ATL HANNA: Extratropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re: Re:

#3681 Postby fasterdisaster » Wed Sep 03, 2008 11:08 pm

skufful wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
skufful wrote:
Jesus, lets quibble, one's definitely further south (or should I say, closer to my location). I think if you "smoothe" the lines, there is little argument.



There. I smoothed them out. Landfall location the same. 11pm track a little further north in the short term. Red line is 5pm, yellow line is 11pm.

Image


I have a Masters in Business from Wake Forest, but I don't how to, but if I did, I would borrow your crayon and smooth them myself. But as far as I am concerned, for me, my wife, three children, two houses, restaurant (emilysrestaurant.com), for some inane reason, I like the 8pm better.



What you're seeing is the fact that the track reflects the position 12 hours out, then 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 120. The position for 8 PM on Saturday is further south and east than 11 PM on Sunday.

Nice shameless plug BTW (jk) :wink:
0 likes   

skufful
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 244
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2003 6:37 pm
Location: Beaufort, SC

Re: Re:

#3682 Postby skufful » Wed Sep 03, 2008 11:17 pm

Jesus, lets quibble, one's definitely further south (or should I say, closer to my location). I think if you "smoothe" the lines, there is little argument.[/quote]


There. I smoothed them out. Landfall location the same. 11pm track a little further north in the short term. Red line is 5pm, yellow line is 11pm.

Image[/quote]

I have a Masters in Business from Wake Forest, but I don't how to, but if I did, I would borrow your crayon and smooth them myself. But as far as I am concerned, for me, my wife, three children, two houses, restaurant (emilysrestaurant.com), for some inane reason, I like the 8pm better.[/quote]


What you're seeing is the fact that the track reflects the position 12 hours out, then 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 120. The position for 8 PM on Saturday is further south and east than 11 PM on Sunday.

Nice shameless plug BTW (jk) :wink:[/quote]

But you do have to agree that cone does now include Ga, (Savannah - birthtown), while the 8pm didn't. Is that a result of smoothing? BTW sorry for the shamless plug, slipped out.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38090
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: ATL HANNA: Tropical Storm - Discussion

#3683 Postby Brent » Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:58 am

Not as impressive post-eclipse:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
WxGuy1
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 538
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: ATL HANNA: Tropical Storm - Discussion

#3684 Postby WxGuy1 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:31 am

Brent wrote:Not as impressive post-eclipse:


That's an understatement. It looks absolutely horrible. I still think there's a pretty good chance that Hanna will not do much better than TS-strength. I also have an inkling to say it'll do the "usual" -- recurve early enough to give a glancing blow to the Outer Banks and Cape Hatteras.
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: ATL HANNA: Tropical Storm - Discussion

#3685 Postby Thunder44 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:53 am

WxGuy1 wrote:
Brent wrote:Not as impressive post-eclipse:


That's an understatement. It looks absolutely horrible. I still think there's a pretty good chance that Hanna will not do much better than TS-strength. I also have an inkling to say it'll do the "usual" -- recurve early enough to give a glancing blow to the Outer Banks and Cape Hatteras.


I think it has a pretty good outflow on the northern quads. But it seems to be entraining some dry air and under some shear from the SW, which has caused the convention to diminish around the center.
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: ATL HANNA: Tropical Storm - Discussion

#3686 Postby Thunder44 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:55 am

Well NHC at 5am has increased her winds to near 70mph. But they are only calling for "slight" strengthening over the next couple days. I suspect she did a little more strenghtening after the last mission yesterday.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#3687 Postby KWT » Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:38 am

Yeah it doesn't look great compared with ole Ike out there!
I suppose its still a strong TS andd it still looks better wrapped up then it did 24hrs ago.
0 likes   

xironman
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2522
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: NoVA

Re: ATL HANNA: Tropical Storm - Discussion

#3688 Postby xironman » Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:44 am

How can something that looks like that actually be dropping in pressure from 990 -> 988. It just does not make sense.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#3689 Postby KWT » Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:48 am

Because whilst it does look poor its clearly got convection over the center and its actually pretty well wrapped if you loo, just needs deeper convection and it wouldn't look all that bad.
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5300
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

#3690 Postby Nimbus » Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:56 am

Once she gets out of the shear from the ULL to her SW she should recover later today.

If she were actually to stay weak and devoid of convection there would not be as much of a weakness left behind for Ike would there?
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#3691 Postby KWT » Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:02 am

Quite possibly not Numbus though I think the thing that keeps the weakness to some extent is the ET process aand when it develops frontal system it leaves a tail of energy to the south I'd guess.

Anyway just need to see if the convection decides to rebuild or not. At least its not a total mess like it was before.
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5300
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

#3692 Postby Nimbus » Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:09 am

One thing for sure, that naked LLC is not going to be much of a trough magnet unless she deepens pretty soon!
0 likes   

User avatar
jabber
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 688
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2003 5:36 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC (former Boynton Beach, Fl)

Re:

#3693 Postby jabber » Thu Sep 04, 2008 6:03 am

KWT wrote:Quite possibly not Numbus though I think the thing that keeps the weakness to some extent is the ET process aand when it develops frontal system it leaves a tail of energy to the south I'd guess.

Anyway just need to see if the convection decides to rebuild or not. At least its not a total mess like it was before.



Yeah maybe but right now if you look at the WV view of the atlantic its hard to even see a TS or even a TD by the look. I think if some convection does not start to wrap soon it will never make it to a Hurricane much less stay at a TS.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#3694 Postby KWT » Thu Sep 04, 2008 6:16 am

Actually I've just has another look at the Vis...it is a mess afterall! :P
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#3695 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Sep 04, 2008 6:20 am

Image

Just by looking at the image it's impossible to estimate 60 knots. Hanna must have a very vigorous LLC.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL HANNA: Tropical Storm - Discussion

#3696 Postby wxman57 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 6:22 am

WxGuy1 wrote:
Brent wrote:Not as impressive post-eclipse:


That's an understatement. It looks absolutely horrible. I still think there's a pretty good chance that Hanna will not do much better than TS-strength. I also have an inkling to say it'll do the "usual" -- recurve early enough to give a glancing blow to the Outer Banks and Cape Hatteras.


Hanna doesn't even look tropical. It has NO CORE! There are no high winds around the center evident on obs in the area. I haven't been able to find a TS wind observation, though it may have a few. Don't focus on where the center goes ashore as there isn't anything AT the center except a region of lighter winds. I doubt it'll recover before it passes the Carolinas tomorrow (o4 after). In that case, look for 35-45 mph winds with higher gusts as it goes by. Seems to be really accelerating now, too.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#3697 Postby KWT » Thu Sep 04, 2008 6:30 am

Also with such a weak system its more likely to steered by the lower steering current.
0 likes   

User avatar
Okibeach
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:12 pm
Location: Oak Island NC

Re: ATL HANNA: Tropical Storm - Discussion

#3698 Postby Okibeach » Thu Sep 04, 2008 6:54 am

I was shocked by the winds mentioned in the 5 a.m discussion. It looks so pathetic and hard to make out much circulation at all. Gustav looked better than this after being over land for a couple of days.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#3699 Postby KWT » Thu Sep 04, 2008 6:59 am

It can't be 70mph now, I'd be very surprised if it was anything above 40kts right now but then again it depends on how well the LLC is holding up.
0 likes   

Stormavoider
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 671
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Spring Hill Fl.

Re: ATL HANNA: Tropical Storm - Discussion

#3700 Postby Stormavoider » Thu Sep 04, 2008 7:02 am

Okibeach wrote: hard to make out much circulation at all.

Maybe this will help.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests