ATL: Ex COLIN - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145307
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#321 Postby cycloneye » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:08 pm

SFLcane wrote:I think bermuda may also get into the picture.


Is the NE Caribbean looking better now than 12 hours ago or still we have to keep watching the track it takes?
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
wzrgirl1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:44 am
Location: Pembroke Pines, Florida

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#322 Postby wzrgirl1 » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:08 pm

Looks fishy to me. A big change from this morning.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#323 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:09 pm

Cycloneye, lets just say the NHC graphic (I'm guessing that mayb the consensus model or something?) shows this:

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb/gridded_ma ... 5_1200.png

Close enough to certainly need watching if thats the case.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

jaxfladude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1249
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:36 pm
Location: Jacksonville, Fla

Re: Re:

#324 Postby jaxfladude » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:12 pm

chzzdekr81 wrote:
jaxfladude wrote:So a track not unlike Hurricane Dora(1964) may still be possible?

Based on the current models, it has a chance of making landfall where Dora made landfall. But anything's possible, and the models can change over the next few days.


So true!
Hope the best track for all concerned happens. Totally misses any and all landmass.
0 likes   
Stay safe y'all

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#325 Postby hurricaneCW » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:14 pm

I'm about to start counting how many it's going to/probably going to fish posts. A lot of people act if the track is completely set in stone 7-10 days away. Nothing is certain right now, the strength, the track, the effects of the TUTT, and the strength of the upper level troughs.
0 likes   

User avatar
MiamiHurricanes10
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 260
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:56 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#326 Postby MiamiHurricanes10 » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:19 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
perk
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:35 am
Location: Richmond Texas

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#327 Postby perk » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:25 pm

wzrgirl1 wrote:Looks fishy to me. A big change from this morning.





Not so fast, we don't even have a fix on the center. Those models may tell a totally different story in a couple of days.
0 likes   

User avatar
wzrgirl1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:44 am
Location: Pembroke Pines, Florida

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#328 Postby wzrgirl1 » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:29 pm

Yes but the models are starting to pick up on a trough digging down which it didn't pick up on yesterday. Hard to ignore that.
0 likes   

User avatar
Recurve
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1640
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:59 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#329 Postby Recurve » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:29 pm

hurricaneCW wrote:I'm about to start counting how many it's going to/probably going to fish posts. A lot of people act if the track is completely set in stone 7-10 days away. Nothing is certain right now, the strength, the track, the effects of the TUTT, and the strength of the upper level troughs.


And if course it's not even a storm yet. Can't be a fishy if it doesn't take the bait.


From where it is, if it develops slowly, less chance of it turning out to make a complete run for it, since our friends in the islands may well be affected, even if it winds up that no other land is.

And I don't know anyone in Bermuda but we should think of them too when we say "fish."
Or maybe not -- little rich tax haven with pink beaches. They can watch out for themselves. < :) joke>
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#330 Postby ronjon » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:30 pm

SSD Dvorak:

01/2345 UTC 10.0N 37.8W T1.5/1.5 91L -- Atlantic

Best Track 10.1N 37.4W 91L

Both these positions put the estimated center on the SW fringe of the heavy mass of convection. The turning I see on IR that some are calling an optical illusion is very close to the SSD Dvorak position. Neither of these two locations are centered in the mass of convection so I'm wondering what others are seeing on a LLC forming. Or is the thinking a LLC is forming further north under the main convection? If so, those position estimates above would be way off.
0 likes   

User avatar
TwisterFanatic
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1041
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#331 Postby TwisterFanatic » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:30 pm

wzrgirl1 wrote:Yes but the models are starting to pick up on a trough digging down which it didn't pick up on yesterday. Hard to ignore that.


Yes, but that is still 7-10 days away. Anything can happen
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Recurve
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1640
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:59 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#332 Postby Recurve » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:32 pm

ronjon wrote:SSD Dvorak:

01/2345 UTC 10.0N 37.8W T1.5/1.5 91L -- Atlantic

Best Track 10.1N 37.4W 91L

Both these positions put the estimated center on the SW fringe of the heavy mass of convection. The turning I see on IR that some are calling an optical illusion is very close to the SSD Dvorak position. Neither of these two locations are centered in the mass of convection so I'm wondering what others are seeing on a LLC forming. Or is the thinking a LLC is forming further north under the main convection? If so, those position estimates above would be way off.


I don't see an LLC after looking at lots of sat loops, but I think the focus is close to best track numbers, under what was the westernmost blob.
0 likes   

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4230
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#333 Postby abajan » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:36 pm

Of course, there’s the dog to consider. (He seems to be trying to tear 91L to shreds!)
Image
:lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#334 Postby ronjon » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:37 pm

Recurve wrote:
ronjon wrote:SSD Dvorak:

01/2345 UTC 10.0N 37.8W T1.5/1.5 91L -- Atlantic

Best Track 10.1N 37.4W 91L

Both these positions put the estimated center on the SW fringe of the heavy mass of convection. The turning I see on IR that some are calling an optical illusion is very close to the SSD Dvorak position. Neither of these two locations are centered in the mass of convection so I'm wondering what others are seeing on a LLC forming. Or is the thinking a LLC is forming further north under the main convection? If so, those position estimates above would be way off.


I don't see an LLC after looking at lots of sat loops, but I think the focus is close to best track numbers, under what was the westernmost blob.


Even the best track location would be on the SW edge of the convective blob.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/flash-avn-s.html
0 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#335 Postby SFLcane » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:39 pm

ronjon wrote:SSD Dvorak:

01/2345 UTC 10.0N 37.8W T1.5/1.5 91L -- Atlantic

Best Track 10.1N 37.4W 91L

Both these positions put the estimated center on the SW fringe of the heavy mass of convection. The turning I see on IR that some are calling an optical illusion is very close to the SSD Dvorak position. Neither of these two locations are centered in the mass of convection so I'm wondering what others are seeing on a LLC forming. Or is the thinking a LLC is forming further north under the main convection? If so, those position estimates above would be way off.


8:05PM Special feature...

TROPICAL WAVE EXTENDS ALONG 22N39W TO 11N36W MOVING W NEAR 15
KT. THE WAVE IS EMBEDDED WITHIN AN AREA OF ENHANCED DEEP LAYER
MOISTURE EVIDENT IN TOTAL PRECIPITABLE WATER IMAGERY FROM 5N-28N
BETWEEN 35W-42W. A 1007 MB LOW IS CENTERED NEAR THE SRN EXTENT
OF THE WAVE AXIS NEAR 10N36W. CLUSTERS OF STRONG CONVECTION HAVE
DEVELOPED NEAR THE CENTER FROM 10N-12N BETWEEN 35W-38W
.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145307
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#336 Postby cycloneye » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:43 pm

I would not let my guard down here in the NE Caribbean even though the models miss the islands as anything can happen in the movement and in the upper pattern that can change those model tracks more to the left with time.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
wzrgirl1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:44 am
Location: Pembroke Pines, Florida

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#337 Postby wzrgirl1 » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:44 pm

abajan wrote:Of course, there’s the dog to consider. (He seems to be trying to tear 91L to shreds!)

:lol:

'

That's very funny actually. He isn't doing a very good job of it. Seems as if it's consolidating even more.
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#338 Postby ConvergenceZone » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:47 pm

wzrgirl1 wrote:Yes but the models are starting to pick up on a trough digging down which it didn't pick up on yesterday. Hard to ignore that.



I know what you are saying, and yes, the track is leaning more to out to sea than before, and it's very possible that's where it may go, but we need to keep a close eye on it just in case it does something unexpected....
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#339 Postby Ivanhater » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:47 pm

ronjon wrote:SSD Dvorak:

01/2345 UTC 10.0N 37.8W T1.5/1.5 91L -- Atlantic

Best Track 10.1N 37.4W 91L

Both these positions put the estimated center on the SW fringe of the heavy mass of convection. The turning I see on IR that some are calling an optical illusion is very close to the SSD Dvorak position. Neither of these two locations are centered in the mass of convection so I'm wondering what others are seeing on a LLC forming. Or is the thinking a LLC is forming further north under the main convection? If so, those position estimates above would be way off.


ASCAT suggests further north

Image
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
caribepr
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 10:43 pm
Location: Culebra, PR 18.33 65.33

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#340 Postby caribepr » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:48 pm

hurricaneCW wrote:I'm about to start counting how many it's going to/probably going to fish posts. A lot of people act if the track is completely set in stone 7-10 days away. Nothing is certain right now, the strength, the track, the effects of the TUTT, and the strength of the upper level troughs.


Actually, I think most people who follow storms seriously, and many on S2K do, are in a study, watch, wait and prepare accordingly mode, hurricane CW.

Thanks for the good, factual and informed info continuing to be put here, as usual. It helps a lot while I'm not at home! 8-)
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest