ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Admin
- Posts: 20009
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
MIMIC-TPW: http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... /main.html
Really looks like the spin has long since left the area.
Really looks like the spin has long since left the area.
0 likes
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 361
- Age: 39
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
- Location: Jacksonville, FL
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
If the pressure is coming in at 1001 mb, it is meteorologically impossible not to have a circulation of some kind.
0 likes
-
- Admin
- Posts: 20009
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
Ikester wrote:If the pressure is coming in at 1001 mb, it is meteorologically impossible not to have a circulation of some kind.
I believe it all depends on the background pressures, which are unusually low down there. I'm not sure why you would make a statement like that.
0 likes
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
One thing 96L has an advantage over Alex with is getting back over water quicker.
0 likes
Yeah Big A there is a small upper high developing there, it really is a small system though with a tight gradient between the higher shear and the low shear aloft. At least the MLC is in roughly the right area for development shear wise.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 361
- Age: 39
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
- Location: Jacksonville, FL
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
tolakram wrote:Ikester wrote:If the pressure is coming in at 1001 mb, it is meteorologically impossible not to have a circulation of some kind.
I believe it all depends on the background pressures, which are unusually low down there. I'm not sure why you would make a statement like that.
Experience. That is a low pressure regardless. Be careful who you criticize.

0 likes
- HouTXmetro
- Category 5
- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
- Location: District of Columbia, USA
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
Ikester wrote:tolakram wrote:
I believe it all depends on the background pressures, which are unusually low down there. I'm not sure why you would make a statement like that.
Experience. That is a low pressure regardless. Be careful who you criticize.
You'd be surprised how low you can go down to without a closed low if background pressures are deep enough. I grant you that is real low for the Atlantic and probably even a little low for the WPAC but a medium sized system that just can't quite close its circulation off and low background pressures could produce something close to that figure I'd have thought.
Mind you I swear someone said you can't use extrap for a reliable pressure gauge at the level they are flying at?
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
- Ivanhater
- Storm2k Moderator
- Posts: 11161
- Age: 38
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
- Location: Pensacola
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
I think we have a couple areas of low pressure. Certainly a lot of energy to go around, just needs to consolidate


0 likes
Michael
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 361
- Age: 39
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
- Location: Jacksonville, FL
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
Appears outflow is trying to become established on the left side of the apparent MLC near the NW Yucatan.
0 likes
- HouTXmetro
- Category 5
- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
- Location: District of Columbia, USA
Yeah its a really stretched out system thats for sure with lots of moisture working its way up from the Yucatan up towards LA.
Also Ivanhater you can see the mid level turning with the weak clouds rotating around in the NW Yucatan.
Also Ivanhater you can see the mid level turning with the weak clouds rotating around in the NW Yucatan.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 361
- Age: 39
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
- Location: Jacksonville, FL
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
Keep in mind that Hurricane Alicia went from a disturbance to a Cat. 3 in about 36 hours. If this system can organize, it will have an opportunity to deepen...
0 likes
The area of condusive conditions is rather small but right now the MLC is pretty close to that region, so actually things aren't too bad aloft really right now if it can sort itself out structually.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
- latitude_20
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 6:46 am
- Location: Tulum, Mexico
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
Reviewing the loops and I'm definitely seeing what vbhoutex and KWT are referring to - that low-level circulation north of the MLC really jumps out on the visible.
Will be interesting to see if it stacks up.
Will be interesting to see if it stacks up.
0 likes
- HouTXmetro
- Category 5
- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
- Location: District of Columbia, USA
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/loop-vis.html
Man, if I didn't know any better and saw this visible I'd be crapping in my pant's right now if this was headed my way. It looks GREAT on vis. but thanks to you guys experience I know it isn't much right now and has a way to go.
Man, if I didn't know any better and saw this visible I'd be crapping in my pant's right now if this was headed my way. It looks GREAT on vis. but thanks to you guys experience I know it isn't much right now and has a way to go.
0 likes
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 361
- Age: 39
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
- Location: Jacksonville, FL
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
HouTXmetro wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/loop-vis.html
Man, if I didn't know any better and saw this visible I'd be crapping in my pant's right now if this was headed my way. It looks GREAT on vis. but thanks to you guys experience I know it isn't much right now and has a way to go.
Thanks for the visual.

0 likes
- HouTXmetro
- Category 5
- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
- Location: District of Columbia, USA
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
Ikester wrote:HouTXmetro wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/loop-vis.html
Man, if I didn't know any better and saw this visible I'd be crapping in my pant's right now if this was headed my way. It looks GREAT on vis. but thanks to you guys experience I know it isn't much right now and has a way to go.
Thanks for the visual.
LOL, sorry....guess I got a lil out of hand.....but you get the point.
0 likes
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
Like I said earlier I think today looked better than yesterday since I can see that it does indeed have structure to it. Last night it was just a blob inland...
Alicia was moving dreadfully slow but yes she went to a 3 in a hurry...We have seen it happen with Humberto as a recent example...

Alicia was moving dreadfully slow but yes she went to a 3 in a hurry...We have seen it happen with Humberto as a recent example...
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests