ATL: EX-Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
tigergirl
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 59
Age: 55
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 7:12 pm
Location: Larose,LA

Re: ATL: EX-Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#2101 Postby tigergirl » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:55 pm

wxman57 wrote:
tigergirl wrote:So what can we be expecting from EX TD05 here in the South Lafourche area? I'm guessing possible heavy rain will be the main threat?


Just lots of rain. No significant wind.



Thanks, thats good as long as it keeps on moving and doesn't slow down or stall.
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: EX-Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#2102 Postby Wx_Warrior » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:55 pm

Getting some nice hard rain here in Beaumont. Band is moving fast..South about 20.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: EX-Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#2103 Postby ROCK » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:57 pm

glad I have been beating the "give it some time to stack" drum...as its doing so right now.. :wink:

you lack convection to the N and E more so to drier air than shear IMO....it is like one minute some of us are saying it looks like crap then turn around, after recon gets in there ,and boom its looking better.... :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#2104 Postby brunota2003 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:57 pm

Hm...the recco observation from where the wind shifted had a temperature of 24C, the recco down south, where they turned around, had a temperature of 25C

Looking at the obs, the wind shift was about 24.0C, and 8 or so obs later it was 23.3C
Last edited by brunota2003 on Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: EX-Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#2105 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:58 pm

Im starting wonder if this is going to turn north like the models are saying.. the weakness is just not very pronounce and its on the east side of a fairly strong ridge through almost all the steering layers....

This is the mid level steering but the low level steering is about the same I may have to jump on board with a farther west track. Im going to hold out but according to the models it should begin to turn right about now and I see no signs of that I guess I keep an eye on that now..

Image
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29112
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: EX-Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#2106 Postby vbhoutex » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:00 pm

http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=108909&p=2037912#p2037912
Looking at the recon graphic they apparently flew through at least the sw side of the LLC and are now headed N trying to close it off. Shows a definite drop of winds and change of direction of same time indicating this. Highest indication of winds so far I see is 25 kts. If they close this off and I think there is no doubt there I would expect TD status sooner than later.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#2107 Postby brunota2003 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:01 pm

According to that, shouldn't it actually be heading WSW or SW?
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: EX-Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#2108 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:02 pm

ROCK wrote:glad I have been beating the "give it some time to stack" drum...as its doing so right now.. :wink:

you lack convection to the N and E more so to drier air than shear IMO....it is like one minute some of us are saying it looks like crap then turn around, after recon gets in there ,and boom its looking better.... :lol:


it still looks like crap.. and there is no signs of "stacking" its still very sheared..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: EX-Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#2109 Postby ROCK » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:03 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
ROCK wrote:glad I have been beating the "give it some time to stack" drum...as its doing so right now.. :wink:

you lack convection to the N and E more so to drier air than shear IMO....it is like one minute some of us are saying it looks like crap then turn around, after recon gets in there ,and boom its looking better.... :lol:


it still looks like crap.. and there is no signs of "stacking" its still very sheared..



oh so the LLC is exposed more so now than it was before? I think not.... :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11160
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: EX-Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#2110 Postby Ivanhater » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:04 pm

Image
0 likes   
Michael

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: EX-Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#2111 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:05 pm

vbhoutex wrote:http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=108909&p=2037912#p2037912
Looking at the recon graphic they apparently flew through at least the sw side of the LLC and are now headed N trying to close it off. Shows a definite drop of winds and change of direction of same time indicating this. Highest indication of winds so far I see is 25 kts. If they close this off and I think there is no doubt there I would expect TD status sooner than later.


yeah it appears the LLC is defined enough to upgrade but the winds are a little less desirable but they upgraded it the first time where there was no defined llc so cant see why they would change that. so I give it 50 /50 at 5pm for upgrade but leaning more towards no because of the shear problem they may wait till 11pm.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#2112 Postby wxman57 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:05 pm

brunota2003 wrote:According to that, shouldn't it actually be heading WSW or SW?


They're making an "X" pattern. NW to SE then north to the NE quadrant then SW across the center to the SW quadrant. It's certainly better organized than when it was first upgraded, but it's quite sheared.
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29112
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: EX-Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#2113 Postby vbhoutex » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:06 pm

ROCK wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
ROCK wrote:glad I have been beating the "give it some time to stack" drum...as its doing so right now.. :wink:

you lack convection to the N and E more so to drier air than shear IMO....it is like one minute some of us are saying it looks like crap then turn around, after recon gets in there ,and boom its looking better.... :lol:


it still looks like crap.. and there is no signs of "stacking" its still very sheared..



oh so the LLC is exposed more so now than it was before? I think not.... :wink:

Gotta disagree with you to an extent Rock. It is not stacked or nearly stacked but it is working on it hard. It may make it later this afternoon, but it isn't there yet imo. And you know I have never been wrong. :cheesy: :wink:
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

Re: Re:

#2114 Postby brunota2003 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:06 pm

wxman57 wrote:
brunota2003 wrote:According to that, shouldn't it actually be heading WSW or SW?


They're making an "X" pattern. NW to SE then north to the NE quadrant then SW across the center to the SW quadrant. It's certainly better organized than when it was first upgraded, but it's quite sheared.

That post was about steering currents, but yes you are right they are doing their X pattern.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#2115 Postby Stormcenter » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:09 pm

If it's moving WSW at 6 mph then it has more then enough time
to get it's act together before landfall.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re:

#2116 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:10 pm

brunota2003 wrote:According to that, shouldn't it actually be heading WSW or SW?


well you have to remember that is a static image in a dynamic environment. the ridge will move east as the system moves west so it should round the south and SW side before texas... at least thats what it looks like at the moment.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Re:

#2117 Postby wxman57 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:11 pm

brunota2003 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:
brunota2003 wrote:According to that, shouldn't it actually be heading WSW or SW?


They're making an "X" pattern. NW to SE then north to the NE quadrant then SW across the center to the SW quadrant. It's certainly better organized than when it was first upgraded, but it's quite sheared.

That post was about steering currents, but yes you are right they are doing their X pattern.


Oh, I thought "it" was the recon plane. The low won't move with the upper-level winds. It'll move with the lowest level winds being such a weak low.
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5300
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

#2118 Postby Nimbus » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:13 pm

The convection is being pulled southwest by light shear so if the center chases the convection that direction it might buy some more time over water. Hopefully proximity to land issues will limit development but you could make a case for this system riding the coast all the way to Texas based on steering.
0 likes   

User avatar
Comanche
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 381
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:33 am
Location: Clear Lake City Texas

Re: ATL: EX-Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#2119 Postby Comanche » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:21 pm

I have crapped on almost everything thusfar this season, including the original TD5 from the surrounding environment, however this actually doesn't look all that bad and I feel we see a name on this one before moving onshore wherever it may go.
0 likes   
***I am not a meteorologist not do I play one on tv, so whatever I say is purely speculative on my part!***

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Re:

#2120 Postby KWT » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:23 pm

wxman57 wrote: It's certainly better organized than when it was first upgraded, but it's quite sheared.


Yeah I agree it does look better then when it got upgraded, its got a classic sheared presentation but since when has that ever stopped the NHC from upgrading in the Gulf. I see no real reason the NHC doesn't upgrade given the fact its close to land.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests