ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#801 Postby srainhoutx » Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:51 pm

Perhaps a better place to discuss 'local weather conditions' would be here... :wink:

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=96890&start=4860
0 likes   
Carla/Alicia/Jerry(In The Eye)/Michelle/Charley/Ivan/Dennis/Katrina/Rita/Wilma/Ike/Harvey

Member: National Weather Association
Wx Infinity Forums
http://wxinfinity.com/index.php

Facebook.com/WeatherInfinity
Twitter @WeatherInfinity

User avatar
Houstonia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 829
Age: 60
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 9:45 am
Location: Sharpstown, Houston, Harris County, Southeast Texas.

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#802 Postby Houstonia » Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:53 pm

srainhoutx wrote:Perhaps a better place to discuss 'local weather conditions' would be here... :wink:

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=96890&start=4860



Sorry - was trying to answer Rock's question. Plus I thought that the flood warning was pertinent to 96L? Isn't it a part of that system?

anyway - my apologies.
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#803 Postby jasons2k » Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:58 pm

wxman57 wrote: Definitely not a well-defined LLC and organized convection. And it's not getting better organized in my opinion, it's less organized than earlier.


Alluding to an earlier post (definition of a TD), I think this pretty much sums it up for now.
0 likes   

User avatar
TeamPlayersBlue
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3445
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:44 am
Location: Denver/Applewood, CO

#804 Postby TeamPlayersBlue » Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:59 pm

i dont see a TD. I see a drought buster though
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Nederlander
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1250
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:28 pm
Location: Conroe, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#805 Postby Nederlander » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:02 pm

92L - (definitely looked like a TD if not a TS)
95L - (looked like a TD)
96L - (ive seen worse get upgraded to TD status)

is anybody else seeing a pattern here? is the NHC going by different standards this year? does the oil spill have an impact on their decisions? I am just trying to get a feel for whats going on..

At any rate, despite warming cloud tops, it looks better now than it has in a couple of days.. I mean i know that the upgrade to TD status doesnt mean much as far as effects go, but it does have an effect on numbers at the end of the season..
0 likes   

xcool22

#806 Postby xcool22 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:03 pm

96L not getting better organized imo.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#807 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:04 pm

Nederlander wrote:92L - (definitely looked like a TD if not a TS)
95L - (looked like a TD)
96L - (ive seen worse get upgraded to TD status)

is anybody else seeing a pattern here? is the NHC going by different standards this year? does the oil spill have an impact on their decisions? I am just trying to get a feel for whats going on..

At any rate, despite warming cloud tops, it looks better now than it has in a couple of days.. I mean i know that the upgrade to TD status doesnt mean much as far as effects go, but it does have an effect on numbers at the end of the season..


The problem is that "looks" can be very deceiving. We need data to verify the "looks."
0 likes   

Florida1118

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#808 Postby Florida1118 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:05 pm

In my opinion, it is better organized. This morning it was more of a elongated wave. now, more of a mass.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re:

#809 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:06 pm

xcool22 wrote:96L not getting better organized imo.


Very deceiving too. If you compare how this system looked yesterday to how it looks now, it definitely has become better organized. It's very likely to continue to organize as D-Max gets here and then it will runout of water!!!
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#810 Postby ozonepete » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:08 pm

jasons wrote:
wxman57 wrote: Definitely not a well-defined LLC and organized convection. And it's not getting better organized in my opinion, it's less organized than earlier.


Alluding to an earlier post (definition of a TD), I think this pretty much sums it up for now.


If there is any LLC at all right now under that convection, only Recon can tell. There is no other way to see it right now except for scatterometer microwave satellite, and there are no good passes right now. So there's no way to say for sure that there's not a well-defined LLC.
0 likes   

User avatar
Cookie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 477
Age: 37
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Isle Of lewis scotland

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#811 Postby Cookie » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:09 pm

Houstonia wrote:
srainhoutx wrote:Perhaps a better place to discuss 'local weather conditions' would be here... :wink:

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=96890&start=4860



Sorry - was trying to answer Rock's question. Plus I thought that the flood warning was pertinent to 96L? Isn't it a part of that system?

anyway - my apologies.


I just thought the same thing
0 likes   

Nederlander
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1250
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:28 pm
Location: Conroe, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#812 Postby Nederlander » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:10 pm

HURAKAN wrote:
The problem is that "looks" can be very deceiving. We need data to verify the "looks."

Maybe I should have used a different word.. I am not referring to visuals such as JUST satellite imagery.. I am talking about data and Recon as well.. With 92L we really didnt have that luxury but even some promets on here said that it was most likely a TD or weak TS that one day..
Last edited by Nederlander on Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#813 Postby Ikester » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:11 pm

Okay, this post may be erased by mods, but what the heck is everybody's deal with an upgrade? This piece of crap isn't worthy of much more than a vigorous wave. If they name it, all it does is put a feather in the caps of those who make ridiculous claims for a cataclysmic season. Upgrade yes...WHEN IT IS NECESSARY! This is NOT going to be a major hurricane and advanced warning will be moot to most people. For all intensive purposes, the storm has hit....I'm sitting on the north side of Houston (The Woodlands) and every freeway in the city is jammed. Multiple streets are experiencing high water and there is even wind damage. So please, enough with the upgrade stuff. Rant over.
0 likes   

User avatar
Comanche
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 381
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:33 am
Location: Clear Lake City Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#814 Postby Comanche » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:13 pm

Ok, One rum cocktail later and NO, it still looks like a mass of very disorganized convection that is in a waning process now. I'll even double down on the crow statement.

Good to see at least one pro-met on my side of the fence. (Don't go fence jumping wxman!!)
0 likes   

User avatar
Tireman4
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5853
Age: 59
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Humble, Texas
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#815 Postby Tireman4 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:14 pm

Ikester wrote:Okay, this post may be erased by mods, but what the heck is everybody's deal with an upgrade? This piece of crap isn't worthy of much more than a vigorous wave. If they name it, all it does is put a feather in the caps of those who make ridiculous claims for a cataclysmic season. Upgrade yes...WHEN IT IS NECESSARY! This is NOT going to be a major hurricane and advanced warning will be moot to most people. For all intensive purposes, the storm has hit....I'm sitting on the north side of Houston (The Woodlands) and every freeway in the city is jammed. Multiple streets are experiencing high water and there is even wind damage. So please, enough with the upgrade stuff. Rant over.



Oh my.
0 likes   

Nederlander
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1250
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:28 pm
Location: Conroe, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#816 Postby Nederlander » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:15 pm

Ikester wrote:Okay, this post may be erased by mods, but what the heck is everybody's deal with an upgrade? This piece of crap isn't worthy of much more than a vigorous wave. If they name it, all it does is put a feather in the caps of those who make ridiculous claims for a cataclysmic season. Upgrade yes...WHEN IT IS NECESSARY! This is NOT going to be a major hurricane and advanced warning will be moot to most people. For all intensive purposes, the storm has hit....I'm sitting on the north side of Houston (The Woodlands) and every freeway in the city is jammed. Multiple streets are experiencing high water and there is even wind damage. So please, enough with the upgrade stuff. Rant over.


I dont think anybody is calling for an upgrade without evidence that it is worthy of an upgrade. But historically, the NHC has been somewhat inconsistent with their upgrading or naming of storms. And thats not opinion, thats fact. There was one system recently (may have been last year, im not sure) that was going fishing in the atlantic, that had all the signs of a named system, yet they left it alone.. i dont think just because its not going to have a major impact, that it should just be left alone.. anyways I dont mean to get OT here so I digress.. back to 96 L
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#817 Postby brunota2003 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:15 pm

There is now a local impact thread (thanks to the mod that stickyed it!)

viewtopic.php?f=59&t=108505
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3999
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#818 Postby AJC3 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:17 pm

Discussions of marginal systems tend to be some of the most contentious around here. Not gonna single anyone out, but just let me ask that we keep our disagreements civil, toward each other, and toward any proefessional met or met agency that may be thrown into the conversation. Thx.
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#819 Postby tailgater » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:18 pm

Just my guess before they nail down a center if there is one. 23.6N 92.7W
Last edited by tailgater on Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#820 Postby ROCK » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:20 pm

Thanks for the update fellow Texans.


From what I can see from Hurakanks sat views. This is a TD IMO....and the poster brings up a good point. Oil spill related for no upgrade...I smell a rat...
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest