ATL: Ex INVEST 93L - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#321 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Aug 09, 2010 1:52 pm

Image

I'm about to go into hybernation until something real develops
0 likes   

User avatar
MiamiHurricanes10
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 260
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:56 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#322 Postby MiamiHurricanes10 » Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:18 pm

wxman57 wrote:Convection is dying out and shear seems to be on the increase. Looks like it's already past its peak as far as intensity.

Shear is conducive for development. Upper level winds are currently just 10 knots. Plus it has an anticyclone. This is in between two upper level lows which would suggest that upper level ridging should balloon in between. This by no means has gone "poof" just because convection waned slightly.

A little too quick to forget for my liking, there is still a high chance that this will become a tropical cyclone, all it needs in reality is a decent convective burst to get classified, the circulation remains in tact, closed, and well-defined.
0 likes   

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#323 Postby hurricaneCW » Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:26 pm

I had a feeling this one wouldn't develop and I was right. Danielle is not going to be some weak TS in the open Atlantic.
0 likes   

User avatar
MiamiHurricanes10
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 260
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:56 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#324 Postby MiamiHurricanes10 » Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:35 pm

hurricaneCW wrote:I had a feeling this one wouldn't develop and I was right. Danielle is not going to be some weak TS in the open Atlantic.

You're writing this off way too quickly. If it wasn't going to develop the NHC would not have a red circle around it.
0 likes   

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#325 Postby hurricaneCW » Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:40 pm

MiamiHurricanes10 wrote:
hurricaneCW wrote:I had a feeling this one wouldn't develop and I was right. Danielle is not going to be some weak TS in the open Atlantic.

You're writing this off way too quickly. If it wasn't going to develop the NHC would not have a red circle around it.


They have a red circle because there is a well defined LLC with some convection. The problem is that the environment does not appear to be conducive for any organization. If it was, we would have had a TS by now. The shear and dry air are not going to allow anything to form. I think this one is history. 94L is the only game in town, but even that one looks very uncertain.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#326 Postby KWT » Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:42 pm

I doubt its shear thats the problem right now, though its increasing, I can only imagine the set-up around it is rather stable at the moment, not dry per say but stable.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
MiamiHurricanes10
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 260
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:56 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#327 Postby MiamiHurricanes10 » Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:51 pm

hurricaneCW wrote:
MiamiHurricanes10 wrote:
hurricaneCW wrote:I had a feeling this one wouldn't develop and I was right. Danielle is not going to be some weak TS in the open Atlantic.

You're writing this off way too quickly. If it wasn't going to develop the NHC would not have a red circle around it.


They have a red circle because there is a well defined LLC with some convection. The problem is that the environment does not appear to be conducive for any organization. If it was, we would have had a TS by now. The shear and dry air are not going to allow anything to form. I think this one is history. 94L is the only game in town, but even that one looks very uncertain.

Shear is not a problem, only about 10 knots. The only problem is the dry stable air it is surrounded by. And if the environment "does not appear conducive" please explain this from the 2:05 PM EDT TWD:
"ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS APPEAR FAVORABLE FOR THIS SYSTEM TO BECOME A TROPICAL CYCLONE DURING THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS".

I do admit, this currently is not a tropical cyclone due to the lack of convection, but all these write-offs are very premature.
0 likes   

Florida1118

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#328 Postby Florida1118 » Mon Aug 09, 2010 3:08 pm

hurricaneCW wrote:I had a feeling this one wouldn't develop and I was right. Danielle is not going to be some weak TS in the open Atlantic.

You really cant say that a name will be or wont b a major. It just depends. Is it possible you just think this one wont develop because you want your major D name? Im still hopeful this is our 4th NS. Just a little pop of good convection and it should be ready. I agree with Miamihurricanes, we just need some patience. Ill right it off when the NHC does.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#329 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Aug 09, 2010 3:19 pm

Image

Latest
0 likes   

User avatar
TexasF6
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 816
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Austin, TX

#330 Postby TexasF6 » Mon Aug 09, 2010 3:35 pm

ITS DEAD JIM!!! Pooftastic all the way....I said it would be a naked swirl, and a naked swirl it is..... 8-)
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#331 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Aug 09, 2010 4:22 pm

Image

93L could be another Danny, 2003. Forming from a tropical wave but very high in latitude
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#332 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Aug 09, 2010 4:48 pm

Image

the center is in the dry area to the SW of the convection
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#333 Postby KWT » Mon Aug 09, 2010 4:59 pm

Looks like this one is gonna struggle now, can't rule out development as it starts to move away to the north again as systems like this seem to do better when they move northwards I've noticed.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
StormTracker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2903
Age: 59
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:06 am
Location: Quail Heights(Redlands), FL.

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#334 Postby StormTracker » Mon Aug 09, 2010 5:17 pm

Doesn't it have a better chance of moving further west now before heading north now that it's so weak, or are the steering currents that strong that it doesn't matter?
0 likes   
Something's wrong when you regret, things that haven't happened yet!

supercane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2858
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:27 pm

#335 Postby supercane » Mon Aug 09, 2010 5:55 pm

Still looks favorable aloft but hasn't been able to sustain any convection:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#336 Postby brunota2003 » Mon Aug 09, 2010 5:58 pm

Looks like it will start pushing into higher shear as it moves westward?
0 likes   

User avatar
MiamiHurricanes10
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 260
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:56 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#337 Postby MiamiHurricanes10 » Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:01 pm

StormTracker wrote:Doesn't it have a better chance of moving further west now before heading north now that it's so weak, or are the steering currents that strong that it doesn't matter?

Not in this case. A strong shortwave trough behind the one that produced 94L will be causing 93L to recurve.
Last edited by MiamiHurricanes10 on Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145286
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#338 Postby cycloneye » Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:36 pm

8 PM EDT TWO stays at 70%

SHOWER AND THUNDERSTORM ACTIVITY ASSOCIATED WITH A LOW PRESSURE AREA
LOCATED ABOUT 875 MILES EAST-NORTHEAST OF THE LEEWARDS ISLANDS
REMAINS LIMITED AND DISORGANIZED. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ARE
EXPECTED TO BE MARGINALLY CONDUCIVE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS
DISTURBANCE...AND ANY SIGNIFICANT ORGANIZATION OF THE THUNDERSTORMS
COULD RESULT IN THE FORMATION OF A TROPICAL CYCLONE. THE LOW IS
MOVING WEST-NORTHWESTWARD AT 10 TO 15 MPH AND IS EXPECTED TO TURN
NORTHWESTWARD AND NORTHWARD DURING THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS. THERE
IS A HIGH CHANCE...70 PERCENT...OF THIS SYSTEM BECOMING A TROPICAL
CYCLONE DURING THE NEXT 48 HOURS.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#339 Postby KWT » Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:51 pm

I'm just a touch surprised they've kept it at 70%, I know the models do still suggest some sort of development and whilst that may yet happen perhaps the best chance may have already gone by....probably will have another shot when its on the recurve pattern...but I'd put the chances probably down at 30% now.

Clearly something isn't right with this, looks like another good call from the models which didn't do alot with this one.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145286
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#340 Postby cycloneye » Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:01 pm

I was also surprised by the % staying the same. Maybe they see something favorable in the next couple of days that we are not seeing now.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests