I'm still waiting on the direct hit from Bill on N.O.

Frank2 wrote:The GFS does show a change in the pattern towards the end of the 10-day loop, so we'll see:
http://weather.unisys.com/gfsx/loop/gfsx_500p_loop.html
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Frank2 wrote:The GFS does show a change in the pattern towards the end of the 10-day loop, so we'll see:
http://weather.unisys.com/gfsx/loop/gfsx_500p_loop.html
Frank2 wrote:The GFS does show a change in the pattern towards the end of the 10-day loop, so we'll see:
http://weather.unisys.com/gfsx/loop/gfsx_500p_loop.html
Wx_Warrior wrote:This is not a CMC thread. It's garbage anyway. If it were good, NOLA would have already been crushed this season. We all know the best last and this year, EURO.
Troughs are stronger this year so don't put too much emphasis on the "Bermuda High". I think it's future storms that could cause trouble to the US, not this one.
That is interesting about the synoptic pattern, but the other big mitigating factor is apparently several of the models are not developing 94L for some reason. Maybe its the shear that Derek alluded to regarding the divergent tracks produced by the BAM suite. The pattern can be there all day and it won't mean a thing if theres no cyclone to direct westward. Just a thought. We shall see.Ivanhater wrote:12 z Euro not developing much, but does show the pattern change. Trough in the western U.S building ridge in the east
cycloneye wrote:What I see is a somewhat vague model support for 94L so far except for SHIP and CMC that make it a hurricane.The question is why the majority of the models dont see this system developing in a strong way.I dont see big hurdles at this time,such as sal,lower ssts,strong shear.
AtlanticWind wrote:cycloneye wrote:What I see is a somewhat vague model support for 94L so far except for SHIP and CMC that make it a hurricane.The question is why the majority of the models dont see this system developing in a strong way.I dont see big hurdles at this time,such as sal,lower ssts,strong shear.
Dont forget GFDL and HWRF , they do show hurricane from this system
See the last few posts in the models thread. I think the models may be onto something as a prohibitive factor otherwise they would be more bullish on development. As an example apparently they saw inhibiting factors for Ana and the same models were correctly bullish with Bill.cycloneye wrote:What I see is a somewhat vague model support for 94L so far except for SHIP and CMC that make it a hurricane.The question is why the majority of the models dont see this system developing in a strong way.I dont see big hurdles at this time,such as sal,lower ssts,strong shear.
Typhoon_Willie wrote:It will be interesting to watch though. Cycloneye mentioned that the ships model is quite bullish on this system.
Stormcenter wrote:Let's not forget we are in an El Nino season so despite the possible
pattern change conditions may not be so hot for development anyway.
Maybe that's why the model aren't jumping on the development
bandwagon just yet.
AtlanticWind wrote:Stormcenter wrote:Let's not forget we are in an El Nino season so despite the possible
pattern change conditions may not be so hot for development anyway.
Maybe that's why the model aren't jumping on the development
bandwagon just yet.
Most Models are bullish on this , HWRF , GFDL, SHIPS, Canadian model, GFS(somewhat)
Stormcenter wrote:I'm sorry but I don't put too much weight if any on the GFS especially 10 days out.
I'm still waiting on the direct hit from Bill on N.O.Frank2 wrote:The GFS does show a change in the pattern towards the end of the 10-day loop, so we'll see:
http://weather.unisys.com/gfsx/loop/gfsx_500p_loop.html
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests