ATL : TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - MODELS

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#301 Postby HouTXmetro » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:43 pm

thanks
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#302 Postby Ivanhater » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:46 pm

One hell of a trough on the 18Z GFS

Image
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#303 Postby HouTXmetro » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:50 pm

Is that even plausible? such a trough in June?
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#304 Postby wxman57 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:55 pm

Looks like the MLC just south of Haiti is losing its convection. Convection is increasing near the lower-level vorticity center near 15.5N/75W, the feature identified on the 18Z model initialization. No evidence of any LLC, though. Have to wait another 48 hours, at least.

I notice that the EC, GFS and Canadian all indicate the ridge over the central Gulf coast weakening significantly by the weekend. EC and CMC develop a moderate trof across the central and NW Gulf then. Such a feature could turn this system north and eventually even NNE. Question is - where is it when it turns northward? Farther west and the TX coast is threatened. Farther east and it could hit the mid Gulf coast (SE LA to MS). Of course, this assumes something does develop.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#305 Postby brunota2003 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:04 pm

*IF* the convection increases with the dmax here in a few hours, won't that increase the rotation, which would create positive feedback into the system and then continue to come together?
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#306 Postby Ivanhater » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:05 pm

wxman57 wrote:Looks like the MLC just south of Haiti is losing its convection. Convection is increasing near the lower-level vorticity center near 15.5N/75W, the feature identified on the 18Z model initialization. No evidence of any LLC, though. Have to wait another 48 hours, at least.

I notice that the EC, GFS and Canadian all indicate the ridge over the central Gulf coast weakening significantly by the weekend. EC and CMC develop a moderate trof across the central and NW Gulf then. Such a feature could turn this system north and eventually even NNE. Question is - where is it when it turns northward? Farther west and the TX coast is threatened. Farther east and it could hit the mid Gulf coast (SE LA to MS). Of course, this assumes something does develop.



Sounds reasonable. The 18z GFS does have strong shear in the western and northern gulf though
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#307 Postby KWT » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:07 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:Is that even plausible? such a trough in June?


Its an extreme solution thats for sure, I'd be surprised, esp given the GFS has a bad habit of digging troughs way down south in the longer ranges.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

lonelymike
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 634
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:12 am
Location: walton county fla

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#308 Postby lonelymike » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:08 pm

Anyone got one of those cool tropical cyclone track maps from like 50 B.C through the present day of June Cyclone tracks?


BTW Ivan keep doing that hurricane dance. Need to send this Rocks way :D
0 likes   


GO SEMINOLES

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#309 Postby Ivanhater » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:14 pm

18z Nogaps turns NE at the end of the run but is awfully fast and sheared

Image
0 likes   
Michael

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#310 Postby clfenwi » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:17 pm

Ivanhater wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:Alt version???? what do you mean?


This runs right along with the other version. Seems like it is calibrated a little differently, but actually keeps 93l on this run with the other models

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwpara ... arib.shtml


My understanding is that what's currently running as the parallel GFS is the upgrade that will become operational in July. Looking at the 192h seems to confirm that.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#311 Postby Ivanhater » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:18 pm

clfenwi wrote:
Ivanhater wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:Alt version???? what do you mean?


This runs right along with the other version. Seems like it is calibrated a little differently, but actually keeps 93l on this run with the other models

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwpara ... arib.shtml


My understanding is that what's currently running as the parallel GFS is the upgrade that will become operational in July. Looking at the 192h seems to confirm that.


Seems like it, much more detailed throughout the period.
0 likes   
Michael

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#312 Postby clfenwi » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:18 pm

lonelymike wrote:Anyone got one of those cool tropical cyclone track maps from like 50 B.C through the present day of June Cyclone tracks?


BTW Ivan keep doing that hurricane dance. Need to send this Rocks way :D



Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#313 Postby KWT » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:20 pm

That shows the two different camps quite nicely, the camp that takes this system up through the Yucatan channel and the models that take it over the Yucatan and into the Gulf (which has gained more support recently)
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#314 Postby wxman57 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:26 pm

18Z GFS 5 day point is near 27N/91W moving just east of due north. Basically, SE LA. What are the odds of it being right before a storm even forms, though?
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#315 Postby Ivanhater » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:35 pm

HWRF STRONGER

Image

GFDL CAT 2 IN Gulf

HOUR:126.0 LONG: -90.79 LAT: 27.26 MIN PRESS (hPa): 966.37 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 86.15
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
KFDM Meteorologist
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1314
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:52 pm
Location: Upper Texas Coast/Orange County

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#316 Postby KFDM Meteorologist » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:37 pm

wxman57 wrote:18Z GFS 5 day point is near 27N/91W moving just east of due north. Basically, SE LA. What are the odds of it being right before a storm even forms, though?
Slim.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#317 Postby Ivanhater » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:37 pm

Ouch..

Image

Image

Image

HWRF

Image
Last edited by Ivanhater on Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29112
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#318 Postby vbhoutex » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:40 pm

GFDL CAT 2 IN Gulf

HOUR:126.0 LONG: -90.79 LAT: 27.26 MIN PRESS (hPa): 966.37 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS): 86.15

I do hope this does not come to pass!! That would be a HORRIBLE position for it to be in.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

lonelymike
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 634
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:12 am
Location: walton county fla

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#319 Postby lonelymike » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:40 pm

Sounds like the trough may be overdone eh?
0 likes   


GO SEMINOLES

User avatar
Comanche
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 381
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:33 am
Location: Clear Lake City Texas

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L - MODELS

#320 Postby Comanche » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:49 pm

If that verifies, you will displace many people for quite awhile as wind driven oil will get far inland, coating everything with toxic crap. Major economic hit not to mention loss of energy/chemical demand. Horrible thought.
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest