Dirty side of a storm

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

Dirty side of a storm

#1 Postby GalvestonDuck » Sun Jul 20, 2003 8:59 am

Just WHY exactly does the dirty side of a storm become the dirty side? What causes the northeast quadrant to be the worst?

Thanks!
0 likes   

User avatar
Scott_inVA
Storm2k Forecaster
Storm2k Forecaster
Posts: 1238
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 5:44 pm
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Contact:

Re: Dirty side of a storm

#2 Postby Scott_inVA » Sun Jul 20, 2003 10:15 am

GalvestonDuck wrote:Just WHY exactly does the dirty side of a storm become the dirty side? What causes the northeast quadrant to be the worst?

Thanks!


Over simplified, the right side of a TC (in the N. Hem) typically produces the strongest winds due to the forward motion of the storm. If a storm is moving say due west (270°), the right side is actually to the NORTH (0°) of the track. A right side of a storm moving NW (315°) is really NE (45°).

Cyclones spin counter-clockwise, so a TC w/110MPH winds moving NW at 10 would produce ~120MPH winds in the right quads. Given the track of most TC's, the NE Quad therefore is where the strongest winds are located. The thing to remember is the NE Quad is 0° to 90° of the storm's path, not necessarily NE of what a satellite image displays. Heck, if Danny moves due south, the "northeast quad" of the storm is the SW quad of a sat image. :roll: Go figure.

Again, there is more to it, but that's the general idea.

HIH
Scott
WREL Radio,
Lexington, VA
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Actually

#3 Postby wxman57 » Sun Jul 20, 2003 10:24 am

Actualy, a 110 mph storm will have 110 mph as the max winds - regardless of how fast it is moving. Recon estimates already take forward motion into account, so you do not add the forward speed to the right front quadrant.
0 likes   

User avatar
Scott_inVA
Storm2k Forecaster
Storm2k Forecaster
Posts: 1238
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 5:44 pm
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Contact:

Re: Actually

#4 Postby Scott_inVA » Sun Jul 20, 2003 10:49 am

wxman57 wrote:Actualy, a 110 mph storm will have 110 mph as the max winds - regardless of how fast it is moving. Recon estimates already take forward motion into account, so you do not add the forward speed to the right front quadrant.


That is correct. One does not add forward speed to est winds. SFC Obs likewise reflect same.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Teban54, TomballEd and 50 guests