ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#681 Postby Ivanhater » Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:59 pm

Weatherfreak000 wrote:
Ivanhater wrote:IMO center relocations take time and this doesn't have that. I still don't think this will be upgraded before it moves inland. If it had more time I think it would be a shoe in.



95L had less time though, and we saw what happened (Or according to NHC), almost happened there.



Agree 100 percent. There are plenty of examples of storms taking off with little time. I just don't see a concentrated area of thunderstorms over the center. Taking a look at the loop, it looks more like the thunderstorms from the east blew over the center. NHC bumped chances up so well see
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#682 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:00 pm

Image

18z
0 likes   

User avatar
johngaltfla
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2069
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:17 pm
Location: Sarasota County, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#683 Postby johngaltfla » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:04 pm

It is looking better by the hour. If we can get a Bonnie out of this, I still have a good shot at 31 as predicted this year. :D

Let's just pray I'm wrong and that this one just stays no more than a TS or TD and fizzles on shore. The GOM is looking like we're going to take a beating this season and we haven't had a super active October in a while. The last thing the state of Florida needs now. FWIW, this is becoming a very fascinating start to the season for those of us here since the 04-05 season. Sort of reminds me of 05 every day.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#684 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:13 pm

Image

Latest
0 likes   

canes04
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 302
Joined: Sat May 22, 2004 5:41 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#685 Postby canes04 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:16 pm

As mentioned in my post this morning, I believe this will be classfied a TD this afternoon and Bonnie by morning.
I was pretty close on my LLC at 22 and 91.5.

A BROAD AREA OF LOW PRESSURE IS
NW OF THE YUCATAN PENINSULA ANALYZED AS A SURFACE TROUGH
EXTENDING FROM 28N95W NEAR HOUSTON TEXAS TO A 1007 MB LOW CENTER
NEAR 23N93W TO 21N92W...AS OF 1500 UTC

My attention is turning to the W ATL.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#686 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:20 pm

canes04 wrote:As mentioned in my post this morning, I believe this will be classfied a TD this afternoon and Bonnie by morning.
I was pretty close on my LLC at 22 and 91.5.

A BROAD AREA OF LOW PRESSURE IS
NW OF THE YUCATAN PENINSULA ANALYZED AS A SURFACE TROUGH
EXTENDING FROM 28N95W NEAR HOUSTON TEXAS TO A 1007 MB LOW CENTER
NEAR 23N93W TO 21N92W...AS OF 1500 UTC

My attention is turning to the W ATL.


You saw it getting better organized before anyone else.

W ATL? Big low pressure area?
0 likes   

dabears
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 11:34 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#687 Postby dabears » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:28 pm

I actually think when the next report comes out it will have skipped Depression and be classified as TS Bonnie. Just my opinion.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#688 Postby HouTXmetro » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:41 pm

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/gmex/loop-rb.html

I'm looking at the convective pattern and is that an upper LOW on the Lower/ middle TX coast now moving SW? If so, I know 96L can follow it but not plow into right? I would think this should slow 96L or moved the Low more northward. Help me understand.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#689 Postby Air Force Met » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:45 pm

dabears wrote:I actually think when the next report comes out it will have skipped Depression and be classified as TS Bonnie. Just my opinion.


Too bad recon was cancelled and it is sitting in the middle of the biggest data void in the Gulf.
0 likes   

User avatar
Comanche
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 381
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:33 am
Location: Clear Lake City Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#690 Postby Comanche » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:46 pm

dabears wrote:I actually think when the next report comes out it will have skipped Depression and be classified as TS Bonnie. Just my opinion.


If this becomes Bonnie, I'll eat a raw, west nile laden piece of crow.
0 likes   

User avatar
TeamPlayersBlue
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3445
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:44 am
Location: Denver/Applewood, CO

Re:

#691 Postby TeamPlayersBlue » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:48 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/gmex/loop-rb.html

I'm looking at the convective pattern and is that an upper LOW on the Lower/ middle TX coast now moving SW? If so, I know 96L can follow it but not plow into right? I would think this should slow 96L or moved the Low more northward. Help me understand.


im not seeing it
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
funster
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 816
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:27 pm
Location: North Dallas

#692 Postby funster » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:49 pm

Is is time for some recon? :?: :?:
0 likes   

dabears
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 11:34 am

Re:

#693 Postby dabears » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:51 pm

Looking like it but no sign of them. Probably parked and eating a late lunch.

funster wrote:Is is time for some recon? :?: :?:
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#694 Postby KWT » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:52 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
dabears wrote:I actually think when the next report comes out it will have skipped Depression and be classified as TS Bonnie. Just my opinion.


Too bad recon was cancelled and it is sitting in the middle of the biggest data void in the Gulf.


Yeah I thought it was a bit of a silly move to cancel the 12z recon that was planned for today, but there ya go!

There does seem like there is a circulation at low level looking at the loops. Convection still isn't amazing but it may well be enough if the system keeps hold of the convection for an upgrade IMO...but we shall see.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
BigA
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#695 Postby BigA » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:52 pm

As of 18z

Vorticity

Image

definitely stronger than 15z, and appears to be on the right side of the convection. Would give it a bit more time over water if this is the case.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: Re:

#696 Postby HouTXmetro » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:53 pm

TeamPlayersBlue wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/gmex/loop-rb.html

I'm looking at the convective pattern and is that an upper LOW on the Lower/ middle TX coast now moving SW? If so, I know 96L can follow it but not plow into right? I would think this should slow 96L or moved the Low more northward. Help me understand.


im not seeing it


Well our local Mets said that there was an Upper Low over Houston this morning.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 58
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#697 Postby lrak » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:54 pm

Comanche wrote:
dabears wrote:I actually think when the next report comes out it will have skipped Depression and be classified as TS Bonnie. Just my opinion.


If this becomes Bonnie, I'll eat a raw, west nile laden piece of crow.


Mmmm...Yummy, can't wait to watch that episode, will you put it on Youtube for us please oh please?
0 likes   
AKA karl

Also
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts on this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. My posts are my basic observations and are definitely not backed by any "well some" meteorological knowledge. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#698 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:57 pm

Tropical Cyclone:

A warm-core non-frontal synoptic-scale cyclone (check)

originating over tropical or subtropical waters (check)

organized deep convection (more or less, check)

a closed surface wind circulation about a well-defined center (check)


Image
0 likes   

Nederlander
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1250
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:28 pm
Location: Conroe, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#699 Postby Nederlander » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:58 pm

redfish1 wrote:maybe someone can help me understand why 96L is not following the low pressure to its north??

It is.. The ULL appears to be moving WNW now across S. TX.. 96L is also moving WNW..
0 likes   

User avatar
wx247
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14279
Age: 41
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: Monett, Missouri
Contact:

#700 Postby wx247 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:00 pm

Whether or not this becomes a named system or not... it is going to drag copious moisture north across Texas, Oklahoma,Kansas, Missouri, Arkansas, and Louisiana ahead of a cold front. Get ready for more flooding rains.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests