ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22980
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1161 Postby wxman57 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:26 pm

Nederlander wrote:maybe someone can help me understand this.. I am looking at the IR shortwave loop and to me it appears the LLC is near 16N-78W.. isnt this farther east than where we thought it was?


You won't be able to find any LLC using IR imagery tonight. And what we're seeing are indications that an LLC may be forming, it's quite weak. Can only find it with high-res visible imagery and/or surface obs.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1162 Postby Air Force Met » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:28 pm

wxman57 wrote:No reason to upgrade before recon gets there tomorrow afternoon. There would have to be quite compelling surface obs to do so beforehand.



I agree...and short of something that is undeniable...that's probably what will happen.
0 likes   

Nederlander
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1250
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:28 pm
Location: Conroe, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1163 Postby Nederlander » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:36 pm

slightly OT: anybody thats anxious to see something pretty.. go take a look at a vis loop of celia.. wow
0 likes   

SunnyThoughts
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2263
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Pensacola, Florida

#1164 Postby SunnyThoughts » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:38 pm

AFM and Wxman57.... Do you think if this is upgraded tomorrow, as both of you seem to think is probable, Will the calls go out to the relief workers in the gulf, digging the relief wells, to batten down and get to shore? Or will it depend on trends in the models as possibly the storm could actually miss that area to the WEST or be a very weak system if some of the models are correct? I guess i'm wondering if you think enough lead time will be in play, for them to wait longer than a day or so to decide what to do as it takes quite a while for them to shut everything down and get to safety..
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1165 Postby Dean4Storms » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:39 pm

Nederlander wrote:slightly OT: anybody thats anxious to see something pretty.. go take a look at a vis loop of celia.. wow

Really impressive!
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4227
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1166 Postby South Texas Storms » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:41 pm

Irak are you worried at all about 93L hitting corpus?
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#1167 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:44 pm

Given its current direction, there are only two reasonable analogs - the 1921 and 1922 tropical storms. I don't see it going into the oil spill zone or anywhere farther east. I'd say either a Texas or Mexico system (with two Mexican landfalls the most likely scenario IMO).
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22980
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#1168 Postby wxman57 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:44 pm

SunnyThoughts wrote:AFM and Wxman57.... Do you think if this is upgraded tomorrow, as both of you seem to think is probable, Will the calls go out to the relief workers in the gulf, digging the relief wells, to batten down and get to shore? Or will it depend on trends in the models as possibly the storm could actually miss that area to the WEST or be a very weak system if some of the models are correct? I guess i'm wondering if you think enough lead time will be in play, for them to wait longer than a day or so to decide what to do as it takes quite a while for them to shut everything down and get to safety..


Can't talk a lot about that, as I'm participating in conference calls with them. What I can say is that they're paying very close attention to this disturbance and I've told them that the earliest that they might see squalls which could shut down helicopter evacuation operations is on Tuesday. They won't stay on location if there is a significant threat of a TS/H heading their way. And it'll be a VERY big deal if they have to abandon the capturing of oil and the relief wells. Let's hope it heads to Mexico and/or it doesn't develop.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: Re:

#1169 Postby Air Force Met » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:46 pm

wxman57 wrote:Can't talk a lot about that, as I'm participating in conference calls with them. What I can say is that they're paying very close attention to this disturbance and I've told them that the earliest that they might see squalls which could shut down helicopter evacuation operations is on Tuesday. They won't stay on location if there is a significant threat of a TS/H heading their way. And it'll be a VERY big deal if they have to abandon the capturing of oil and the relief wells. Let's hope it heads to Mexico and/or it doesn't develop.


I can't really talk about it either...since I am in the loop on the DHS/NORTHCOM side of the house...but what :uarrow: said...
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4227
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1170 Postby South Texas Storms » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:46 pm

wxman57, should i be worried about feeling effects from this system from corpus christi to san antonio?
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29113
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1171 Postby vbhoutex » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:47 pm

If there is an LLC to be seen I would place it at 16.5N, 82.5W, not any further East. 93L is definitely wrapping up now. Visibles should be very telling in the morning if this system really doing what it appears to be doing. Looks like an interesting weekend ahead for GOMers.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

SunnyThoughts
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2263
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Pensacola, Florida

#1172 Postby SunnyThoughts » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:48 pm

Thanks wxman57 for the reply, I share your sentiments in that last sentence of your text.
0 likes   

User avatar
dixiebreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5140
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: crystal river, fla.

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1173 Postby dixiebreeze » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:49 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22980
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1174 Postby wxman57 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:49 pm

South Texas Storms wrote:wxman57, should i be worried about feeling effects from this system from corpus christi to san antonio?


I wouldn't worry in San Antonio. May be some rain for Texas next week. Odds are after crossing the Yucatan that it won't have enough time to really organize into a strong hurricane prior to landfall if it heads to northern MX or south TX.
0 likes   

User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 58
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1175 Postby lrak » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:49 pm

South Texas Storms wrote:Irak are you worried at all about 93L hitting corpus?


You bet I am, its too hot not to have electricity. In my younger day I would welcome any storm. Waves from storm swell in S. Pardre are awesome. As good as the Pacific breaks.

Anyone think the swell and tides from any storm west of the oil won't push water to the N and Eastern Gulf? Higher tides! It seems any big storm in the Gulf this year is going to be nasty :x
0 likes   
AKA karl

Also
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts on this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. My posts are my basic observations and are definitely not backed by any "well some" meteorological knowledge. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4227
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1176 Postby South Texas Storms » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:50 pm

ok thanks. so i shouldnt expect any strong winds here because it wont be that strong if and when it hits the texas coast?
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4227
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1177 Postby South Texas Storms » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:51 pm

lrak wrote:
South Texas Storms wrote:Irak are you worried at all about 93L hitting corpus?


You bet I am, its too hot not to have electricity. In my younger day I would welcome any storm. Waves from storm swell in S. Pardre are awesome. As good as the Pacific breaks.

Anyone think the swell and tides from any storm west of the oil won't push water to the N and Eastern Gulf? Higher tides! It seems any big storm in the Gulf this year is going to be nasty :x


Yeah i think corpus is due for a hurricane. You guys havnt had a direct hit in a while right?
0 likes   

User avatar
dixiebreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5140
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: crystal river, fla.

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1178 Postby dixiebreeze » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:54 pm

Tropical Weather Statements
903
NOUS42 KNHC 241445
WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHTS
CARCAH, NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER, MIAMI, FL.
1045 AM EDT THU 24 JUNE 2010
SUBJECT: TROPICAL CYCLONE PLAN OF THE DAY (TCPOD)
VALID 25/1100Z TO 26/1100Z JUNE 2010
TCPOD NUMBER.....10-024

I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
1. SUSPECT AREA (WESTERN CARIBBEAN)
FLIGHT ONE - TEAL 70
A. 25/1800Z
B. AFXXX 01AAA INVEST
C. 25/1430Z
D. 17.5N 83.0W
E. 25/1730Z TO 25/2200Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT

FLIGHT TWO - TEAL 71
A. 26/0600Z
B. AFXXX 0201A CYCLONE
C. 26/0200Z
D. 18.0N 84.5W
E. 26/0500Z TO 26/090
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1179 Postby KWT » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:56 pm

Will be good to finally see recon flying for the first time this season!

93L still looking pretty good at least on IR!
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1180 Postby srainhoutx » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:57 pm

Thanks guys. Your input is appreciated.
0 likes   
Carla/Alicia/Jerry(In The Eye)/Michelle/Charley/Ivan/Dennis/Katrina/Rita/Wilma/Ike/Harvey

Member: National Weather Association
Wx Infinity Forums
http://wxinfinity.com/index.php

Facebook.com/WeatherInfinity
Twitter @WeatherInfinity


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests