ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#901 Postby wxman57 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:02 pm

Cloud tops continue to warm as convection appears to diminish. That's a good sign. Also, buoy pressure to the south is rising and winds are still calm.
Last edited by wxman57 on Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#902 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:04 pm

wxman57 wrote:Cloud tops continue to warm as convection appears to diminish. That's a good sign.

???
On RBG i saw new plumes developing.
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#903 Postby tailgater » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:06 pm

wxman57 wrote:Cloud tops continue to warm as convection appears to diminish. That's a good sign. Also, buoy pressure to the south is rising and winds are still calm.

Yes and very quickly, someone pulled the plug.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#904 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:07 pm

wxman57 wrote:Cloud tops continue to warm as convection appears to diminish. That's a good sign. Also, buoy pressure to the south is rising and winds are still calm.

yep but the pressure rise is normal considering its moving away from the buoy... still weak pressure gradient though
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#905 Postby KWT » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:10 pm

wxman57 wrote:Cloud tops continue to warm as convection appears to diminish. That's a good sign. Also, buoy pressure to the south is rising and winds are still calm.


Well if it carries on the NHC may well be delayed in upgrading it, though for now we could just say it is a function of D-min...we shall see what happens in the next few hours.

As you've said before though, its not going to really make much of a difference whether it makes it or not really, still going to be a pretty miserable day tomorrow for a good portion of Texas.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#906 Postby Ivanhater » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:12 pm

Image
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#907 Postby wxman57 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:12 pm

Hurricane Andrew wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Cloud tops continue to warm as convection appears to diminish. That's a good sign.

???
On RBG i saw new plumes developing.


Try this loop I just made:
http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/gom.gif

Not much evidence there of increasing organization. I'd expect the NHC would be looking for some significant convective increase to upgrade.
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#908 Postby ozonepete » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:13 pm

The big issue here is the same as it was with Alex. It started out as, and is still, a part of an elongated low pressure wave/trough. Elongated systems are (of course!) not circular, and non-circular or non-symmetric lows cannot allow for maximum vorticity into the center. The way this is racing northwestward without consolidating into a more circular system tells you that it can't ramp up. Alex was able to because it moved more westward out of the SE to NW flow - i.e. it moved westward out of the fast SE to NW flow and that allowed it to consolidate and develop. This one seems like it's embedded in that flow for good so it will never "break out of it" and become more circular.

But what I was trying to say before is that even though it will never break out of that SE to NW flow and has little time left, the NHC will probably have to issue TS warnings even if they don't think it will reach true TS, because in the right front quadrant you will have to add the forward speed of 10-15 mph on top of 25 to 35mph winds. That will cause TS winds at the coast north of the center. In effect, it will be a TS regardless of the storm relative winds.
0 likes   

User avatar
funster
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 816
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:27 pm
Location: North Dallas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#909 Postby funster » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:17 pm

It has been continuing to slowly organize since last night. Still has time to become Bonnie. So say we all.
0 likes   

cwachal

#910 Postby cwachal » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:28 pm

convection is waning... unless more convection develops soon we wont see TD2 because it will take all day tomorrow to get convection again if nothing develops tonight and then it will be out of time
0 likes   

User avatar
hriverajr
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 786
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 12:16 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#911 Postby hriverajr » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:30 pm

It has one last chance to get organized. Convection has basically fallen apart this evening. I don't think it will be upgraded tonight, not with its current convective look. Seems to be somewhat of a lack of convergence with this system. This afternoon I could see outflow boundaries moving away from many of the thunderstorms. Will have to see what it looks like in the morning. I am more concerned about extra water into the Rio Grande.

Also it does not seem to have much rainfall with it at the moment.. as it moves inland you will have a pretty good convergence zone set up so rainfall will probably fill in nicely from the just below the upper texas coast down towards Brownsville, Hopefully it does not get hung up over Mexico south of the Big Bend again.
Last edited by hriverajr on Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
summersquall
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 230
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:23 am
Location: Jensen Beach FL 27°N 80°W (roughly)

#912 Postby summersquall » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:36 pm

Looking at the satellite loops it almost seems as though a system moving this quickly is virtually sheering itself?
0 likes   
My posts should NEVER, EVER, EVER be construed as an official forecast as I know virtually nada respecting the finer points of meteorology. Consequently, my posts are obviously NOT endorsed by any professional institution or the good folks at storm2k.org. For official information please refer to the weather gurus at the NHC and NWS.

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#913 Postby ozonepete » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:36 pm

As that burst of convection dies out over the Yucatan it will allow an increase over 96L. It's a balance of kinetic energy. I still think it will just make TS before landfall, but unfortunately probably right at the last minute.
0 likes   

User avatar
hriverajr
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 786
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 12:16 am

Re:

#914 Postby hriverajr » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:40 pm

summersquall wrote:Looking at the satellite loops it almost seems as though a system moving this quickly is virtually sheering itself?


Shear is diminishing.. ULL to the west moving off and filling a bit.
0 likes   

User avatar
KatDaddy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2815
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 6:23 pm
Location: League City, Texas

#915 Postby KatDaddy » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:46 pm

Last images indicate a TD as the Sun set. No doubt for Katdaddy. We shall see overnight if its official.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29112
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#916 Postby vbhoutex » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:49 pm

wxman57 wrote:
Hurricane Andrew wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Cloud tops continue to warm as convection appears to diminish. That's a good sign.

???
On RBG i saw new plumes developing.


Try this loop I just made:
http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/gom.gif

Not much evidence there of increasing organization. I'd expect the NHC would be looking for some significant convective increase to upgrade.

Please explain to me why there seems to be so much more convection over and near the Yucatan than near the "center" of a possibly organizing(not anymore imo)tropical system. Or am I reading this loop wrong? 96L has definitely perplexed me.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

User avatar
Over my head
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 7:52 pm
Location: Southeast Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#917 Postby Over my head » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:51 pm

Nederlander wrote:
Over my head wrote:ImageCouple times today I have heard (read) members posts say the rain we are having in SETX is 96L related. Is it? Or is it Remnants of Alex or even 95L...or something all by itself not related to any other system out there?

edited to learn to put images in posts correctly. :roll:


Pretty sure its because of the ULL slinging moisture inland.. could be wrong


Thanks for answering Nederlander. Nearly missed this post. Is the ULL the same dotted line ozonepete was pointing me to?Trying to keep up and learn without asking too many questions.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#918 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:58 pm

vbhoutex wrote:Please explain to me why there seems to be so much more convection over and near the Yucatan than near the "center" of a possibly organizing(not anymore imo)tropical system. Or am I reading this loop wrong? 96L has definitely perplexed me.



they are from sea breeze boundaries
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3999
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#919 Postby AJC3 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:58 pm

vbhoutex wrote: Please explain to me why there seems to be so much more convection over and near the Yucatan than near the "center" of a possibly organizing(not anymore imo)tropical system. Or am I reading this loop wrong? 96L has definitely perplexed me.


David, my guess would be either:

1) sea breeze thunderstorms, since we often see huge convective blowups over the Yucatan with or without a tropical disturbance nearby, or

2) enhanced convergence on the east side of the tropical disturbance creating a fairly stout convective band, or

3) some combination of 1 and 2.
0 likes   

User avatar
Annie Oakley
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:54 pm
Location: Texas

#920 Postby Annie Oakley » Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:02 pm

#1 is my guess.....
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests