ATL : TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - MODELS

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL : TROPICAL STORM ALEX - MODELS

#1921 Postby Ikester » Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:56 pm

Okay, I have a question...

For a forecast with below average confidence, don't you think the NHC is being VERY confident issuing warnings nearly 48 hours in advance and watches up even earlier. There appears to be a shift to the north in the models and I can't understand why so much confidence is being put into a storm that is not behaving. Can anybody help me with this??????????
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL : TROPICAL STORM ALEX - MODELS

#1922 Postby tolakram » Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:58 pm

Ikester wrote:Okay, I have a question...

For a forecast with below average confidence, don't you think the NHC is being VERY confident issuing warnings nearly 48 hours in advance and watches up even earlier. There appears to be a shift to the north in the models and I can't understand why so much confidence is being put into a storm that is not behaving. Can anybody help me with this??????????


It's in the rule book, basically. If the forecast call for landfall in 48 hours warnings are issues, right or wrong. It really works best that way, and if needed they will be shifted.
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL : TROPICAL STORM ALEX - MODELS

#1923 Postby Wx_Warrior » Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:59 pm

Image
0 likes   

Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL : TROPICAL STORM ALEX - MODELS

#1924 Postby Ikester » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:05 pm

tolakram wrote:
Ikester wrote:Okay, I have a question...

For a forecast with below average confidence, don't you think the NHC is being VERY confident issuing warnings nearly 48 hours in advance and watches up even earlier. There appears to be a shift to the north in the models and I can't understand why so much confidence is being put into a storm that is not behaving. Can anybody help me with this??????????


It's in the rule book, basically. If the forecast call for landfall in 48 hours warnings are issues, right or wrong. It really works best that way, and if needed they will be shifted.


You completely missed the point. The "rule" is a warning is issued 36 hours in advance. We're clearly outside that window. And for such a "low confidence forecast, issuing a warning now, seems to be rather confident.
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL : TROPICAL STORM ALEX - MODELS

#1925 Postby tolakram » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:12 pm

Ikester wrote:You completely missed the point. The "rule" is a warning is issued 36 hours in advance. We're clearly outside that window. And for such a "low confidence forecast, issuing a warning now, seems to be rather confident.


I'm so sorry I completely missed the point. :|

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/HAW2/english/fo ... ings.shtml

I'm not going to bother looking further for you, but I suspect that they expect hurricane conditions in 36 hours. Watches are 48, I got that wrong.
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145303
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL : TROPICAL STORM ALEX - MODELS

#1926 Postby cycloneye » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:13 pm

tolakram wrote:
Ikester wrote:You completely missed the point. The "rule" is a warning is issued 36 hours in advance. We're clearly outside that window. And for such a "low confidence forecast, issuing a warning now, seems to be rather confident.


I'm so sorry I completely missed the point. :|

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/HAW2/english/fo ... ings.shtml

I'm not going to bother looking further for you, but I suspect that they expect hurricane conditions in 36 hours. Watches are 48, I got that wrong.


Alex is a large system.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#1927 Postby brunota2003 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:16 pm

Not only that...but with the potential for further strengthening than what the models say, you want to get as much lead time as possible so people prepare.
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: ATL : TROPICAL STORM ALEX - MODELS

#1928 Postby clfenwi » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:16 pm

Ikester wrote:
tolakram wrote:
Ikester wrote:Okay, I have a question...

For a forecast with below average confidence, don't you think the NHC is being VERY confident issuing warnings nearly 48 hours in advance and watches up even earlier. There appears to be a shift to the north in the models and I can't understand why so much confidence is being put into a storm that is not behaving. Can anybody help me with this??????????


It's in the rule book, basically. If the forecast call for landfall in 48 hours warnings are issues, right or wrong. It really works best that way, and if needed they will be shifted.


You completely missed the point. The "rule" is a warning is issued 36 hours in advance. We're clearly outside that window. And for such a "low confidence forecast, issuing a warning now, seems to be rather confident.


Warnings are set 36 hours in advance of the anticipated onset of tropical-storm-force winds, in front of the hurricane conditions, not arrival of the hurricane itself.
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: ATL : TROPICAL STORM ALEX - MODELS

#1929 Postby clfenwi » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:23 pm

Moving on....

... time to watch the 00Z dynamic models roll in. Will Alex' recent movement/drift north shift the model guidance? Will the enhancement of upper-air data cause any changes (hope it doesn't result in the spread widening!)? Will Rock get some sleep tonight or will he just have to see what the Euro does? All that and more coming up!
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL : TROPICAL STORM ALEX - MODELS

#1930 Postby ROCK » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:24 pm

clfenwi wrote:Moving on....

... time to watch the 00Z dynamic models roll in. Will Alex' recent movement/drift north shift the model guidance? Will the enhancement of upper-air data cause any changes (hope it doesn't result in the spread widening!)? Will Rock get some sleep tonight or will he just have to see what the Euro does? All that and more coming up!



I have plane to Denver tomorrow at 9am....NOT staying up late tonight...
0 likes   

Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL : TROPICAL STORM ALEX - MODELS

#1931 Postby Ikester » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:26 pm

clfenwi wrote:Moving on....

... time to watch the 00Z dynamic models roll in. Will Alex' recent movement/drift north shift the model guidance? Will the enhancement of upper-air data cause any changes (hope it doesn't result in the spread widening!)? Will Rock get some sleep tonight or will he just have to see what the Euro does? All that and more coming up!


hahahaha, i think ROCK getting sleep tonight is as likely as Alex hitting Tampa. People who go to bed when we have this on our hands are NOT TRUE WEATHER JUNKIES, ROCK! (sounds like a dare, Harry!--dumb and dumber)
0 likes   

User avatar
Comanche
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 381
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:33 am
Location: Clear Lake City Texas

Re: ATL : TROPICAL STORM ALEX - MODELS

#1932 Postby Comanche » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:27 pm

ROCK wrote:
clfenwi wrote:Moving on....

... time to watch the 00Z dynamic models roll in. Will Alex' recent movement/drift north shift the model guidance? Will the enhancement of upper-air data cause any changes (hope it doesn't result in the spread widening!)? Will Rock get some sleep tonight or will he just have to see what the Euro does? All that and more coming up!



I have plane to Denver tomorrow at 9am....NOT staying up late tonight...


Evacuating already Rock? I guess we know where you lean with Alex.
Last edited by Comanche on Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL : TROPICAL STORM ALEX - MODELS

#1933 Postby ROCK » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:28 pm

Ikester wrote:
clfenwi wrote:Moving on....

... time to watch the 00Z dynamic models roll in. Will Alex' recent movement/drift north shift the model guidance? Will the enhancement of upper-air data cause any changes (hope it doesn't result in the spread widening!)? Will Rock get some sleep tonight or will he just have to see what the Euro does? All that and more coming up!


hahahaha, i think ROCK getting sleep tonight is as likely as Alex hitting Tampa. People who go to bed when we have this on our hands are NOT TRUE WEATHER JUNKIES, ROCK! (sounds like a dare, Harry!--dumb and dumber)



:lol: I guess I could sleep on the plane....ugh....
0 likes   

Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL : TROPICAL STORM ALEX - MODELS

#1934 Postby Ikester » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:30 pm

ROCK wrote:
Ikester wrote:
clfenwi wrote:Moving on....

... time to watch the 00Z dynamic models roll in. Will Alex' recent movement/drift north shift the model guidance? Will the enhancement of upper-air data cause any changes (hope it doesn't result in the spread widening!)? Will Rock get some sleep tonight or will he just have to see what the Euro does? All that and more coming up!


hahahaha, i think ROCK getting sleep tonight is as likely as Alex hitting Tampa. People who go to bed when we have this on our hands are NOT TRUE WEATHER JUNKIES, ROCK! (sounds like a dare, Harry!--dumb and dumber)



:lol: I guess I could sleep on the plane....ugh....


Atta Boy! :lol: :lol:
0 likes   

Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL : TROPICAL STORM ALEX - MODELS

#1935 Postby Ikester » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:32 pm

GFS is running. I'm really intrigued (as I have been EVERY SINGLE OTHER RUN). Will there be a shift? Will the more poleward motion prevail? Will the sampled data from the recon prove to be of consequence to the forecast models? (Bites nails)
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL : TROPICAL STORM ALEX - MODELS

#1936 Postby brunota2003 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:33 pm

I'm still sticking with my Galveston to Brownsville area that I said last night. I feel confident the models will shift to the north and come into agreement somewhere around there. It is a huge area, but with the lack of picking a place by the models, along with uncertainty of what they will do will tons of new data for the 00Z runs, will just keep it as is.

-----
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL : TROPICAL STORM ALEX - MODELS

#1937 Postby Ikester » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:34 pm

brunota2003 wrote:I'm still sticking with my Galveston to Brownsville area that I said last night. I feel confident the models will shift to the north and come into agreement somewhere around there. It is a huge area, but with the lack of picking a place by the models, along with uncertainty of what they will do will tons of new data for the 00Z runs, will just keep it as is.

-----
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


I'm sorry, I'm just still amazed at the warning for such a low confidence forecast. I can't seem to move past it. Well, it'll be one hell of a victory for the NHC if they are right!
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL : TROPICAL STORM ALEX - MODELS

#1938 Postby HouTXmetro » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:36 pm

Ikester wrote:
brunota2003 wrote:I'm still sticking with my Galveston to Brownsville area that I said last night. I feel confident the models will shift to the north and come into agreement somewhere around there. It is a huge area, but with the lack of picking a place by the models, along with uncertainty of what they will do will tons of new data for the 00Z runs, will just keep it as is.

-----
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


I'm sorry, I'm just still amazed at the warning for such a low confidence forecast. I can't seem to move past it. Well, it'll be one hell of a victory for the NHC if they are right!


Despite staying in the cone I think the NHC was way wrong for Ike...they had him threatening Florida. That never materialized.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#1939 Postby brunota2003 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:37 pm

They've got to warn though...and like they said:

"GIVEN THE LATEST 36-HR FORECAST POINT AND THE EXTENT OF
TROPICAL-STORM FORCE WINDS IN THE FORECAST...IT IS TIME TO UPGRADE
THE HURRICANE WATCH FOR TO A HURRICANE WARNING FOR THE SOUTH TEXAS
AND NORTHEAST MEXICAN COASTS."
0 likes   

rockyman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1967
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:24 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

#1940 Postby rockyman » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:37 pm

GFS--NNE for 6 hours, then sharp left turn thru 18 hours, then stall thru 24...
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests