Got to give them credit
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
chadtm80
Got to give them credit
Got to give the NHC credit on this one.. claudette did all kinds of wiered things but they stayed confident the whole time... and they only ended up being off what?? 150 miles in 5 days... Great Job!!
0 likes
-
cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 145308
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Agree they did a great job considering the history of this system from the start and the track from them was on the mark although a little more north of what they haved projected but in general they nailed it.The intensity forecast was the most difficult part to forecast due to the ups and downs twists and turns that Claudette did from the start but they at the end nailed it too.
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
-
GulfBreezer
- Category 5
- Posts: 2230
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 8:58 pm
- Location: Gulf Breeze Fl
- Contact:
-
JetMaxx
Excellent job as usual. Look at the Hurricane warning area....from Baffin Bay to High Island -- and the hurricane is crossing the coast over Matagorda Bay...between Port O'Conner and Bay City...Claudette is "splitting the uprights"...right down the middle.
The problem is some folks (esp. at another "unnamed" storm forum) expect too much -- if the hurricane is forecast three days ahead of cross the coast at 27.5N ...they consider it a miss if it crosses the coast at 27.0N....or 28.0N.
Of course, these complainers and whiners that are bashing the NHC forecasters always seem to be folks NOT in the hurricane's path. If you live this morning in Bay City or Palacios, Texas....you are likely thanking God the National Hurricane Center is as accurate as they are.....and that you had advance warning to prepare; and in some cases....time to evacuate.
Just my .02 cents worth...
The problem is some folks (esp. at another "unnamed" storm forum) expect too much -- if the hurricane is forecast three days ahead of cross the coast at 27.5N ...they consider it a miss if it crosses the coast at 27.0N....or 28.0N.
Of course, these complainers and whiners that are bashing the NHC forecasters always seem to be folks NOT in the hurricane's path. If you live this morning in Bay City or Palacios, Texas....you are likely thanking God the National Hurricane Center is as accurate as they are.....and that you had advance warning to prepare; and in some cases....time to evacuate.
Just my .02 cents worth...
0 likes
-
ColdFront77
Yes indeed, The Natinal Hurricane Center did do a great job on the forecast track of Claudette.
It was true that, late yesterday afternoon the speed was under the average speed of 8 miles per hour, which would not of made landfall at 11:00 AM CT/Noon ET.
My calculations (as well as David/vbhoutex) really were true, I was honestly giving specifics on the current speed of the storm as of about eighteen hours ago. I hope everyone understands that.
It was true that, late yesterday afternoon the speed was under the average speed of 8 miles per hour, which would not of made landfall at 11:00 AM CT/Noon ET.
My calculations (as well as David/vbhoutex) really were true, I was honestly giving specifics on the current speed of the storm as of about eighteen hours ago. I hope everyone understands that.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], ouragans, USTropics, wwizard, wxman57, Yellow Evan and 47 guests