ATL: NICOLE - Ex Tropical Storm - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- ObsessedMiami
- Category 1
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:08 pm
- Location: West Kendall, Fl
Re: ATL : INVEST 96L - Discussion
Florida1118 wrote:wzrgirl1 wrote:I feel for the NHC because you can't warn people with no storm but at the same time, it could ramp up quickly leaving residents with no time to prepare. This one is tough. I guess that is why they get paid the big bucks.
Well its not like it can ramp up to a major like Karl W/ the conditions N of Cuba. But they can Issue Flood Watches a day or so early, as well as HWO...So as long as they have SOMETHING mentioning "Hey, be aware a TC might form W/ flooding rain" or "Monitor the NHC for..." thats pretty good info to look out.
Let's cancel schools while we are at it (says the teacher)



0 likes
Re: ATL : INVEST 96L - Discussion
from PREDICTS discussion tonight-
http://catalog.eol.ucar.edu/cgi-bin/pre ... t=Get+Data
...PGI50L: As of 1700 UTC, PGI50L was located at 17.9 N, 89.8 W.
Note, however, that extreme caution should be exercised when
considering the location of this pouch today. At the
initialization time of 0000 UTC, the pouch that is being tracked
as PGI50L was still south of the Bay of Campeche in association
with the remnants of Matthew. A more representative analysis of
the location of PGI50L, including the uncertainty therein,
encompasses the area bounded by 11-21 N and 80-95 W amidst the
larger-scale monsoon gyre feature across the region (image 3). A
synthesis of available surface observations and across the
northwestern Caribbean today suggest that maximum sustained
surface winds are near 25 kt and that the minimum sea level
pressure is approximately 1004 hPa (image 3).
Three areas of deep convection are noted in association with
PGI50L: that associated with the remnant mid-tropospheric
circulation of Matthew between the Bay of Campeche and the Gulf
of Tehuantepec, a localized area of deep convection near 19 N,
84.5 W, and a widespread area of intense organized convection
along 81 W between 13-19 N. NCAR/NSF G-V dropsondes from a
survey of this region indicate the presence of a 700 hPa
convergence axis/trough along 18 N between the latter two areas
of convection (not shown). At the surface, both an ASCAT
overpass analysis from approx. 0320 UTC (image 4) and available
surface observations (image 3) indicate the presence of broad
cyclonic curvature to the near-surface wind field associated
with PGI50L somewhat to the southwest of that analyzed by the
G-V dropsondes. PGI50L is located underneath an east-west
elongated subtropical ridge centered near the southern Bay of
Campeche. Aloft, substantial upper tropospheric diffluence is
noted along with deep layer vertical wind shear of approximately
15-20 kt out of the north/northwest on the eastern periphery of
the upper anticyclone (not shown)...
http://catalog.eol.ucar.edu/cgi-bin/pre ... t=Get+Data
0 likes
- sfwx
- Category 1
- Posts: 371
- Age: 59
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:53 pm
- Location: Rural St. Lucie County, Fl
Re: ATL : INVEST 96L - Discussion
ObsessedMiami wrote:Florida1118 wrote:wzrgirl1 wrote:I feel for the NHC because you can't warn people with no storm but at the same time, it could ramp up quickly leaving residents with no time to prepare. This one is tough. I guess that is why they get paid the big bucks.
Well its not like it can ramp up to a major like Karl W/ the conditions N of Cuba. But they can Issue Flood Watches a day or so early, as well as HWO...So as long as they have SOMETHING mentioning "Hey, be aware a TC might form W/ flooding rain" or "Monitor the NHC for..." thats pretty good info to look out.
Let's cancel schools while we are at it (says the teacher)![]()
![]()
I agree!! ( says the teacher ) BUT, I always hate the "makeup" days later in the year.

Eric
0 likes
Re: ATL : INVEST 96L - Discussion
Florida1118 wrote:wzrgirl1 wrote:I feel for the NHC because you can't warn people with no storm but at the same time, it could ramp up quickly leaving residents with no time to prepare. This one is tough. I guess that is why they get paid the big bucks.
Well its not like it can ramp up to a major like Karl W/ the conditions N of Cuba. But they can Issue Flood Watches a day or so early, as well as HWO...So as long as they have SOMETHING mentioning "Hey, be aware a TC might form W/ flooding rain" or "Monitor the NHC for..." thats pretty good info to look out.
here in south Florida they sort of have, here is a link that shows you pretty much all of Miami's watch area has, click on the hazardous weather outlook, and the hydrologic outlook.
http://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick.ph ... 0.4396&e=0
0 likes
Re: ATL : INVEST 96L - Discussion
sfwx wrote:
Let's cancel schools while we are at it (says the teacher)![]()
![]()
Oh I want a Day off too! The make up days...You can keep those.

0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 145299
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: ATL : INVEST 96L - Discussion
Ok peeps,lets not deviate from the 96L topic.
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
Re: ATL : INVEST 96L - Discussion
artist wrote:Florida1118 wrote:wzrgirl1 wrote:I feel for the NHC because you can't warn people with no storm but at the same time, it could ramp up quickly leaving residents with no time to prepare. This one is tough. I guess that is why they get paid the big bucks.
Well its not like it can ramp up to a major like Karl W/ the conditions N of Cuba. But they can Issue Flood Watches a day or so early, as well as HWO...So as long as they have SOMETHING mentioning "Hey, be aware a TC might form W/ flooding rain" or "Monitor the NHC for..." thats pretty good info to look out.
here in south Florida they sort of have, here is a link that shows you pretty much all of Miami's watch area has, click on the hazardous weather outlook, and the hydrologic outlook.
http://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick.ph ... 0.4396&e=0
Tampa NWS Cancels their HWO at 4 or so, I never really have time to read it by the time I get home. I know NWS Miami, Jacksonville, and Key west Mention it in their HWO, but Tampa has not been really talking about it...Other than in the discussion.
Last edited by Florida1118 on Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
this could be a non-event for s. fl.,.most if not all the convection will be severly sheared to the east. most models(take those with a grain of salt) depict this going EAST of s. fl. so a sheared system would have convection out over the bahamas or open atl. keep in mind that this is forecast to become extra-tropical really fast. yeah, yeah, interaction with fronts SOMETIMES makes t.s. or hurricanes stronger but that takes time. this has not alot of time. i look for the next system(IF it happens) to be a REAL threat. just my opinion, i think the models are shooting dope, just like they do almost all the time from more than 3 days out
0 likes
- Evil Jeremy
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5463
- Age: 32
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re:
cyclonic chronic wrote:most models(take those with a grain of salt) depict this going EAST of s. fl.
Not really. The GFS, UKMET, GFDL, HWRF, and CMC models take this into SFL. Only the BAMs really move this away from the coast, and we know how bad they are to begin with.
0 likes
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL : INVEST 96L - Discussion
cycloneye wrote:Aric, what do you think of this position?
00z Best Track
AL, 96, 2010092800, , BEST, 0, AL, 96, 2010092800, , BEST, 0, 186N, 867W, 25, 1003, DB
ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/atcf/tcweb/ ... 010.invest
yeah thats fits well with surface obs actually and visible from earlier.
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Re: ATL : INVEST 96L - Discussion
Florida1118 wrote:Tampa NWS Cancels their HWO at 4 or so, I never really have time to read it by the time I get home. I know NWS Miami, Jacksonville, and Key west Mention it in their HWO, but Tampa has not been really talking about it...Other than in the discussion.
it could be because of how far this cool front is supposed to reach. Here is from Tampa's NWS office forecast discussion issued at 12:46PM today -
BY TUESDAY EVENING AND INTO
WEDNESDAY THE MODELS CONTINUE TO SHOW LOW DEVELOPMENT IN THE
WESTERN CARRIBEAN. THIS LOW WILL BE PULLED NORTH BY THE TROUGH
OVER THE SOUTHEASTERN STATES. WHILE DISCREPANCIES STILL
EXIST...THE MODELS ARE GENERALLY TRENDING TOWARDS STALLING THE
FRONT OUT ACROSS THE SOUTHEASTERN FORECAST AREA AND KEEPING THE
TROPICAL LOW PRESSURE GENERALLY TO THE SOUTH AND EAST OF OUR AREA.
http://www.nws.noaa.gov/view/prodsBySta ... ion#AFDTBW
0 likes
Re: ATL : INVEST 96L - Discussion
I, too, am expecting a non event for S. Fl.
This is not a prediction of any kind.
This is not a prediction of any kind.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL : INVEST 96L - Discussion
sunnyday wrote:I, too, am expecting a non event for S. Fl.
This is not a prediction of any kind.
will it rain? answer yes... so it is an event.. lol

0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Whats concerning is the 200mb at H54 has weaker shear and out of the SSW right along the SE coast of FL and much lighter right offshore . The cyclone will be moving NNE at that time likely so the shear may not have that significant of an impact. In fact, this set-up is similar to Irene and to a degree Irene was intensifying while passing through SFL.....This is not the directional shear that's the kiss of death for storms..Not by a long shot...
NAM 200mn at H54
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... 0_054l.gif
NAM 200mn at H54
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... 0_054l.gif
Last edited by Vortex on Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:16 pm, edited 3 times in total.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests