ATL : TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - MODELS

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
wxwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1606
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Keene, NH
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#481 Postby wxwatcher91 » Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:57 pm

Starting to look like something now on satellite. The original LLC is WAAAY west and out of the picture. Even the NHC doesnt outline it in the TWO. It's the MLC and the divergence maximum that matters, and it looks like they're starting to get along.

Models still initializing 93L with the LLC. 18z was at 16.6N 78.6W

Unless a new invest is named, 00z should initialize somewhere near 17N/73W, a full 5 degrees east lol
0 likes   

User avatar
CourierPR
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1335
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Pompano Beach, Florida

Re:

#482 Postby CourierPR » Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:58 pm

gatorcane wrote:The ECMWF run has now aligned itself with the GFS as I expected. The trend is definitely more west with the models as large-scale ridging looks like it will build in from the Central plains SE towards the GOM, at least that is what the global consensus is at the moment. The difference is that the ECMWF develops a stronger system that goes into Mexico while the GFS keeps the system into Mexico as a wave.

You always try to post in an authoritative manner, as though you are a meteorologist. Do you have a degree in meteorology or atmospheric science?
Last edited by CourierPR on Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#483 Postby HouTXmetro » Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:11 pm

ROCK wrote:BAMMS following the EURO...


actually the EURO followed the BAMMS.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
KFDM Meteorologist
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1314
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:52 pm
Location: Upper Texas Coast/Orange County

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#484 Postby KFDM Meteorologist » Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:15 pm

Wise choice. GFS is horrible.
0 likes   

User avatar
CourierPR
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1335
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Pompano Beach, Florida

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#485 Postby CourierPR » Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:23 pm

Just finished watching a video featuring two AccuWeather meteorologists, sans JB, who deliver a careful analysis of 93L and its potential development into next week, using NHC models and the GFDL. They forecast conditions conducive for development and a more northerly track. They said that the GFDL model has been a reliable model in the past. The video can be sourced on the free site.
0 likes   

User avatar
bvigal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2276
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:49 am
Location: British Virgin Islands
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#486 Postby bvigal » Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:27 pm

KFDM Meteorologist wrote:Wise choice. GFS is horrible.
Agree! And nothing new, in my opinion. GFS is our main daily weather model here, I look at it every single day, 365/yr for wind, direction, precip and each day get to see how close it was (vs the NAM) in predicting our weather - it's pretty good. But, in 11 hurricane seasons, I've found myself paying less and less attention to it concerning tropical formation.
0 likes   

User avatar
KFDM Meteorologist
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1314
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:52 pm
Location: Upper Texas Coast/Orange County

#487 Postby KFDM Meteorologist » Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:28 pm

EURO has always been our first model of choice for Tropics.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#488 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:39 pm

You gotta love Accuweather for their dramatics. They go with the outlier model that brings 93L closer to the states. We shall see.

CourierPR wrote:Just finished watching a video featuring two AccuWeather meteorologists, sans JB, who deliver a careful analysis of 93L and its potential development into next week, using NHC models and the GFDL. They forecast conditions conducive for development and a more northerly track. They said that the GFDL model has been a reliable model in the past. The video can be sourced on the free site.
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#489 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:51 pm

Stormcenter wrote:You gotta love Accuweather for their dramatics. They go with the outlier model that brings 93L closer to the states. We shall see.

CourierPR wrote:Just finished watching a video featuring two AccuWeather meteorologists, sans JB, who deliver a careful analysis of 93L and its potential development into next week, using NHC models and the GFDL. They forecast conditions conducive for development and a more northerly track. They said that the GFDL model has been a reliable model in the past. The video can be sourced on the free site.



Two things are gonna happen here probably:

1. It develops in the 54 hour timeframe...still a long time from now....the models seem to be respecting the shear here...the GFDL just believes it can fire up when it closed off days from now. Indeed when it makes it to 80W it'll be under absurdly high SST's and heat potential. It could be Rapid Intensification, in which case the GFS and EURO solutions are foiled. Florida then a possible target if your following the HWRF...I personally dislike it.

2. It continues to stagnant and not gain much latitude, slam into the Yucatan and then, depending on its intensity when it hits the Yucatan can definitely gain alot of latitiude and strike just about anywhere in Mexico or Texas...or even swing back towards the Central Gulf.


I'm fascinated by these invests this year. The Climatology almost seems through out the window half the time and we hardly even notice it. 93L is an exercise of strict timing, all of which is necessary for model input.


Edit: Wxman57, if your reading this I have a question just a thought. If you thought development would occur by tomorrow or friday and it potentially happening on saturday having a huge effect as far as verifying the GFDL?
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#490 Postby Ivanhater » Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:27 pm

Dynamical models. Of course , this depending on if something develops. I don't know why it cant consolidate.

Image
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

Re: Re:

#491 Postby Aquawind » Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:50 pm

CourierPR wrote:
gatorcane wrote:The ECMWF run has now aligned itself with the GFS as I expected. The trend is definitely more west with the models as large-scale ridging looks like it will build in from the Central plains SE towards the GOM, at least that is what the global consensus is at the moment. The difference is that the ECMWF develops a stronger system that goes into Mexico while the GFS keeps the system into Mexico as a wave.

You always try to post in an authoritative manner, as though you are a meteorologist. Do you have a degree in meteorology or atmospheric science?



Nahh. He does good job posting.. He just slept at a Holiday Inn Express last night and is feeling 100%.. :lol: :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#492 Postby HouTXmetro » Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:57 pm

Ivanhater wrote:Dynamical models. Of course , this depending on if something develops. I don't know why it cant consolidate.

Image


BIG IF
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#493 Postby KWT » Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:02 pm

To be fair the 12z ECM looks fairly realisitic to me, I think thats the most likely track as well, because I think the GFS suite of models are somewhat being ambitous with the upper trough. Either way your going to get moisture into texas as Darby comes up as well.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5899
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#494 Postby MGC » Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:21 pm

GFDL brings a fairly stong TC into central Louisiana on the 12Z run. GFS don't even have Darby plotted. Nogaps brings a weak TC into western La. We shall see. 93L is still a mess.......MGC
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#495 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:23 pm

At this point, I'm not sure if it will even recurve at all...it might just head into Central America and develop in the EPAC...
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#496 Postby KWT » Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:42 pm

I'm pretty sure it'll gain enough latitude in time Crazy fo it to not really be an issue in the EPAC, even the ECM which is the furtherest south would still not emerge south enough for that to occur...

What is the GFDL showing at the moment, and when is the 18z run out for it?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re:

#497 Postby tolakram » Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:42 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:At this point, I'm not sure if it will even recurve at all...it might just head into Central America and develop in the EPAC...


Might want to look at the wider view. Due west right now takes it deep into Mexico. :)
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#498 Postby Ivanhater » Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:51 pm

Just a note from the NHC DISCO on Darby about the GFS...

BOTH THE GFS AND
GFS-PARALLEL RUNS TAKE A RATHER ANEMIC LOOKING DARBY QUICKLY
WESTWARD...WHICH ONCE AGAIN APPEARS TO BE DUE TO POOR MODEL
INITIALIZATION.
0 likes   
Michael

lonelymike
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 634
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:12 am
Location: walton county fla

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#499 Postby lonelymike » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:06 pm

Looks like 93 is deciding between Cajun or Tex-Mex :D
0 likes   


GO SEMINOLES

User avatar
Rockin4NOLA
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 42
Age: 35
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 9:44 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#500 Postby Rockin4NOLA » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:08 pm

lonelymike wrote:Looks like 93 is deciding between Cajun or Tex-Mex :D


Haha well thats one way of putting it...we'll know how "hungry" it is soon enough.
0 likes   
Proud to call New Orleans home. NOLA forever.


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests