ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Florida1118

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#221 Postby Florida1118 » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:27 pm

ROCK wrote:
Florida1118 wrote:More of the 8pm computer models seem to be moving the system closer to Florida if it develops.


they were left this am and right this evening. Wait for the LLC and then the models should show more consistency....

It looks like one is trying to form but it might be mid.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#222 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:28 pm

Image

Loop - I see the twist!
0 likes   

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#223 Postby Aquawind » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:29 pm

Cdeck81 wrote:Could we see a code red at the 2 AM updated?



I have my doubts..no data suggests such..many would argue they are already overstating it at 50% at this point. There is nothing there yet..but everyone expects conditions to improve even more as it moves into the Western Carib. Now if they find a defined LLC then it goes up..imo.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#224 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:31 pm

Aquawind wrote:
Cdeck81 wrote:Could we see a code red at the 2 AM updated?


I have my doubts..no data suggests such..many would argue they are already overstating it at 50% at this point. There is nothing there yet..but everyone expects conditions to improve even more as it moves into the Western Carib. Now if they find a defined LLC then it goes up..imo.


IMO it will go up by 8 am if convection increases and we see some evidence of at least a stronger MLC
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#225 Postby RL3AO » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:32 pm

Its certainly organizing. Think we could have TD 1 in 48 to 72 hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#226 Postby Aquawind » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:32 pm

:uarrow: Agreed the AM visable could do it..
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5313
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#227 Postby Ptarmigan » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:33 pm

I think we could see a TD soon.
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#228 Postby ozonepete » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:34 pm

Aquawind wrote:
Cdeck81 wrote:Could we see a code red at the 2 AM updated?



I have my doubts..no data suggests such..many would argue they are already overstating it at 50% at this point. There is nothing there yet..but everyone expects conditions to improve even more as it moves into the Western Carib. Now if they find a defined LLC then it goes up..imo.


No way code red at 2AM. Even though there's a spin now, there's no sure way of telling how much of it is at the surface. In addition, it's not doing a nocturnal convective flare-up at all so far. This has a couple of days to go before environmental conditions get really conducive for development.
Last edited by ozonepete on Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Florida1118

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#229 Postby Florida1118 » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:34 pm

Aquawind wrote::uarrow: Agreed the AM visable could do it..

I dont know. Invest 92 looked like it but nevergot it. Then again, It was not in a good place...
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#230 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:35 pm

Image

Interesting ship report. I wonder how accurate it's or if it's just a local effect
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145299
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#231 Postby cycloneye » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:36 pm

The latest image at 2:15 AM UTC or 10:15 PM EDT.You can see some banding features starting to appear.

Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re:

#232 Postby RL3AO » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:37 pm

HURAKAN wrote:Image

Interesting ship report. I wonder how accurate it's or if it's just a local effect


Which one? The 1012 mb one just south of the "I"? Thats just where the trough is from the tropical wave.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: Re:

#233 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:39 pm

RL3AO wrote:Which one? The 1012 mb one just south of the "I"? Thats just where the trough is from the tropical wave.


Ok, that might explain it!
0 likes   

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

#234 Postby Aquawind » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:41 pm

We have to keep in mind the color code is for within 48 hours of that forecast sooo.. it's not falling apart and clearly getting closer to better conditions. So they could make a call of more confidence if they were already at 50%.. We will find out how this % stuff works.. clearly it doesn't seem like it's going to pop overnight..
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#235 Postby clfenwi » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:47 pm

I concur in expecting that the probability will remain unchanged at 2 AM.

It does seem to be the case, in the Atlantic at least, that the NHC is trying to extend its lead time for its "Code Red"/High Probability of formation forecasts so more of the 48 hour forecast period is covered (vice only going Code Red when it's a virtual slam dunk and a TD forms within 12 hours).

Given that a circulation has only recently shown a hint of being apparent, along with the lack of organization convection, I would say it's reasonable to expect a tropical depression being classified no earlier than Wednesday (assuming that there is development, of course).
0 likes   

User avatar
mvtrucking
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 698
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 10:01 am
Location: Monroe,La

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#236 Postby mvtrucking » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:48 pm

Hugo1989 wrote:Este sistema 93L si llegara a ser una depresion tropical para el informe de las 2:00pm de manana. No hay manera que este sistema corra la misma suerte que el 92L. Cual es su impresion de tener 2 sistemas en el pacifico y dos areas en desarrollo en pleno mes de junio??? las antillas mayores sufriran el azote de un sistema, sea tormenta o nivel huracan. en especial Cuba y Puerto Rico.... veo un comienzo de temporada muy irregular y preocupante!!



I believe you are saying that 93L should become a TD by 2 pm tomorrow and not suffer the same fate as 92L did? Also what bearing the 2 Pacific storms will have on 93L if any? Greater Antilles, Cuba & Puerto Rico should bear the brunt of this storm?
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#237 Postby ozonepete » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:53 pm

ronjon wrote:
Not sure land breezes would be important here, though. They would be too local in reach.


I'm talking about inflow from the south which would feed the storm. It's essentially limited by continental dry air of SA. Air currents from a large land mass has less moisture and will lead to greater subsidence.


Sorry, Ronjon, I misunderstood you. Yeah there's definitely dry air coming off the north SA coast. What's especially key is that as the air comes down those high mountains it dries out due to warming from compression on descent. But that air is also moistened quite a bit again as it moves in towards the circulation center and passes over very high SSTs. So some storms come through that region and weaken due to it and some intensify despite it. Guess we'll just have to watch. But I do see your point and it's a good one.
0 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#238 Postby Evil Jeremy » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:54 pm

IMO, 50% is a bit to high, at least for now. Until the convection gets more organized around some sort of center circulation, I believe this has about a 30% of forming within 2 days.
0 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17

User avatar
littlevince
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 768
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:45 am
Location: Portugal

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#239 Postby littlevince » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:54 pm

MIMIC-TPW (12z - 01z)

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

#240 Postby Aquawind » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:57 pm

Hmmmm Next invest near 60W..
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests