ATL: Ex COLIN - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#281 Postby ConvergenceZone » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:00 pm

when do you think it will be out of the ITCZ?
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#282 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:01 pm

Probably very close already CZ I'd imagine, note the large convective shield has really reduced and the convection is now more concentrated close to where any center would likely be.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

Re:

#283 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:03 pm

KWT wrote:Looks pretty much ready to upgrade right now IMO, nice blow-up right over the center...

As for the past historical map, I wonder if there are any more fishes/recurvers if you raise the location upto 11N instead of 9.8...but possibly not I suppose.
Given we have a likely upper trough I do slightly have to favour the storms that hit Newfoundland...so even they weren't total fishes really!


To see what would happen, I moved the position to 11.0N, 36.3W and narrowed the search to the month of August only within 65nm of the point. This was the result:

Image

Looks fairly similar to the other graphic. It appears to be weighted more towards landfall than recurve when moving through 11.0N, 36.3W at this time of year. Only two of the storms on the list make a true recurve, while the rest go on to impact land at some point along their journey.
Last edited by Extremeweatherguy on Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:09 pm, edited 3 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#284 Postby Ivanhater » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:03 pm

I think the eastern wave is swinging to its north and the center will develop further north. That may be why some of the models are swinging further north
0 likes   
Michael

dolebot_Broward_NW
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 529
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 6:38 am

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#285 Postby dolebot_Broward_NW » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:07 pm

This could end up being one of the storms that initiates a massive evac from southern Florida where people get stuck in traffic for hours and hours and run out of gas


Taccido,

Such a thing doesn't happen here. We are well weathered in the art of Hurricane and realize that the only people who need to evac are those on the coast and in trailers. Since most of the trailers have been destroyed in past hurricanes, or the land sold out from under them - there are very few of them left.

Our homes are strong, our wills are iron, and our beaches are mostly oil-free.

Seriously: http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=8389 The last big evac was Floyd and thats what started the idea of "inland evac".

When a big storm threatens, we just go inland to survive the surge.
0 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#286 Postby blp » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:07 pm

I have been out all day and just jumped on and I am very impressed with the system. I was curious if the convection east of the low around 33 or 34 W was the old mid level circ from the nice wave that came off Africa. It almost looks like it has been racing to catch up with the low.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/flash-rb.html
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#287 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:09 pm

Ivanhater wrote:I think the eastern wave is swinging to its north and the center will develop further north. That may be why some of the models are swinging further north


Its an interesting idea, certainly one to keep an eye on. That being said I think the region with 91L near 11N and tucked nicely within the deep convection looks in a good position to strengthen further.

The thing is with IR its impossible to have any idea where any center is due to the large convective shield.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#288 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:12 pm

Image

It should be TD #4 tomorrow morning and likely, Colin, later in the day.

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#289 Postby brunota2003 » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:13 pm

Just a couple of observations...the first is that I notice the deep convection is back (very similar to last night). The second is that tonight's convection looks a LOT more consolidated than it did last night, or even earlier today.
0 likes   

User avatar
Miami Storm Tracker
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 910
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 10:12 pm
Location: Key Largo, Fla.
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#290 Postby Miami Storm Tracker » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:14 pm

blp wrote:I have been out all day and just jumped on and I am very impressed with the system. I was curious if the convection east of the low around 33 or 34 W was the old mid level circ from the nice wave that came off Africa. It almost looks like it has been racing to catch up with the low.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/flash-rb.html

Evening Brian,

very potent system in the works, As in most cases a 50 / 50 shot at where it will go.
0 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re:

#291 Postby blp » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:15 pm

You can definitely tell that the convection is not competing with the ITCZ energy anymore.

brunota2003 wrote:Just a couple of observations...the first is that I notice the deep convection is back (very similar to last night). The second is that tonight's convection looks a LOT more consolidated than it did last night, or even earlier today.
0 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#292 Postby blp » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:18 pm

Yep, I see nothing to stop this from ramping up. As most have said today it should be easily classified tomorrow when the first visible comes up. I don't think the NHC will pull the trigger tonight being so far away.

Miami Storm Tracker wrote:
blp wrote:I have been out all day and just jumped on and I am very impressed with the system. I was curious if the convection east of the low around 33 or 34 W was the old mid level circ from the nice wave that came off Africa. It almost looks like it has been racing to catch up with the low.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/flash-rb.html

Evening Brian,

very potent system in the works, As in most cases a 50 / 50 shot at where it will go.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re:

#293 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:21 pm

brunota2003 wrote:Just a couple of observations...the first is that I notice the deep convection is back (very similar to last night). The second is that tonight's convection looks a LOT more consolidated than it did last night, or even earlier today.


I think thats the key point there, it does look a lot more consolidated then last night when it was clearly drawing lots of energy from the ITCZ, but that presentation looks so good now the NHC may not even bother to wait for the Vis imagery and upgrade it next time round.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#294 Postby SFLcane » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:22 pm

If it ramps up pretty quickly i think recurve is probably inevitable.
0 likes   

User avatar
Miami Storm Tracker
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 910
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 10:12 pm
Location: Key Largo, Fla.
Contact:

#295 Postby Miami Storm Tracker » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:22 pm

So what camp are you siding with, the recurve or the more west to wnw direction. I know it's way out but if it does get pulled north but misses the trough it just might do like a storm we know from 1992.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#296 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:23 pm

Might just be interesting to see how the track ends up evolving compared to what we saw with Bill, esp as both developed in a very similar location indeed, though as others have said in the model thread, we knew before it recurved what was going to happen.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re:

#297 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:25 pm

Miami Storm Tracker wrote:So what camp are you siding with, the recurve or the more west to wnw direction. I know it's way out but if it does get pulled north but misses the trough it just might do like a storm we know from 1992.

RIght now, I don't know. I have not anilized the models and stuff yet.
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#298 Postby Ivanhater » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:26 pm

ASCAT...looks like the center is in between the 2 blobs that are merging around 11.5N 35.5w

Image
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#299 Postby ronjon » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:31 pm

I dunno about all this rapidly developing stuff - I know its hard to tell on IR but there is some sort of turning west of the main blow up of convection near 10.5N-38.5W which would put the main convection east of the center if indeed that is the LLC. If not, then we have a MLC separated from a developing LLC, not a good sign for quick development.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/catl/loop-avn.html
Last edited by ronjon on Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 91L - DISCUSSION

#300 Postby blp » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:31 pm

Couple of hours ago. I think Ivan you might be correct on something between the two blobs.

Image
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests