Hurricane wrote:The models shift more west every run. I think the final landfall is going to be farther west than what most of us think.
The model consensus has actually shifted more East and North. Given the assumption this becomes Bonnie.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
StormClouds63 wrote:Ivan:
You've got guts ... never doubt the EURO! Study for that test, too.
lebron23 wrote:Hurricane wrote:The models shift more west every run. I think the final landfall is going to be farther west than what most of us think.
Agree. I am looking between Port O'Connor,TX and Gulfport, MS for a landfall IMO.
KWT wrote:Models somewhat shifting northwards with regards to any 2nd landfall. I think with the upper low to the north helping to tug the system via relocations towards the center a more northerly solution is certainly possible, though the motion should stay WNW.
The GFDL/HWRF look too far north IMO.
KWT wrote:Models somewhat shifting northwards with regards to any 2nd landfall. I think with the upper low to the north helping to tug the system via relocations towards the center a more northerly solution is certainly possible, though the motion should stay WNW.
The GFDL/HWRF look too far north IMO.
ROCK wrote:
I would say the HWRF and GFDL have not been that good at all this year...Maybe because of the Ops and Para GFS and its struggles....I dont know but I hardly take them into consideration....more weight to the EURO,CMC, then UKMET...GFS and its cousins are last in line....JMO...
bbadon wrote:Question, Will a developing system in the BOC change any thing in regard to 97L?
ROCK wrote:anyone notice the latest GFS ensembles.....very telling IMO...
Wx_Warrior wrote:I must not see what a good percentage of some are. IF this develops, just don't see it being a major player.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests