ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#361 Postby tolakram » Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:14 pm

It's interesting they downgraded the chance. Here's what my amateur eyes see.

Loop: http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ge ... mframes=12

Image

Key will be if convection dies out again tonight as most of the southern inflow appears to be outflow boundaries from storms near the SA coast.
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

#362 Postby Aquawind » Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:15 pm

What's up with the wave near 35W? Typo or is it going in reverse? lol

Pretty Wavey our there..and it still JUNE..
0 likes   

I-wall
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:24 pm

Re: Re:

#363 Postby I-wall » Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:16 pm

cycloneye wrote:
I-wall wrote:When is the upper level anti-cyclone supposed to develop over 93L?


There is is.

Image


Thank you for that. :D I assume the tan colored lines are showing the pressure differences? If so, it looks like the high is off to the west of 93L. Could this impart some shear onto 93L?
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145308
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#364 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:16 pm

tolakram,that is why it has to go away from the South America influence to have a better chance to develop.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#365 Postby KWT » Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:19 pm

I'm really not sure why they have downed the risk right the way to 20%, I can only assume they believe the highly divergent conditions which is allowing convection to occur where it is will not support the convection for much longer and the position of the upper high isn't condusive enough just yet as its bringing in weak southerly airflow aloft.

That being said the main zone for development is still to the west, I'd think it has a far bigger chance of developing in the W.CAribbean and the Gulf.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
thetruesms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 844
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Tallahasee, FL
Contact:

Re: Re:

#366 Postby thetruesms » Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:22 pm

I-wall wrote:Thank you for that. :D I assume the tan colored lines are showing the pressure differences? If so, it looks like the high is off to the west of 93L. Could this impart some shear onto 93L?
The tan lines are actually streamlines, but since air flow is a function of pressure gradients, you can kind of use it as a proxy. But yes, the upper high is now to the west of 93L - I already forget who, but it was mentioned in a post earlier today that it looked like it was seeing some shear, and it's become even more apparent since then.

edit - it was Sanibel, on a check back.
Last edited by thetruesms on Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:30 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38089
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re:

#367 Postby Brent » Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:23 pm

KWT wrote:I'm really not sure why they have downed the risk right the way to 20%, I can only assume they believe the highly divergent conditions which is allowing convection to occur where it is will not support the convection for much longer and the position of the upper high isn't condusive enough just yet as its bringing in weak southerly airflow aloft.

That being said the main zone for development is still to the west, I'd think it has a far bigger chance of developing in the W.CAribbean and the Gulf.


Yeah, I'm very surprised they went down to 20%, but I guess the better chance was always when it got further west.
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#368 Postby jasons2k » Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:26 pm

You have to remember the 20% is for the next 48 hours.

That's probably about right. IMO chances for development after 48 hours increase substantially. I still think we will see Alex by the end of the week and I see no reason to change that thinking.

Patience, patience, patience is the word for the day. Even the 'bullish' forecasts I have seen with an eventual hurricane in the Gulf don't expect much out of this until it gets past 75 or 80W.
0 likes   

I-wall
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:24 pm

Re:

#369 Postby I-wall » Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:28 pm

HURAKAN wrote:Image

low pressure forecasted to form south of Jamaica


Makes sense since we're starting to see stronger rotation. When is the low forecasted to form?
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#370 Postby KWT » Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:37 pm

Looking at the AVN imagery it just confirms its the shear that is helping to create the convection, nice outflow channel provided by that jet. I think I understand better why the NHC dropped as low as they did, the wave feature is outrunning that convection and the MLC that is with this convection is going to struggle to develop any further than that.

The ECM once again develops the southern portion in the W.Caribbean and hits the Yucatan, looks a little too far south though...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#371 Postby hurricaneCW » Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:40 pm

Shear seems kind of high in the Atlantic right now even for late June. Plus since we are right near La Nina conditions, I'd expect lower than normal shear levels. I wonder what the first week of July will be like in terms of favorable conditions..
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#372 Postby wxman57 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:46 pm

hurricaneCW wrote:Shear seems kind of high in the Atlantic right now even for late June. Plus since we are right near La Nina conditions, I'd expect lower than normal shear levels. I wonder what the first week of July will be like in terms of favorable conditions..


Here's a map of the current shear anomaly across the basin. Shear is about 10kts below normal across the Caribbean and Gulf:
Image

Caribbean shear compared to normal:
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#373 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:54 pm

Loop - http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/flash-rgb.html

Albeit slowly but it seems to be getting better organized
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#374 Postby Blown Away » Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:58 pm

Image http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/tatl/loop-vis.html
IMO, looks like the mid level circulation is just S of Cabo Rojo, DR and moving towards Haiti?
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145308
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#375 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:04 pm

Blown Away, to clarify,South of Barahona, DR. Cabo Rojo is a town in the SW corner of Puerto Rico. :)
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#376 Postby KWT » Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:07 pm

I think there probably is a MLC with that convection, the problem is they are blowing up just south of the jet axis, which means the wave will probably carry on westwards and leave this convective mass behind, if the jet shifts, this convection will soon decay like the northern area did a few hours ago. Nice little curve with it though thats true.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

#377 Postby hurricaneCW » Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:09 pm

Oh I guess since the normal June values are still quite high, it just seems that way. By the way what is the average shear a month from now and August for the Atlantic. Do you have maps for that?
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#378 Postby tolakram » Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:09 pm

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/product ... 211315.GIF

Looking at that loop, which is SW of the apparent MLC, it appears an LLC is developing. Not very many frames to judge, so it could very well be an illusion, but convection seems to be starting to fire around this area.

Image
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#379 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:10 pm

Image

Latest
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#380 Postby Frank2 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:13 pm

0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest