island. Proportionally, that would be $8.3 billion in Florida.
0 likes
- somethingfunny
- ChatStaff
- Posts: 3926
- Age: 37
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
- Location: McKinney, Texas
Re: 2010 retired hurricanes
Hurricanehink wrote:somethingfunny wrote:I would pay a lot of money to get Kruschev on the 2016 list. They can't retire Igor though as $200M isn't a whole lot of money even by Canadian standards and also, there are literally no "I" names left.
It's a lot for Newfoundland. There are only 450,000 people on the island. Proportionally, that would be $8.3 billion in Florida.
Wow, I hadn't thought of it that way. Okay, goodbye Igor....make room for Ichabod!
0 likes
I am not a meteorologist, and any posts made by me are not official forecasts or to be interpreted as being intelligent. These posts are just my opinions and are probably silly opinions.
-
- Category 3
- Posts: 813
- Age: 31
- Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:05 pm
Re: 2010 retired hurricanes
Ian needs to be next in line. it sounds NOTHING like Ivan so the people saying that are practically smoking crack.
There ARE K names left.
-Kurt
-Kellan
-Korey
-Konrad
-Krishan
-Kory
-Kullen
There ARE K names left.
-Kurt
-Kellan
-Korey
-Konrad
-Krishan
-Kory
-Kullen
0 likes
Kay '22 Hilary '23
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Hurricane2022 and 41 guests