ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 58
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#321 Postby lrak » Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:28 am

Ok so the SW side not the big blob to the North is where the action might start.
0 likes   
AKA karl

Also
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts on this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. My posts are my basic observations and are definitely not backed by any "well some" meteorological knowledge. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#322 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:30 am

lrak wrote:Ok so the SW side not the big blob to the North is where the action might start.

right :) if it can maintain that is..
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#323 Postby Ivanhater » Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:30 am

Stronger thunderstorms today, that should help lower some pressure

Image
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145303
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#324 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:35 am

Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#325 Postby KWT » Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:45 am

This current convective burst maybe able to establish some sort of MLC, it probably won't get the job done in the first asking, it has got time on its side and as it gets further west I think things will be good enough further develop. Like Aric said look for something to possibly develop once west of 75W.

I still think this has a pretty solid chance of being upgraded down the line.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
TreasureIslandFLGal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1581
Age: 57
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 6:16 pm
Location: Clearwater, Florida ~3 miles from the coast now. We finally moved safely off the barrier island!

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#326 Postby TreasureIslandFLGal » Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:46 am

The Northern system could be the real threat. It could travel more NW, gaining some latitude early and taking a path more like yesterday's Euro run. That would not be good for the oil spill.

I believe this will be TD by 6:00am tomorrow. Those waters are just far too warm and this could rapidly get organized if the spin can establish itself just a little during the day today.

Disclosure...yada yada...I'm certainly not a pro nor represent the site...yada yada...follow your local NWS & NOAA guidance...yada yada
0 likes   
Chrissy & Ligeia
:flag:

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#327 Postby Frank2 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:51 am

A possible MLC is seen at 16.5N 70.5W:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/flash-vis.html

per the models, if something should form it seems destined for the Yucatan at least in the short term, though significant shear is to the NW ATTM...
Last edited by Frank2 on Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7182
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: Re:

#328 Postby jlauderdal » Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:53 am

Weatherfreak000 wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:wait till it passes 75 west..



No need, 93L is no longer attached to the ITCZ, as well as it's location as opposed to South America.


I must give you your props Aric, I learned a good lesson from you yesterday. The proximity to South America is a huge factor this early in the season. The latest satellite imagery however suggest in my opinion that 93L is currently looking better than it ever has however. I believe 93L has a decent chance of developing before 75W.


Proximity to SA is a huge factor at anytime on the season. This system has a much better chance west of 75W. I stand by my prediction yesterday, this has Texas in its sights regardless of strength.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#329 Postby Dean4Storms » Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:02 am

Frank2 wrote:A possible MLC is seen at 16.5N 70.5W:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/flash-vis.html

per the models, if something should form it seems destined for the Yucatan at least in the short term, though significant shear is to the NW ATTM...



I think I see a lower level rotation near 15.8N 71.2W
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#330 Postby KWT » Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:06 am

Frank2 wrote:A possible MLC is seen at 16.5N 70.5W:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/flash-vis.html

per the models, if something should form it seems destined for the Yucatan at least in the short term, though significant shear is to the NW ATTM...


Yeah it sure does look like that, it'd make sense as well given the convection that has been present in that area for the last 9-12hrs now.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145303
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#331 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:19 am

0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Florida1118

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#332 Postby Florida1118 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:21 am

Possible tropical cyclone....
0 likes   

User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 58
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#333 Postby lrak » Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:22 am

SURF :P
0 likes   
AKA karl

Also
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts on this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. My posts are my basic observations and are definitely not backed by any "well some" meteorological knowledge. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

I-wall
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:24 pm

#334 Postby I-wall » Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:50 am

When is the upper level anti-cyclone supposed to develop over 93L?
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re:

#335 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:54 am

I-wall wrote:When is the upper level anti-cyclone supposed to develop over 93L?

already has :)
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145303
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re:

#336 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:54 am

I-wall wrote:When is the upper level anti-cyclone supposed to develop over 93L?


There is is.

Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

#337 Postby curtadams » Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:55 am

Definitely an MLC looking at the rgb loop. It's very high, though; it seems to affect high clouds more than low clouds. Even an MLC at the low cloud level often doesn't go to the surface, so this is probably a long way from having an LLC.
0 likes   

coreyl
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 77
Age: 36
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 9:14 pm
Location: Bay St Louis,Mississippi

#338 Postby coreyl » Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:00 pm

I didn't expect this wave to be some big bad storm at this point but I am not impressed by this system so far. Am I missing something?
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#339 Postby Ivanhater » Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:03 pm

Interesting tidbit from Tallahassee NWS if we have a stronger system

"THEN BOTH THE GFS AND 12Z EURO SHOWS THE RIDGING
BREAKING DOWN AS A TROUGH DIGS ALONG THE EASTERN SEABOARD ON
TUESDAY."
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#340 Postby KWT » Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:04 pm

That upper high looks a little too the west of where you'd it to be for the eastern region of convection, just confirms that its probably once again the jet that is causing that convective blow up. If that forcing weakens then I'd imagine the convection may end up decaying again, esp if it can't develop a strong enough circulation in the time.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests