ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
sphelps8681
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 785
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:37 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#321 Postby sphelps8681 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:46 am

TWC Dr. Knab just said this am not going to be today. They don't do flights over land.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#322 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:06 am

Ah thats fair enough, unless they think the center maybe offland still but we shall see...

Still held at 30% which means they probably won't bother going anyway today.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5300
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#323 Postby Nimbus » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:16 am

Does appear there may be a lower shear environment for invest 96 once it gets back out over the gulf.

The Texas coast makes it tough to narrow in on a landfall for a storm moving north or northwest. It will be a challenge for the NHC to forecast the track as well with 96L as they did with Alex.

Aric hasn't issued any speculations yet so I guess we can wait another day.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#324 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:20 am

I think 96L is probably heading for C.Texas....the models don't seem very keen on this developing at all now though and I think the odds of development overall before landfall is starting to go down now as it doesn't look to me like its getting any more organised really...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
johngaltfla
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2069
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:17 pm
Location: Sarasota County, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#325 Postby johngaltfla » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:32 am

I honestly think that if it doesn't develop and just stays an open wave, you won't hear any hearts breaking in the GOM. We really need the Gulf to remain storm free until the relief wells are finished and cap that disaster.
0 likes   

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#326 Postby srainhoutx » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:43 am

Sunrise over the Yucatan...

Image
0 likes   
Carla/Alicia/Jerry(In The Eye)/Michelle/Charley/Ivan/Dennis/Katrina/Rita/Wilma/Ike/Harvey

Member: National Weather Association
Wx Infinity Forums
http://wxinfinity.com/index.php

Facebook.com/WeatherInfinity
Twitter @WeatherInfinity

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#327 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:52 am

johngaltfla wrote:I honestly think that if it doesn't develop and just stays an open wave, you won't hear any hearts breaking in the GOM. We really need the Gulf to remain storm free until the relief wells are finished and cap that disaster.


To be honest given the surging SSE airflow at lwoer levels still, not sure its going to make a huge amount of difference to the oil spill if this developed or not really, wouldn't be much of a wind difference unless it got close to TS status.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145303
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#328 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:05 am

12z Best Track

Just off the coast near Cancun.

AL, 96, 2010070612, , BEST, 0, 201N, 870W, 30, 1007, DB

ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/atcf/tcweb/ ... 010.invest
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

xironman
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2522
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: NoVA

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#329 Postby xironman » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:12 am

Lots of convergence and divergence going to waste on this one.

Image

Image
0 likes   

Nederlander
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1250
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:28 pm
Location: Conroe, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#330 Postby Nederlander » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:20 am

Western Gulf = dry air

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#331 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:57 am

That placement puts it on the northern side of the deep convection which makes sense with the upper NW winds aloft.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#332 Postby HouTXmetro » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:57 am

Doesn't look organized but impressive convection this AM. and the Convection has been persistent in one area which leads me ti believe something was trying to work it's way down.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

djones65
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 264
Age: 59
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:05 am
Location: Ocean Springs, MS

#333 Postby djones65 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:00 am

96L is totally disorganized this morning. I believe the concentration of convection over the Yucatan is an mid level circulation just like a couple of days ago. I see a definitive low level cyclonic rotation in the low cloud field over the south central Gulf of Mexico well north of the Yucatan. If you can go to this link: http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/ which is the Interactive satellite site go to the 1km visible imagery and look near 24N and 89W. If you use animation you will clearly see the surface low in the central Gulf void of deep convection. All I can find is SE winds and rising pressure over the Yucatan now. I personally believe IF a surface circulation were to form it would have to be over the central Gulf. It's as if the energy is being pulled rapidly northward towards 95L and what is being tracked near Cancun is another mid level circulation just like the one that formed on July 4th. Does anyone else see this also?
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re:

#334 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:14 am

HouTXmetro wrote:Doesn't look organized but impressive convection this AM. and the Convection has been persistent in one area which leads me ti believe something was trying to work it's way down.


Possibly but it does look like its really struggled to work anything down, afterall its had the MLC for some time now.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re:

#335 Postby Dean4Storms » Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:23 am

djones65 wrote:96L is totally disorganized this morning. I believe the concentration of convection over the Yucatan is an mid level circulation just like a couple of days ago. I see a definitive low level cyclonic rotation in the low cloud field over the south central Gulf of Mexico well north of the Yucatan. If you can go to this link: http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/ which is the Interactive satellite site go to the 1km visible imagery and look near 24N and 89W. If you use animation you will clearly see the surface low in the central Gulf void of deep convection. All I can find is SE winds and rising pressure over the Yucatan now. I personally believe IF a surface circulation were to form it would have to be over the central Gulf. It's as if the energy is being pulled rapidly northward towards 95L and what is being tracked near Cancun is another mid level circulation just like the one that formed on July 4th. Does anyone else see this also?



Yes and I talked about this early yesterday, the area of lowest pressure with some low level turning was off the NE tip of the Yucatan yesterday afternoon and the night before passed over the Buoy in the Yucatan pass which clearly showed this lows passage. It was moving rapidly NNW.

I think the convection is the western Carib. however did form a secondary low and that is what they came along and tagged as 96L yesterday. I guess you can switch the Invest to different lows.
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#336 Postby ConvergenceZone » Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:27 am

johngaltfla wrote:I honestly think that if it doesn't develop and just stays an open wave, you won't hear any hearts breaking in the GOM. We really need the Gulf to remain storm free until the relief wells are finished and cap that disaster.



Amen! My thoughts exactly. I love watching storms develop, but the oil spill makes me sad and thinking of a storm making it worse makes me even sadder.
0 likes   

User avatar
TYNI
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 550
Age: 58
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re:

#337 Postby TYNI » Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:35 am

djones65 wrote:96L is totally disorganized this morning. I believe the concentration of convection over the Yucatan is an mid level circulation just like a couple of days ago. I see a definitive low level cyclonic rotation in the low cloud field over the south central Gulf of Mexico well north of the Yucatan. If you can go to this link: http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/ which is the Interactive satellite site go to the 1km visible imagery and look near 24N and 89W. If you use animation you will clearly see the surface low in the central Gulf void of deep convection. All I can find is SE winds and rising pressure over the Yucatan now. I personally believe IF a surface circulation were to form it would have to be over the central Gulf. It's as if the energy is being pulled rapidly northward towards 95L and what is being tracked near Cancun is another mid level circulation just like the one that formed on July 4th. Does anyone else see this also?



I see what you mean at 24N/89W. 850mb vorticity in this area is high. Pressure is rising, though, 1016/1014 in the area. Not much convection on visible. Shear has let up in the past 3 hours in the immediate vicinity. Looks like 95L remnants sucking the water vapour from 96L, replacing the drier air in the gulf.
Last edited by TYNI on Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#338 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:41 am

Regardless of what 96L does in terms of development it looks like it'll be a very rainy set-up if it brings up as much moisture as it currently has.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#339 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:47 am

Image

Latest
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#340 Postby Sanibel » Tue Jul 06, 2010 10:04 am

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.





If we interpolate Alex directly 96L should develop into a hurricane before shore wherever it landfalls in the Gulf.

The convection behavior is definitely persistence with a consolidating central convection area. Alex did this as well before it developed into a cyclone.


96L will hit a cool water pocket off Yucatan so the rebound should be delayed.


.
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests