ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
drezee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3664
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#721 Postby drezee » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:36 pm



I have to agree. Especially, in the GOM and approaching land. This has 24 hours more over water...it can pop easily.
0 likes   

redfish1
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 125
Age: 44
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:24 pm
Location: Port Arthur, Tx

Re:

#722 Postby redfish1 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:38 pm

TexasF6 wrote:looks like a TD, that new cdo is nice and appears to be moving NNW ATM....this statement has not been endorsed by the NHC, nor Starfleet Academy, nor The Vulcan Academy of Science and Culture, and certainly not the Klingons!!!! :D


what satellite view do you see it moving NNW?
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re:

#723 Postby Air Force Met » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:40 pm

TexasF6 wrote:looks like a TD, that new cdo is nice and appears to be moving NNW ATM....this statement has not been endorsed by the NHC, nor Starfleet Academy, nor The Vulcan Academy of Science and Culture, and certainly not the Klingons!!!! :D


Sounds like a Romulan opinion.

"They are without honor..."

Warf
0 likes   

xcool22

#724 Postby xcool22 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:41 pm

i see nnw imo
0 likes   

User avatar
Tireman4
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5853
Age: 59
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Humble, Texas
Contact:

Re: Re:

#725 Postby Tireman4 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:41 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
TexasF6 wrote:looks like a TD, that new cdo is nice and appears to be moving NNW ATM....this statement has not been endorsed by the NHC, nor Starfleet Academy, nor The Vulcan Academy of Science and Culture, and certainly not the Klingons!!!! :D


Sounds like a Romulan opinion.

"They are without honor..."

Warf



What about the Vulcan High Command?
0 likes   

User avatar
wx247
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14279
Age: 41
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: Monett, Missouri
Contact:

#726 Postby wx247 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:42 pm

Yeah, I have to agree with AFM... wow... this is going to be interesting to watch how it plays out:

Image
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: Re:

#727 Postby HouTXmetro » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:43 pm

redfish1 wrote:
TexasF6 wrote:looks like a TD, that new cdo is nice and appears to be moving NNW ATM....this statement has not been endorsed by the NHC, nor Starfleet Academy, nor The Vulcan Academy of Science and Culture, and certainly not the Klingons!!!! :D


what satellite view do you see it moving NNW?


There is some discussion but if the Red L is a fix on where they think the center is then it's either moving NNW or the center has relocated. But I was told not to pay attention to the Red L on the map.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/gmex/loop-rb.html
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#728 Postby KWT » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:44 pm

IMO looking at that image wx247 its really just a matter of time before the NHC pull the trigger, probably will see them mention a tropcial depression is forming next time IMO...and they will probably pull the trigger if it holds for another 4-6hrs.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
BigA
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

#729 Postby BigA » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:44 pm

I definitely could see a TS Charley 1998 scenario with this system. (And by that I mean, tropical depression forms, becomes tropical storm, makes landfall in Texas w/o a lot of fanfare, but causes inland flooding).
0 likes   

User avatar
wx247
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14279
Age: 41
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: Monett, Missouri
Contact:

Re:

#730 Postby wx247 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:47 pm

BigA wrote:I definitely could see a TS Charley 1998 scenario with this system. (And by that I mean, tropical depression forms, becomes tropical storm, makes landfall in Texas w/o a lot of fanfare, but causes inland flooding).


I think the inland flooding is a huge potential here BigA. I think you are spot on with that concern. The HPC kind of bares that out... although I think we will see isolated higher amounts develop:

Image

Edit to add the following material:

Snippet from NWS Brownsville AFD: "TOTAL RAIN
AMOUNTS DURING THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS ARE FORECAST TO BE FROM 2 TO
4 INCHES WITH ISOLATED AMOUNTS AS HIGH AS 6 INCHES."

And from Corpus AFD: "NOW EXPECTING
TOTAL EVENT ACCUMULATIONS OF 2 TO 4 INCHES AREA WIDE FROM TODAY
THROUGH FRIDAY...WITH ISOLATED AMOUNTS OF 5 TO 7 POSSIBLE. "
Last edited by wx247 on Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#731 Postby KWT » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:49 pm

Yeah thats interesting to see how much inland flooding they are calling for...

Research mission heading towards 96L right now by the way.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Peanut432
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 119
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:21 pm
Location: Hollis Ok

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#732 Postby Peanut432 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:56 pm

WX247 I think that the newest issued map for days 1-3 has shifted that heavier rain to the Southwest.
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#733 Postby jasons2k » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:56 pm

In the old days, before the internet age and I ever heard of an "Invest", wasn't there a very clear-cut progression as follows:?

Tropical Wave
Tropical Disturbance
Tropical Depression
Tropical Storm
Hurricane

It just seems like the criteria isn't followed "to the letter" any more...and that bothers me.
0 likes   

User avatar
antonlsu
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 37
Age: 35
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:34 pm
Location: Galveston, Tx / Baton Rouge, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#734 Postby antonlsu » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:57 pm

Did any models see this NW movement?
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5899
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#735 Postby MGC » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:59 pm

The visable satellite loop is inconclusive. I see everything but a west wind. We need recon baby......MGC
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#736 Postby Ivanhater » Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:00 pm

antonlsu wrote:Did any models see this NW movement?


Yes, all of them

Image
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
thetruesms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 844
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Tallahasee, FL
Contact:

Re:

#737 Postby thetruesms » Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:01 pm

jasons wrote:In the old days, before the internet age and I ever heard of an "Invest", wasn't there a very clear-cut progression as follows:?

Tropical Wave
Tropical Disturbance
Tropical Depression
Tropical Storm
Hurricane

It just seems like the criteria isn't followed "to the letter" any more...and that bothers me.
It's more that before the internet age, this early, messy part of the process was hidden from everyone because NHC was the only source of information. Now we can all pull up the latest satellite, recon, and model data ourselves and basically follow the process more quickly than it actually runs.
0 likes   

User avatar
antonlsu
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 37
Age: 35
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:34 pm
Location: Galveston, Tx / Baton Rouge, LA

#738 Postby antonlsu » Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:01 pm

Looks like the models predicted more of a wnw movement.
0 likes   

User avatar
hriverajr
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 786
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 12:16 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#739 Postby hriverajr » Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:02 pm

Not the greatest of convection. But visible shows it continuing to get better organized. I would be surprised if this was not upgraded soon. Still looks to be moving just a tad north of west northwest. I'm getting concerned about Northeast Mexico again NW of Del Rio.. dams and reservoirs are totally full and this system may slow down as it gets in that area again. The ghost of Alex hung around for days just northwest of where I am located.
Last edited by hriverajr on Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#740 Postby Air Force Met » Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:02 pm

MGC wrote:The visable satellite loop is inconclusive. I see everything but a west wind. We need recon baby......MGC


Pretty clear eastward moving CU field on the Vis...could be seen near 24N/94.5W before the CI obscured it...

Plus buoy 42055 has had a NW..WNW...W wind all day...and its well away from the center...
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests