ATL: EX-Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
coreyl
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 77
Age: 36
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 9:14 pm
Location: Bay St Louis,Mississippi

#361 Postby coreyl » Tue Aug 10, 2010 2:24 am

This system looks like its moving wsw not wnw? Hmmm
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#362 Postby tailgater » Tue Aug 10, 2010 2:34 am

Radar shows a relocation? just north of the red echo on this radar. on the western edge of this radar site. Might just be a midlevel Circ. this far out.
http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?prod ... x&loop=yes
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ravyrn
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1000
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 5:10 am
Location: Alderbranch, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#363 Postby ravyrn » Tue Aug 10, 2010 2:47 am

Hmmm, looking at the doppler @ weather.com, there seems to be two circulations. A weaker circulation slightly northeast of Key West, and a much deeper circulation slightly west of Dry Tortugas moving SW. It seems to have moved around 10 miles in the last hour which I find rather alarming.

EDIT: Nevermind I determined that weaker circulation was my eyes playing tricks on me.
Last edited by ravyrn on Tue Aug 10, 2010 2:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
ravyrn
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1000
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 5:10 am
Location: Alderbranch, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#364 Postby ravyrn » Tue Aug 10, 2010 2:49 am

tailgater wrote:Radar shows a relocation? just north of the red echo on this radar. on the western edge of this radar site. Might just be a midlevel Circ. this far out.
http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?prod ... x&loop=yes


Yeah I noticed the same thing. That's one mean circulation! Even if it is a mlc I would imagine the llc would have to find its way to it. If you sue the radar @ weather.com, it will give you a better perspective. The quality is a bit more clear.
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#365 Postby tailgater » Tue Aug 10, 2010 2:58 am

ravyrn wrote:
tailgater wrote:Radar shows a relocation? just north of the red echo on this radar. on the western edge of this radar site. Might just be a midlevel Circ. this far out.
http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?prod ... x&loop=yes


Yeah I noticed the same thing. I'm quite the novice though. Could someone more savvy chime in regarding these two separate circulations? As strong as the one near Dry Tortugas is, based upon my personal opinion, even if thats not a llc, one would likely have to relocate there or in that direction.

Yes it probably will relocate if the deeper convection continues over there. surface obs still show the center father to the north and east ATTM.
Here's a great view of the ULL moving westward. Caution dial up users.
http://mkwc.ifa.hawaii.edu/satellite/sa ... verlay=off
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2776
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#366 Postby Frank P » Tue Aug 10, 2010 3:21 am

Viewing the long range radar loop out of the Keys sure hints of 94L starting to moving off to the west or WNW...
0 likes   

User avatar
ColinDelia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 918
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 5:52 am
Location: The Beach, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#367 Postby ColinDelia » Tue Aug 10, 2010 3:26 am

Merida, MX (yucutan) 1011 mb
Key West 1010 mb

A broad low currently
Last edited by ColinDelia on Tue Aug 10, 2010 5:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1704
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

#368 Postby bob rulz » Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:23 am

I'm surprised this is only at 50%, this has the look of a rapidly developing system. I would put the percentage closer to 70%.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#369 Postby KWT » Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:42 am

Hmmm it looks like its getting there bit by bit.

Whats interesting to note is thye frontal boundary is all but gone now so we are now seeing the system convective on its own more or less.

Feeling quite optimistic of development in the next 24hrs...recon will be most interesting!
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

WeatherGuesser
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2672
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 6:46 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#370 Postby WeatherGuesser » Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:49 am

Frank P wrote:Viewing the long range radar loop out of the Keys sure hints of 94L starting to moving off to the west or WNW...



Looks almost due west to me.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#371 Postby KWT » Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:53 am

Hmmm until we get Vis.imagery I'm going to hold off trying to make a guess where its heading.

Still if I had to make a guess, yeah a slow westerly motion may not be a bad call.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3999
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

Re:

#372 Postby AJC3 » Tue Aug 10, 2010 5:01 am

bob rulz wrote:I'm surprised this is only at 50%, this has the look of a rapidly developing system. I would put the percentage closer to 70%.


Nah, 50% is about right. There's only the one decent convective band to the south of the center, the 3-hour pressure falls in that area are less than 2MB, and it still isn't well-aligned with the large mid level low to it's E-NE.
0 likes   

User avatar
ravyrn
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1000
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 5:10 am
Location: Alderbranch, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#373 Postby ravyrn » Tue Aug 10, 2010 5:02 am

I've been watching the radar over the last three hours. I'm by no means seasoned at observing tropical systems, but despite my personal doubts, I think there's been two to three circulations waxing and waning between the area of Dry Tortugas and Key West. 3 hrs ago I thought there was a weak circ NE of Key West and a stronger one just west of Dry Tortugas. Then I second guessed myself and thought the one west of Dry Tortugas only. Now it is looking like there is one west of Dry Tortugas and another to the east, between Dry Tortugas and Key West. All these observations are based solely upon radar and of my personal opinion, but could anyone chime in as to what I have been seeing? I'm sure at least one of my observations are certain, but are all of them? Or are some of them my eyes playing tricks on me?
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Re:

#374 Postby KWT » Tue Aug 10, 2010 5:09 am

AJC3 wrote:
bob rulz wrote:I'm surprised this is only at 50%, this has the look of a rapidly developing system. I would put the percentage closer to 70%.


Nah, 50% is about right. There's only the one decent convective band to the south of the center, the 3-hour pressure falls in that area are less than 2MB, and it still isn't well-aligned with the large mid level low to it's E-NE.


Yeah I agree, 50% sounds about right still from what I'm seeing, of course recon could fly into the system later and find enough to justify an upgrade, we will just have to wait and see..
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#375 Postby wxman57 » Tue Aug 10, 2010 5:11 am

Seems to have a clear shot to move NW right into the mid Gulf coast. Nothing to indicate it's coming west to Texas, regardless of where it consolidates near SW Florida. I'm fairly confident this will become a TS in the next 24-36hrs.
0 likes   

WeatherGuesser
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2672
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 6:46 am

#376 Postby WeatherGuesser » Tue Aug 10, 2010 5:15 am

Looking at it on SPC, the rain all seems to be to the south, not much at all to the north.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#377 Postby KWT » Tue Aug 10, 2010 5:21 am

Wxman57, what do you think in terms of possible strength at landfall given its going to have at least another 2-3 days over water?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5300
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

#378 Postby Nimbus » Tue Aug 10, 2010 5:35 am

That ULL is definitely rolling west keeping 94L under shear. The ULL is forecast to weaken which will give an opportunity for the surface low to develop. The surface pressure near Polaski shoals is down to 1009 MB so it looks like 94L has drifted south a little overnight. Once that ULL gets west of the LLC it won't be shearing the convection south any longer.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#379 Postby KWT » Tue Aug 10, 2010 5:52 am

Yeah ULL now moving westwards but it looks like its starting to weaken already as well, there isn't really much of a southerly dig to the drier air that there was yesterday.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
mpic
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 622
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Splendora, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#380 Postby mpic » Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:08 am

There have been quite a few references to Alicia in this thread. That was my first hurricane and although it was small, we had quite a bit of damage and were without power for over a week here. Shows me that all storms need to be watched no matter the size. Much thanks to Storm2K!

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that Alicia formed a little farther west of this storm.
0 likes   
Alicia, Rita, Ike, Harvey and Beryl...moved to Splendora lol


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests