Of course, as regular readers know, there is heat content, which, best I can tell, is based on integrating the energy content, a function of temperature, from the surface down to the a depth where a certain isotherm occurs, about 26º
Now, it becomes plain from the image below that insolation on the Gulf is not the only factor, and may not even be the primary factor, in energy content.

The Caribbean which gets much higher sun angles in Winter, and far fewer polar front intrusions, seems to be the main factor.
Now, currents are affected by winds (recall seeing a link that current and its relation to wind actually involves a variation of the Coriolis effect, but I digress), so weather patterns besides lots of sunshine and light winds may effect Gulf energy content.
Now, I would argue, that "heat content" alone, assuming similarly favorable conditions of upper level shear, outflow and moisture content, is not as critical to faster moving cyclones. A slow moving Cat 5 Hurricane Mitch storm in the Gulf would upwell cooler water and weaken, but I'd think a faster moving strong storm in the Gulf would be more affected by the heat content well above above the 26ºC isotherm, as it would be, to some degree, staying ahead of the maximum upwelling.
I think we generally agree high SSTs and heat content, all else equal, means stronger storms.
But what about frequency?
I used to see posts on the Wunderground threads like "wow, the Gulf is boiling, something has to pop soon".
1996 was a busy Gulf season, 1997, the El Nino year, had only Danny. Were SSTs that different? I don't know, actually.
Anyway, just wanted to get opinions from the folks, pros and amateurs alike, on my theory that heat content as currently defined is not as important as surface SST for fast moving systems, and whether frequency is a function of Gulf SSTs.
