Recon flight aborted, emergency landing required.

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

Recon flight aborted, emergency landing required.

#1 Postby GalvestonDuck » Tue Jul 15, 2003 12:09 pm

Went home on my break (hey, I'm a mere block or so away) and tuned into the news. Channel 2's Stephen Dean reported from Biloxi. He was supposed to fly with hurricane hunters (correct me if I'm wrong calling it recon...he called them hurricane hunters...aren't they the same as the recon dudes or do a bunch of different mets and military guys fly into those things?). They left Biloxi for what was to be the last flight now that Claudette is overland. But during the flight, there was a problem with engine #3 and fuel began pouring out. They were close enough to get back to Biloxi and land safely. He said the fuel was just gushing out, long after landing.

I'm glad they were able to land safely and I really appreciate what they do for us.
0 likes   

User avatar
GulfBreezer
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2230
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 8:58 pm
Location: Gulf Breeze Fl
Contact:

#2 Postby GulfBreezer » Tue Jul 15, 2003 12:20 pm

WOW, that is scary isn't it?? I agree GD, that is a scary job to begin with and they provide us with so much valuable info!! Hats off to all to all of those guys!!
0 likes   

JetMaxx

#3 Postby JetMaxx » Tue Jul 15, 2003 12:30 pm

They are extremely fortunate it occurred in the Biloxi area in good weather....and not in the eyewall of Claudette -- which would have been catastrophic.

We've been extremely lucky...the last weather reconnisance crew lost in an Atlantic hurricane was a US Navy Neptune that went down in ferocious hurricane Janet in the Caribbean in September 1955; but there have been some very close calls since then (i.e. - hurricane Camille 1969; hurricane Edith 1971; hurricane Hugo 1989).

We've come to think flying into hurricanes....even powerful cat-5 hurricanes as routine, but it's anything but.....it's frightening and dangerous work, especially penetrating small compact and intense hurricanes such as Andrew and Camille.

PW
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve Cosby
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 525
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 6:49 pm
Location: Northwest Arkansas

Small and compact like Andrew are preferred...

#4 Postby Steve Cosby » Tue Jul 15, 2003 12:46 pm

I was watching something last night and one of the HH pilots said that he actually preferred flying Cat 4 and above cyclones because the wind, although at 185 mph, is less turbulent than in the small less defined cyclones like Claudette. I believe I remember him saying that they get bumped around more in these than in the Cat 4's.

Interesting take from the pilot.
0 likes   

User avatar
bfez1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6548
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:14 am
Location: Meraux--10 mi E of New Orleans-totally destroyed by Katrina
Contact:

#5 Postby bfez1 » Tue Jul 15, 2003 12:47 pm

Hats off to all "hurricane hunters". They are some very brave souls.
0 likes   

JetMaxx

#6 Postby JetMaxx » Tue Jul 15, 2003 1:07 pm

It depends Steve....a large cat-5 like Gilbert at 10,000 might not be as bad as a small cat-2; but a small intense cat-4 or 5 is hell on earth.

Those three close calls I mentioned occurred in small violent hurricanes.
Hugo became a large hurricane before impacting South Carolina....but when the incident occurred that almost brought a P-3 out of the sky was when Hugo was a small cat-5 well east of Guadeloupe. At the time, winds were 160 mph (918 mb), with hurricane force winds only extending 30 miles from the center...

In 1971, Edith was a very small cat-4 (943 mb/ 140-145 mph); and we all know Camille was a compact cat-5.

I once had the pleasure of meeting USAFR Lt Gale Carter who flew into hurricane Andrew in 1992 as it approached southeast Florida. He said it was the roughest ride into a hurricane he ever experienced....felt as if the plane were coming apart in mid-air.

In a small intense hurricane, the pressure gradient is tighter....much tougher to penetrate than a large, sprawling intense hurricane such as Gilbert or Floyd.

PW
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve Cosby
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 525
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 6:49 pm
Location: Northwest Arkansas

I did have to wonder....

#7 Postby Steve Cosby » Tue Jul 15, 2003 9:32 pm

I did wonder if there was maybe more in his statement that wasn't played back on TV last night. It makes sense, at least somewhat, that turbulence could be less with higher wind speeds.

That's right: hats off to these guys. I hope they are decorated properly after their tours.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: afswo, chaser1, Kohlecane, Teban54 and 42 guests