ATL: INVEST 90L - MODELS

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Recurve
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1640
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:59 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - MODELS

#101 Postby Recurve » Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:58 pm

Thanks for the concise description Michael, I haven't been able to look at model runs.

If I ignore the GFS as far as development/track of this disturbance, is it at all good for forecasting evolution of Atlantic highs, just to be aware of what might be sitting in the way if this does develop and gain enough latitude?

Keep talking about what the models are showing regarding a TUTT dropping down or any breaks in the high.

I don't know enough to know if the modeled highs are fishy or blocking highs. I see GFS has the high retreat some from the east coast after a time, but, and this may be a very dumb question, which isobar matters when a storm is rounding a high? Can a hurricane get close to the 1024 mb bar or is it that pretty far from the edge that would steer the storm?
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - MODELS

#102 Postby Vortex » Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:37 pm

00Z GFS beginning to roll in....Wher will he end up this go aroud? I'll go with over or just North of the NE carribean/PR and into the bahamas...Thereafter, I'll let you know in 45-1hr :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11160
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - MODELS

#103 Postby Ivanhater » Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:24 pm

00Z run really backs off

150 hours approaching Islands

Image
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4224
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - MODELS

#104 Postby South Texas Storms » Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:26 pm

is that a tc approaching cancun in 150 hr on gfs?
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11160
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - MODELS

#105 Postby Ivanhater » Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:30 pm

168 hour...2 vort maxes :roll:

Image
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11160
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - MODELS

#106 Postby Ivanhater » Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:32 pm

180 hours

Image
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - MODELS

#107 Postby cheezyWXguy » Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:35 pm

Ivanhater wrote:180 hours

Image

this run seems like trash...I highly doubt theres going to be 2 vort maxes, or a cluster of them for that matter like at 150 hr, and all chasing each other like that.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#108 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:37 pm

The 00z GFS seems to keep the energy separate and never really bundles it like in earlier runs. You can see this very clearly when you compare the vorticity of the 18z run and the 00z run.

00z vs. 18z:

00z: http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... v_168l.gif

18z: http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... v_174l.gif

The 00z does still show a broad area of higher vorticity though, and if the model can focus all that energy into a smaller area in future runs, I wouldn't at all be surprised to see the stronger tropical cyclone scenario re-appear.
Last edited by Extremeweatherguy on Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Riptide
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 753
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:33 pm
Location: Cape May, New Jersey
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - MODELS

#109 Postby Riptide » Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:47 pm

I'm glad that the GFDL is available for intensity AND track guidance. I won't need to look at this trash model.

The GFDL may be to far north nonetheless but I'm willing to bet the ultimate solution is closer to the GFDL than what the 0z GFS is showing us tonight. It's almost as if it is an open wave. It initializes with a nice area of low pressure and loses it for reasons unknown.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

#110 Postby ROCK » Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:54 pm

IMO, 90L is still dealing with 2 features and will need time to sort its self out. Still embedded in the ITCZ and the models are intensifying it to fast IMO...thus the gain in lat....I would have to go with WXMN57 on the NE islands scenario..stays weaker longer thus more WNW...if I was an island guy I would be watching closely and staying up for the ECM every night.... :D

that means you Luis.... :D
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - MODELS

#111 Postby ROCK » Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:59 pm

Riptide wrote:I'm glad that the GFDL is available for intensity AND track guidance. I won't need to look at this trash model.

The GFDL may be to far north nonetheless but I'm willing to bet the ultimate solution is closer to the GFDL than what the 0z GFS is showing us tonight. It's almost as if it is an open wave. It initializes with a nice area of low pressure and loses it for reasons unknown.



the GFDL is notorious for its intensity bias...I am not even sure I would trust it since it does use part of the GFS in intializing.....as far as the NEW improved GFS, I say bring back ole reliable and start over on the new one....how you can implement a flawed model is beyond me....If I did this in my real job I would be toast....
0 likes   

xcool22

#112 Postby xcool22 » Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:03 am

ROCK best best posting of day .thanks :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11160
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - MODELS

#113 Postby Ivanhater » Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:04 am

Canadian really far north

Image
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - MODELS

#114 Postby ROCK » Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:07 am

[quote="Ivanhater"]Canadian really far north

http://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/data/mod ... 4.jpgquote]


going fishing on that run....
0 likes   

xcool22

#115 Postby xcool22 » Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:09 am

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11160
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - MODELS

#116 Postby Ivanhater » Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:11 am

HWRF..XCOOL, the long range has not updated yet

Image

Image
0 likes   
Michael

xcool22

#117 Postby xcool22 » Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:12 am

oh opps sorry
0 likes   

User avatar
Riptide
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 753
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:33 pm
Location: Cape May, New Jersey
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - MODELS

#118 Postby Riptide » Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:18 am

That is some really exotic intensity and track guidance from the HWRF. Does it really lift the system northward as it rapidly intensifies within the next 24 hours?
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11160
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 90L - MODELS

#119 Postby Ivanhater » Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:29 am

Nogaps, not all that impressed

Image
0 likes   
Michael

xcool22

#120 Postby xcool22 » Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:34 am

Ivanhater .cmc 00z 240hr take to far north
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests