ATL : TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - MODELS

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
somethingfunny
ChatStaff
ChatStaff
Posts: 3926
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
Location: McKinney, Texas

#581 Postby somethingfunny » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:59 am

Sounds like Dolly v.2
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#582 Postby Wx_Warrior » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:59 am

Don't miscount $$$ in the morning! LOL
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38090
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#583 Postby Brent » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:59 am

ROCK wrote:and I stayed up for this.....NO more I tell you... :lol:


LOL!
0 likes   
#neversummer

Weatherfreak000

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#584 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:59 am

The spread will probably shift more towards the right and away from mexico. we've been through this time and time again...EURO is a west outlier... HWRF is a right outlier. What's NOGAPS say?
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#585 Postby South Texas Storms » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:00 am

the models are driving me crazy! i just want to know where this thing is going already! dont yall feel the same?
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#586 Postby southerngale » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:01 am

ROCK wrote:and I stayed up for this.....NO more I tell you... :lol:


Yeah, right. See you tomorrow night. Same time, same place. :)
0 likes   
Please support Storm2k by making a donation today. It is greatly appreciated! Click here: Image

Image my Cowboys Image my RocketsImage my Astros

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#587 Postby ROCK » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:01 am

Ivanhater wrote:Well...the spread in the models continues



I blame you Ivan... :D night night time for me....


Peace out
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#588 Postby Ivanhater » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:01 am

southerngale wrote:
South Texas Storms wrote:so the spread now is anywhere from mexico to new orleans it appears...
that sure is a big spread

Mexico to Florida! Crazy.


Yep, Euro is furthest south with Mexico...HWRF furthers east around Destin, Florida....glad we got it narrowed down tonight.
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#589 Postby South Texas Storms » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:02 am

Weatherfreak000 wrote:The spread will probably shift more towards the right and away from mexico. we've been through this time and time again...EURO is a west outlier... HWRF is a right outlier. What's NOGAPS say?


the nogaps is actually my favorite model presently. it has a weak tropical system moving wnw into south texas!
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#590 Postby southerngale » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:02 am

South Texas Storms wrote:the models are driving me crazy! i just want to know where this thing is going already! dont yall feel the same?

If you're going to track tropical systems, particularly something that hasn't even developed yet, you're going to have to learn some patience, or you'll drive yourself and the rest of us crazy.
0 likes   
Please support Storm2k by making a donation today. It is greatly appreciated! Click here: Image

Image my Cowboys Image my RocketsImage my Astros

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#591 Postby South Texas Storms » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:03 am

southerngale wrote:
South Texas Storms wrote:the models are driving me crazy! i just want to know where this thing is going already! dont yall feel the same?

If you're going to track tropical systems, particularly something that hasn't even developed yet, you're going to have to learn some patience, or you'll drive yourself and the rest of us crazy.


haha yeah i know. this helps me to get up in the morning though!
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#592 Postby ROCK » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:09 am

0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#593 Postby South Texas Storms » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:15 am

is there a chance that this system doesnt develop at all?
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#594 Postby KWT » Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:49 am

Very interesting ECM run, looks like it hits somewhere close to where Bret/Stan made landfall in 2005. ECM looks way too slow to landfall, will probably be inland in 48hrs or so...also makes something of the leftovers behind 93L as well...

Anyway year there is a lot of spread, I feel the westerly models are more likely given the models that recurve are showing one hell of a trough which I think is overdone.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3999
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

Re:

#595 Postby AJC3 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:08 am

KWT wrote:Very interesting ECM run, looks like it hits somewhere close to where Bret/Stan made landfall in 2005. ECM looks way too slow to landfall, will probably be inland in 48hrs or so...also makes something of the leftovers behind 93L as well...

Anyway year there is a lot of spread, I feel the westerly models are more likely given the models that recurve are showing one hell of a trough which I think is overdone.


The 24/00Z ECM actually brings 93L inland near Veracruz, MX Tuesday morning. The system that it brings up to near Brownsville on 3 July is actually the leftovers that you mention. The model spins up the second low between 150 and 180 hours out as it crosses from east of the Yucatan to the Bay of Campeche.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#596 Postby KWT » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:10 am

Oh I know, I mean the ECM is way to slow on the first landfall, this will probably be nearly on the other side of the Yucatan by 72hrs, yet alone not even on land for its first hit, the rate its going at now it'll be inland by 48-60hrs...small differences but might make all the difference to this system.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#597 Postby ronjon » Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:51 am

What I don't understand is why the HWRF has consistently shown hurricane type pressures (below 990 mb) yet only tropical storm force winds - any explaination from the METs would be helpful.

http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/hwrftc2.cgi?time=2010062400-invest93l&field=Sea+Level+Pressure&hour=Animation
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#598 Postby KWT » Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:01 am

Ah the HWRF has a very poor pressure-wind relationship because the way it is created, I wouldb't use the HWRF for the pressure but for the wind speeds.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#599 Postby gatorcane » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:54 am

It looks like the ECMWF and GFS are now both showing a wave that heads west through the Yucatan and into the BOC. The ECMWF develops a weak TS in the BOC and pushes it into Mexico. The GFS just pushes the wave into Mexico. At this point I like the consistency I am seeing with the global models and the solution from these models has been the one I have gone with for 93L since the beginning.

Looking through the posts, I am not sure why so many put down the GFS when it appears the ECMWF has veered towards the GFS solution? I do like the ECMWF as well but it's hard to believe it when one run it shows a major hurricane in the GOM and another completely drops that solution. The GFS has been consistent run after run with 93L.
Last edited by gatorcane on Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#600 Postby KWT » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:56 am

Yeah I agree at least with the track idea, but as Wxman57 said its because the models are showing a different wave now trying to develop, the lead wave that is 93L is not the one that is needed to be watched but the one to its east.

That explains the sudden shift well southwards again of the ECM because a system further east doesn't get scooped up by the weakness that is impinged.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests