ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1041 Postby KWT » Thu Jul 08, 2010 6:49 am

41kts at Flight level found by rexon, probably very close to being enough to upgrade to Bonnie, only question is whether there actually still a closed low level circulation...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

#1042 Postby jasons2k » Thu Jul 08, 2010 6:50 am

A reminder folks:

12. Storm2K.org does not allow personal attacks and/or personal insults of any kind directed to The National Hurricane Center, it’s staff or any other professional weather organization for that matter. While one may disagree it is very important we keep respecting the weather professionals and their opinions. We are expecting all members to act respectfully at all times.
0 likes   

djones65
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 264
Age: 59
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:05 am
Location: Ocean Springs, MS

#1043 Postby djones65 » Thu Jul 08, 2010 6:52 am

Recon is located at 26.2N and 95.5W reporting SE winds 41 knots at 975 mb and SFMR is measuring 34 knots. Plane heading southwestward at the moment. Interestingly, aircraft recently ascended from 975 mb up to 921 mb... during the same time extrapolated pressure increased from 1007 to 1009 mb (I personally believe the surface pressure extrapolation may have been error due to the aircraft altitude increase during the same time as it is obviously still heading towards the center. Winds have veered from 125 degrees to 147 degrees so maybe the center is farther west? If SFMR is accurate i would not be surprised to see them continue to find tropical storm force surface winds, but will they upgrade if satellite presentation doesn't improve?
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re:

#1044 Postby x-y-no » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:00 am

djones65 wrote:Recon is located at 26.2N and 95.5W reporting SE winds 41 knots at 975 mb and SFMR is measuring 34 knots. Plane heading southwestward at the moment. Interestingly, aircraft recently ascended from 975 mb up to 921 mb... during the same time extrapolated pressure increased from 1007 to 1009 mb (I personally believe the surface pressure extrapolation may have been error due to the aircraft altitude increase during the same time as it is obviously still heading towards the center. Winds have veered from 125 degrees to 147 degrees so maybe the center is farther west? If SFMR is accurate i would not be surprised to see them continue to find tropical storm force surface winds, but will they upgrade if satellite presentation doesn't improve?


I suppose they may have intended to fly at 975, but found stronger winds than they expected so ascended a bit.

Funny, it almost looked to me like they overshot their descent since they were only at 975 for less than half a set, but that would be pretty extraordinary.
0 likes   

djones65
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 264
Age: 59
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:05 am
Location: Ocean Springs, MS

#1045 Postby djones65 » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:01 am

Last set of high density observations showed SFMR winds of 34 to 36 knots over large area. Highest flight level which is now at 925 mb was 42 knots. It's right on the cusp, but I don't think one can argue if they upgrade to Bonnie based on the SFMR and flight level wind measurements... At least that is my opinion...
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145282
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

#1046 Postby cycloneye » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:02 am

The headline of the 7 AM CDT advisory is:

BULLETIN
TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO INTERMEDIATE ADVISORY NUMBER 2A
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL AL022010
700 AM CDT THU JUL 08 2010

...POORLY-ORGANIZED TROPICAL DEPRESSION EXPECTED TO BRING RAINS TO
SOUTHERN TEXAS AND NORTHEASTERN MEXICO....
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

#1047 Postby Thunder44 » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:05 am

There is closed surface circulation somewhere. Matamoros,MX is reported a NNW at 7 mph

http://weather.noaa.gov/weather/current/MMTM.html

And Tampico,MX is reporting WSW at 12mph

http://weather.noaa.gov/weather/current/MMTM.html
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

#1048 Postby clfenwi » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:08 am

In place observations will trump satellite appearance every time. The sword cuts both ways; in this case it is in the storm's favor to have the plane around.

It does seem like they intended to fly this like mission like the depression was an unclassified system, at 1000 ft, before thinking better of it. Like x-y-no said, they were only down there for about half an ob set, but that's still five minutes; an eternity for flying at the "wrong altitude" if it were an accidental overshoot.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1049 Postby KWT » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:10 am

Well recon does suggest something close to 35kts than 30kts so it just depends on whether the NHC wants to upgrade it or not. As has been aid the presentation still isn't great, even if it has gained some convection in the last 4hrs or so.

Chances of upgrade has increased though with the winds being suggestive of something close to 35kts.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

djones65
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 264
Age: 59
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:05 am
Location: Ocean Springs, MS

#1050 Postby djones65 » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:18 am

Aircraft is finding tropical storm force winds... SFMR reported 40 knots within the past 10 minutes... HOWEVER, they cannot close off a circulation... The winds went from SE to E to ENE to E and ESE as they crossed from NE to SW through the depression... Current position is 25.2N and 96.8W only about 35 miles from the Mexican coast or a little less... Hmmm.. May not have a well defined center, but like what Thunder44 reported there is obviously a low pressure area based on surrounding obs... The pressure is a little higher also so that the surface circulation may be dissipating? This is not official information whatsoever and only my opinion based on recon observations.
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

#1051 Postby Frank2 » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:26 am

Yes, it's about the poorest excuse for a TD, though in all fairness when it was upgraded it looked much more impressive...

Persistence is the key, and the flare-up last night only lasted a few hours, but even with a lack of persistence it apparently was enough to cause the system to be upgraded...

As you said some winds are near or at TS speeds, and that was probably the main reason for the upgrade to TD status, since to not upgrade it would put the NHC in a bad position if a ship sinks because of a tropical system that was not classified, so more of a marine issue than anything...

Frank
Last edited by Frank2 on Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Macrocane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4218
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 5:35 pm
Location: El Salvador

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

#1052 Postby Macrocane » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:27 am

Am I the only one who thinks it has become better organized in the past couple of hours? With the increase in convection and the data from the recon I think it has a chance to be upgraded.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1053 Postby KWT » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:28 am

That would make sense djones given what we've all been looking at. If there is alack of a solid LLC I think the NHC will hold back on an upgrade even though winds do clearly support a TS...

Or they may just assume there is a center in there somewhere and upgrade anyway thinking it maybe just a brief issue and any LLC will redevelop soon. Who knows though!
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Macrocane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4218
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 5:35 pm
Location: El Salvador

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

#1054 Postby Macrocane » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:32 am

WHat a bout the radar? It could be helpful to see if there is a LLC.
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

#1055 Postby Thunder44 » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:35 am

Recon just found some NNW winds.
Last edited by Thunder44 on Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

djones65
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 264
Age: 59
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:05 am
Location: Ocean Springs, MS

#1056 Postby djones65 » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:35 am

Latest recon found NNE winds near 24.8N and 97.1W. There appears to be a very broad circulation center with a flat pressure gradient more than 50 miles wide from near the Mexican coast northeastward. Lowest pressures extrapolated thus far was 1007 mb. I personally believe this system still has a circulation and it has not dissipated yet, but like KWT stated the center may still "tighten" up a bit in a few hours as the western edge of the broad "pressure center" impinges on the coast. Even if there is not a well defined center of circulation there appears to be in my opinion a rather broad area (45-50 miles) of tropical storm force winds based on SFMR measurements 35 to 40 knots that will presumably still have to move onshore as the depression continues inland over the next several hours. I hope my post made sense...

This is not official information, please see official advisories from NHC for latest information.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re:

#1057 Postby Air Force Met » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:39 am

djones65 wrote:Latest recon found NNE winds near 24.8N and 97.1W. There appears to be a very broad circulation center with a flat pressure gradient more than 50 miles wide from near the Mexican coast northeastward. Lowest pressures extrapolated thus far was 1007 mb. I personally believe this system still has a circulation and it has not dissipated yet, but like KWT stated the center may still "tighten" up a bit in a few hours as the western edge of the broad "pressure center" impinges on the coast. Even if there is not a well defined center of circulation there appears to be in my opinion a rather broad area (45-50 miles) of tropical storm force winds based on SFMR measurements 35 to 40 knots that will presumably still have to move onshore as the depression continues inland over the next several hours. I hope my post made sense...

This is not official information, please see official advisories from NHC for latest information.


I agree. Looking at BRO radar it appears to me that the real circulation is about 120 miles SE of BRO and that the NHC has ID'd a vortex. They will probably have to relocate their position.
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

#1058 Postby tolakram » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:42 am

Image

Image
Last edited by tolakram on Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
cperez1594
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 67
Age: 38
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:11 am
Location: Harlingen, TX

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

#1059 Postby cperez1594 » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:44 am

The LLC can been seen in the Radar loop. It is Southeast of Brownsville about 120 miles. It slowing getting it act together trying to push for a TS
0 likes   
HAM Radio Operator KF5HFA
Deep South Texas- Rio Grande Valley

User avatar
Macrocane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4218
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 5:35 pm
Location: El Salvador

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

#1060 Postby Macrocane » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:45 am

Thanks for the radar! It doesn't look that bad actually, TS Danny last year looked worse, but at the end it doesn't matter if the NHC decide to keep it as a TD or upgrade it, the rains could be very dangerous for that area and they should be prepared.
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests