Bailey1777 wrote:i will bet a 20 dollar donation to s2k that this system gets west of 92.
Hey, thats a pretty cool thing to do!!
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Bailey1777 wrote:i will bet a 20 dollar donation to s2k that this system gets west of 92.
ROCK wrote:compare that to the 12Z and you got some different solutions....12Z splits 94 send a piece of energy into TX/LA border with the other into MS...0Z all into AL/MS but nothing more than a blob...a really weak blob....
Wx_Warrior wrote:Disliking this hint of a western trend
wxman57 wrote:redfish1 wrote:imo i think the models will shift west cause it is a lot further south and west than what was originally forecasted
That band of clouds extending NW from the disturbance to SE LA gives a good clue as to the steering currents. I don't think it makes much difference where it forms, the winds seem to be blowing toward SE LA. Would be nice if we could get some rain out of it, but I'm not counting on that.
Ivanhater wrote:I'm not seeing a west trend at all![]()
Euro..UKMET, Canadian all into Mississippi /Alabama area
Wxman mentioned earlier to look at the band earlier into SE Louisiana and the wind flow..not getting further west than thatwxman57 wrote:redfish1 wrote:imo i think the models will shift west cause it is a lot further south and west than what was originally forecasted
That band of clouds extending NW from the disturbance to SE LA gives a good clue as to the steering currents. I don't think it makes much difference where it forms, the winds seem to be blowing toward SE LA. Would be nice if we could get some rain out of it, but I'm not counting on that.
South Texas Storms wrote:so as of right now there is no chance at a texas landfall?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests