ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: Re:

#481 Postby Ikester » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:23 pm

Nederlander wrote:
I-wall wrote:
Didnt Alex go through RI immediately before landfall?


RI is classified as a pressure drop of at least 42 mbs in a 24 hr. period..

To my recollection I dont think Alex came close to that..


I thought it was 36 mb in 24 hours. I may very well be wrong about that though and your right, RI DID NOT happen with Alex.
0 likes   

Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: Re:

#482 Postby Ikester » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:24 pm

Ivanhater wrote:
BigA wrote:What data did the planes find that justify a more pro-development analysis? Did the planes sample the disturbance, or did they look at the environmental conditions around the disturbance and conclude that there is not too much wind shear, dry air, et cetera?


I have a feeling that 1001mb reading waved a red flag


Exactly which is why i am surprised they didn't opt for the 50%. That percentage is for the next 2 days. Certainly its higher than 40% I would think.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#483 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:25 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
TwisterFanatic
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1041
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#484 Postby TwisterFanatic » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:28 pm

Checking in.. How is 96 looking? I am getting a nice rain band from 95 here in Oklahoma.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Nederlander
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1250
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:28 pm
Location: Conroe, TX

Re: Re:

#485 Postby Nederlander » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:28 pm

Ikester wrote:
Exactly which is why i am surprised they didn't opt for the 50%. That percentage is for the next 2 days. Certainly its higher than 40% I would think.



But 96L hasnt showed much consistency other than blobs of convection (and the MLC).. I think a 10% increase is pretty accurate.. no doubt, if 96L continues to improve and finally consolidates, then yea the percentage will go up.. It just doesnt have a whole lot of time to get its act together..
0 likes   

User avatar
alan1961
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Derby, Derbyshire, England
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#486 Postby alan1961 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:29 pm

Yes IMO i think this will be a TD in the next 24 hours, take a
look at the 1klm visible (ghcc) before it dissappears and you can jus
make out a LL circulation under the denser convection, i think this one is on its way :lol:
Last edited by alan1961 on Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#487 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:29 pm

I think its not only the 1001mbs but the wind veering that occured to the west of the Yucatan, we had a WNW wind at one point and thats quite suggestive...plus the fact we had an upper high now developing is something that probably is also ringing alarm bells.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#488 Postby Ikester » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:30 pm

But outflow is becoming established in the NW quad, there's clearly some kind of LLC either forming or has formed, pressures are VERY low and it is clearly holding its own. The 50% is strictly my opinion.
0 likes   

Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#489 Postby Ikester » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:34 pm

My co-workers are surprised this isn't higher as well. My friend at the NWS just texted me with the same sort of dismay...
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145323
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#490 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:36 pm

00z Best Track

AL, 96, 2010070700, , BEST, 0, 210N, 899W, 25, 1008, DB

ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/atcf/tcweb/ ... 010.invest
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#491 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:38 pm

Ikester wrote:My co-workers are surprised this isn't higher as well. My friend at the NWS just texted me with the same sort of dismay...

I don't know. I think the NHC is doing it slowly so they don't cause Mass Hysteria.

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

I think this storm will continue to organize, and maybe develop tommorow. It should target C or E texas.
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#492 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:38 pm

Pressures measured by RECON can't be trusted, just measured 987 mb! lol
0 likes   

Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re:

#493 Postby Ikester » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:39 pm

HURAKAN wrote:Pressures measured by RECON can't be trusted, just measured 987 mb! lol


HAHAHAHAHA...yeah, that's definitely suspect at this point.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re:

#494 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:39 pm

HURAKAN wrote:Pressures measured by RECON can't be trusted, just measured 987 mb! lol

Wow. cat 1 pressure. What went wrong with thier system? Unless they are in a supercell or something...
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#495 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:41 pm

cycloneye wrote:00z Best Track

AL, 96, 2010070700, , BEST, 0, 210N, 899W, 25, 1008, DB

ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/atcf/tcweb/ ... 010.invest


AL, 96, 2010070700, , BEST, 0, 210N, 899W, 25, 1007, DB
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145323
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#496 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:42 pm

HURAKAN wrote:
cycloneye wrote:00z Best Track

AL, 96, 2010070700, , BEST, 0, 210N, 899W, 25, 1008, DB

ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/atcf/tcweb/ ... 010.invest


AL, 96, 2010070700, , BEST, 0, 210N, 899W, 25, 1007, DB


In a few minutes they updated hat. :)
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#497 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:43 pm

cycloneye wrote:
HURAKAN wrote:
cycloneye wrote:00z Best Track

AL, 96, 2010070700, , BEST, 0, 210N, 899W, 25, 1008, DB

ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/atcf/tcweb/ ... 010.invest


AL, 96, 2010070700, , BEST, 0, 210N, 899W, 25, 1007, DB


In a few minutes they updated hat. :)

hat? LOL. my keyboard is annoying too.

The NHC must have been trying to avredge out all those dropsonde pressures.
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#498 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:46 pm

Image

~ 14 miles from the coast
0 likes   

jaxfladude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1249
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:36 pm
Location: Jacksonville, Fla

#499 Postby jaxfladude » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:48 pm

Will there be an "Equipment failure" message soon or not?
That 987 reading is wacky :P
Alex had lower than usual pressure readings for a TD/TS/'Cane of his category also.
Last edited by jaxfladude on Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Re:

#500 Postby Evil Jeremy » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:53 pm

Ikester wrote:
Nederlander wrote:
I-wall wrote:
Didnt Alex go through RI immediately before landfall?


RI is classified as a pressure drop of at least 42 mbs in a 24 hr. period..

To my recollection I dont think Alex came close to that..


I thought it was 36 mb in 24 hours. I may very well be wrong about that though and your right, RI DID NOT happen with Alex.


However, it is possible that Alex was entering a period of IR in it's last few hours before landfall. According to the NHC, dropped 12 mbs in the five hour period leading up to landfall, during which a pinhole eye (commonly associated with RI) became visible.
0 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests