ATL: EARL - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 38088
- Age: 36
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
Re: ATL: EARL - Models
All the models are west of the NHC track, and several are way west:


0 likes
#neversummer
Re: ATL: EARL - Models
Hurricane Earl - steering flow - 350-850mb (950-969mb). That is a huge, very strong high!

0 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
- ColinDelia
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 5:52 am
- Location: The Beach, FL
- ColinDelia
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 5:52 am
- Location: The Beach, FL
- ColinDelia
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 5:52 am
- Location: The Beach, FL
- ColinDelia
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 5:52 am
- Location: The Beach, FL
Re: ATL: EARL - Models
anyone think the storm will get held to the west and hit the usvi/bvi/ PR hard???
0 likes
Re: ATL: EARL - Models
ColinDelia wrote:114 hours
Correct me if im wrong but isn't that showing a Strong2/low end cat 3 hurricane getting ready to Smash Nova Scotia?
The reason I ask is because I can't tell for sure if that's 969 MB's or 989 MB's...I really need to sleep
0 likes
Re: ATL: EARL - Models
It looks like 969, that storm is moving very fast, it has gone from the tip of Hatteras and the Gulf Stream to there in 24 hrs so there is not so much time for the cold ocean waters to kill it. There also is probably some sort of baroclinic enhancement.
0 likes
Re: ATL: EARL - Models
xironman wrote:It looks like 969, that storm is moving very fast, it has gone from the tip of Hatteras and the Gulf Stream to there in 24 hrs so there is not so much time for the cold ocean waters to kill it. There also is probably some sort of baroclinic enhancement.
yea, i'm a bit concerned about Earl as we've never been hit by a Major Hurricane before. Worst storm Nova Scotia has ever gotton was Juan....which was a very small system...Earl on the other hand is quite a large storm.
0 likes
- ColinDelia
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 5:52 am
- Location: The Beach, FL
Re: ATL: EARL - Models
Time_Zone wrote:
Correct me if im wrong but isn't that showing a Strong2/low end cat 3 hurricane getting ready to Smash Nova Scotia?
The reason I ask is because I can't tell for sure if that's 969 MB's or 989 MB's...I really need to sleep
Yeah it says 969 mb.
At 33 N, Danielle had estimated maximum sustained winds of 90 mph and central pressure of 972 mb.
Maybe that is a good comparison?
Were those estimated for Danielle or was recon still flying at that point? I haven't been following.
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 145299
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: ATL: EARL - Models
12z Tropical Models

Code: Select all
WHXX01 KWBC 301226
CHGHUR
TROPICAL CYCLONE GUIDANCE MESSAGE
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
1226 UTC MON AUG 30 2010
DISCLAIMER...NUMERICAL MODELS ARE SUBJECT TO LARGE ERRORS.
PLEASE REFER TO NHC OFFICIAL FORECASTS FOR TROPICAL CYCLONE
AND SUBTROPICAL CYCLONE INFORMATION.
ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR
TROPICAL CYCLONE EARL (AL072010) 20100830 1200 UTC
...00 HRS... ...12 HRS... ...24 HRS. .. ...36 HRS...
100830 1200 100831 0000 100831 1200 100901 0000
LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMS 18.5N 63.0W 19.9N 65.5W 20.8N 68.1W 21.5N 70.0W
BAMD 18.5N 63.0W 19.4N 64.8W 20.6N 66.5W 22.2N 68.4W
BAMM 18.5N 63.0W 19.8N 65.2W 20.9N 67.2W 22.1N 69.0W
LBAR 18.5N 63.0W 19.7N 65.0W 20.9N 66.9W 22.2N 68.8W
SHIP 100KTS 112KTS 117KTS 119KTS
DSHP 100KTS 112KTS 117KTS 119KTS
...48 HRS... ...72 HRS... ...96 HRS. .. ..120 HRS...
100901 1200 100902 1200 100903 1200 100904 1200
LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMS 22.4N 71.4W 27.4N 73.0W 34.2N 70.6W 41.2N 58.8W
BAMD 24.1N 70.5W 28.7N 74.3W 34.4N 71.9W 40.9N 59.3W
BAMM 23.6N 70.7W 28.3N 73.5W 34.6N 70.7W 41.5N 58.5W
LBAR 23.9N 70.7W 29.4N 73.5W 36.0N 70.5W .0N .0W
SHIP 116KTS 111KTS 99KTS 79KTS
DSHP 116KTS 111KTS 99KTS 79KTS
...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR = 18.5N LONCUR = 63.0W DIRCUR = 285DEG SPDCUR = 13KT
LATM12 = 17.7N LONM12 = 60.4W DIRM12 = 285DEG SPDM12 = 14KT
LATM24 = 17.1N LONM24 = 57.7W
WNDCUR = 100KT RMAXWD = 25NM WNDM12 = 80KT
CENPRS = 965MB OUTPRS = 1011MB OUTRAD = 250NM SDEPTH = D
RD34NE = 150NM RD34SE = 140NM RD34SW = 90NM RD34NW = 120NM

0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
This might be the greatest direct risk to the Northeast since probably Isabel in 2003...we are long overdue...it has been 19 years since Bob. According to the models, it looks at this point like it will stay far enough offshore that there will not be any major impact...maybe TS gusts on the Cape and Nantucket, although that can change in time if the models continue to move westwards. It is still four days away, so there is time to watch it.
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re:
HurrMark wrote:This might be the greatest direct risk to the Northeast since probably Isabel in 2003...we are long overdue...it has been 19 years since Bob. According to the models, it looks at this point like it will stay far enough offshore that there will not be any major impact...maybe TS gusts on the Cape and Nantucket, although that can change in time if the models continue to move westwards. It is still four days away, so there is time to watch it.
Isabel didn't really hit New England that much though, although there were tropical storm conditions in the western parts.
0 likes
Re: Re:
CrazyC83 wrote:HurrMark wrote:This might be the greatest direct risk to the Northeast since probably Isabel in 2003...we are long overdue...it has been 19 years since Bob. According to the models, it looks at this point like it will stay far enough offshore that there will not be any major impact...maybe TS gusts on the Cape and Nantucket, although that can change in time if the models continue to move westwards. It is still four days away, so there is time to watch it.
Isabel didn't really hit New England that much though, although there were tropical storm conditions in the western parts.
It didn't, but I remember a point in its life that the storm was expected to make landfall further north...Delaware/NJ on up.
0 likes
Re: ATL: EARL - Models
the GFS ensembles starting to spread out some.....some west some east...I would be watching that trend....
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests