2008 Cyclones Retirement

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Derek Ortt

#21 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:39 pm

none of the Atlantic storms stand a greater than 1% chance of retirement
0 likes   

HurricaneRobert
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 812
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 9:31 pm

Re:

#22 Postby HurricaneRobert » Fri Jul 25, 2008 1:20 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:none of the Atlantic storms stand a greater than 1% chance of retirement


Didn't you say something similar about Dean and Noel? :wink: Anyway, the name Dolly replaced - Diana - was retired for much less. All this means is that if a country requests it, it will probably be removed from the list.
0 likes   

Cyclone1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2739
Age: 33
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Florida

#23 Postby Cyclone1 » Fri Jul 25, 2008 2:10 pm

I agree with Derek... chances of a retirement from the 3 we've seen so far are incredibly low.
0 likes   

Squarethecircle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2165
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Fairfax, VA

#24 Postby Squarethecircle » Fri Jul 25, 2008 2:14 pm

If the damage reports on Dolly are lower than 1 billion (which is pretty likely), then it really doesn't stand a chance at all (or rather, it does, because it'll come back in 2014).
0 likes   

Cleveland Kent Evans
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 235
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 4:02 pm

Re: Re:

#25 Postby Cleveland Kent Evans » Fri Jul 25, 2008 2:40 pm

HurricaneRobert wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:none of the Atlantic storms stand a greater than 1% chance of retirement


Didn't you say something similar about Dean and Noel? :wink: Anyway, the name Dolly replaced - Diana - was retired for much less. All this means is that if a country requests it, it will probably be removed from the list.


According to Wikipedia (not the world's best source, but probably generally reliable on something like this) Hurricane Diana was responsible for 139 deaths in Mexico with another 56 people missing. I'm sure that's why the Mexican government requested the name's retirement. I don't think casualty figures for Dolly are expected to be anywhere near that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Diana#Impact
0 likes   

HurricaneRobert
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 812
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 9:31 pm

Re: Re:

#26 Postby HurricaneRobert » Fri Jul 25, 2008 3:09 pm

Cleveland Kent Evans wrote:
HurricaneRobert wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:none of the Atlantic storms stand a greater than 1% chance of retirement


Didn't you say something similar about Dean and Noel? :wink: Anyway, the name Dolly replaced - Diana - was retired for much less. All this means is that if a country requests it, it will probably be removed from the list.


According to Wikipedia (not the world's best source, but probably generally reliable on something like this) Hurricane Diana was responsible for 139 deaths in Mexico with another 56 people missing. I'm sure that's why the Mexican government requested the name's retirement. I don't think casualty figures for Dolly are expected to be anywhere near that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Diana#Impact


I meant Dean and Noel for comparison because last season everyone was debating whether those two were worthy of retirement. Sorry that was worded badly. The point is not to put much focus to damage or casualty figures. Klaus is another example of a storm getting retired because a country requested it.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: Re:

#27 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jul 25, 2008 7:32 pm

HurricaneRobert wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:none of the Atlantic storms stand a greater than 1% chance of retirement


Didn't you say something similar about Dean and Noel? :wink: Anyway, the name Dolly replaced - Diana - was retired for much less. All this means is that if a country requests it, it will probably be removed from the list.



I said Dean would probably be retired by France (the only country with a legitimate argument... and it was retired by France)

Noel never should have been. I believe France also requested its retirement (and it did not do anything to France as a TC!)
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

Re: 2008 Cyclones Retirement

#28 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:27 pm

Remember Hati don't count

Fay 12%=not likely
Gustav 42%=leaning toward not being retired
Hanna don't really know yet, but going from current info about 8%. Will likely go up...

Watching IKE. Maybe that will top 50%????

Overall
Arthur 1%
Bertha 9%
Christobal 4%
Dolly 31%=not likely retired
Edouard 7% not going to happen
Fay 12%
Gustav 42%, leaning towards no.
Hanna a wait and see....
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

Re: 2008 Cyclones Retirement

#29 Postby HurricaneBill » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:35 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:Remember Haiti don't count


What do you mean Haiti doesn't count? I know it's rare for Haiti to request a name be retired, but Haiti has just as much say as any other country.

I think Haiti has requested a name be retired at least once. After the 1954 hurricane season, Haiti requested that the name Hazel not be used again.

I think Gustav's retirement is a sure bet. Either the U.S. or Cuba will probably make the request.
0 likes   

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6666
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: 2008 Cyclones Retirement

#30 Postby Cyclenall » Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:28 am

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:Remember Hati don't count

Fay 12%=not likely
Gustav 42%=leaning toward not being retired
Hanna don't really know yet, but going from current info about 8%. Will likely go up...

Watching IKE. Maybe that will top 50%????

Overall
Arthur 1%
Bertha 9%
Christobal 4%
Dolly 31%=not likely retired
Edouard 7% not going to happen
Fay 12%
Gustav 42%, leaning towards no.
Hanna a wait and see....

How can you lean towards no for Gustav? Cuba or the US will certainly retire him. I would put it at 97% for Gustav.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#31 Postby KWT » Thu Sep 04, 2008 7:01 am

Yeah Cuba will very likely request retirement of this system and also quite possibly the US even if the damage hasn't been as bad as expected...
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#32 Postby Chacor » Thu Sep 04, 2008 7:51 am

Cuba only suffered damage from Gustav and no deaths — any retirement request is unlikely to come from them. Jamaica might have a shout at asking for Gustav to be retired though.
0 likes   

HurricaneRobert
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 812
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 9:31 pm

Re: 2008 Cyclones Retirement

#33 Postby HurricaneRobert » Thu Sep 04, 2008 7:55 am

The estimate on Dolly is $1.5 billion. Billion dollar storms usually get their names taken off the list.

Fay's numbers could inflate real quickly if it hurt agriculture - especially citrus.

Cuba's government called Gustav the worst storm to hit in 50 years. Why would they not ask for retirement?
0 likes   

Cleveland Kent Evans
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 235
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 4:02 pm

Re: 2008 Cyclones Retirement

#34 Postby Cleveland Kent Evans » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:43 am

Everyone is just doing a lot of speculation here. (Not that that's bad. :) )

Just who is it in each country that decides whether or not a request for retirement should be made? Is there generally a committee that decides this? Or is it just one person? In the USA, where does the request come from? The National Hurricane Center? Who at the Center makes the decision? Is the decision completely subjective, or does any country have a set of objective criteria in terms of lives lost or property damage that makes a decision automatic one way or the other?
0 likes   

User avatar
Category 5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10074
Age: 35
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: New Brunswick, NJ
Contact:

Re: 2008 Cyclones Retirement

#35 Postby Category 5 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:08 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:Remember Hati don't count


I know you mean that in the "They never request it" category. At least I hope.

Gordon killed over 1000 there and it's still on the list, Gustav did significant damage in Cuba and the Isle of Youth but 0 deaths, aftermath in the U.S doesn't lead me to believe that we'd request it. Overall, I think we'll see Gustav in 2014.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#36 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:19 pm

My estimated probabilities per storm so far:

Arthur - 2%
Bertha - 2%
Cristobal - <2%
Dolly - 25%
Edouard - <2%
Fay - 20%
Gustav - 98%
Hanna - 40%
Ike - 90%, may change
Josephine - <2%
Last edited by CrazyC83 on Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: 2008 Cyclones Retirement

#37 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:22 pm

HurricaneRobert wrote:The estimate on Dolly is $1.5 billion. Billion dollar storms usually get their names taken off the list.

Fay's numbers could inflate real quickly if it hurt agriculture - especially citrus.

Cuba's government called Gustav the worst storm to hit in 50 years. Why would they not ask for retirement?


Those numbers for Dolly and Fay may be overestimates. I am guessing they will end up back around $500M to $800M for each storm, which in recent years has not been enough for the US to request retirement. No other country has a real case for retiring them either.
0 likes   

User avatar
Category 5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10074
Age: 35
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: New Brunswick, NJ
Contact:

Re: 2008 Cyclones Retirement

#38 Postby Category 5 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:51 pm

Be careful with these early damage estimates.

Katrina: 81.2 Billion (Early estimate 100-200 Billion)
Ophelia: 70 Million (Early estimate 1.6 Billion)
Humberto: 50 Million (Early estimate 1.5 Billion)

Bottom line, wait for the TCR.
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

Re: 2008 Cyclones Retirement

#39 Postby HurricaneBill » Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:52 pm

Category 5 wrote:I know you mean that in the "They never request it" category. At least I hope.

Gordon killed over 1000 there and it's still on the list, Gustav did significant damage in Cuba and the Isle of Youth but 0 deaths, aftermath in the U.S doesn't lead me to believe that we'd request it. Overall, I think we'll see Gustav in 2014.


Even though there were no deaths, Cuba might still request Gustav be retired. I read that Castro said the Isle of Youth looked like somebody dropped an atomic bomb on it.

As for Gordon, if I recall correctly, there was a big political crisis going on in Haiti in late 1994. Gordon probably slipped through the cracks.
0 likes   

HurricaneRobert
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 812
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 9:31 pm

Re: 2008 Cyclones Retirement

#40 Postby HurricaneRobert » Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:51 pm

From what I can tell, Haiti is still quite a lawless country. France may have requested Noel's retirement on their behalf.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BobHarlem, Google Adsense [Bot] and 41 guests