URNT12 KNHC 131159
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE
A. 13/1147Z
B. 25 DEG 20 MIN N
91 DEG 55 MIN W
C. 850 MB 1426 M
D. 50 KT
E. 348 DEG 032 NM
F. 142 DEG 56 KT
G. 348 DEG 032 NM
H. EXTRAP 999 MB
I. 17 C/ 1533 M
J. 21 C/ 1524 M
K. 15 C/ NA
L. NA
M. NA
N. 12345/8
O. 0.1/2 NM
P. AF967 1504A CLAUDETTE OB 04
MAX FL WIND 56 KT NE QUAD 1117Z. SLP EXTRAP FROM 850MB.
Pressure down to 996
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- Toni - 574
- Category 1
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 9:20 pm
- Location: W. Central Florida
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22978
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Up, Down, Up, Down
Yeah, right after she looked down and out at 4am, Claudete began reorganizing. The center looks like it is reforming closer to the convection. I am concerned that the wind shear is forecast (by the GFS) to drop off today. Hopefully that big mass of dry air flowing south of out Texas will cap the convection soon.
Here's the latest high-res visible image with surface plots:
http://home.houston.rr.com/wx/claudette23.gif
Here's the latest high-res visible image with surface plots:
http://home.houston.rr.com/wx/claudette23.gif
0 likes
- Stormsfury
- Category 5
- Posts: 10549
- Age: 53
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
- Location: Summerville, SC
Surprise ... look at the outflow pattern ... almost a V-shaped divergence pattern (something seen in strong MCS in the US) and now the Southerly shear is lessening but becoming westerly... though, there's still some westerly shear ...
Furthermore, the center is not as exposed and showing some signs of tucking in more underneath the convection ... but going against Claudette ... the anticyclonic circulation is south of the massive convection of Cluadette seen on the IR channel
Visible
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
Infrared
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
Furthermore, the center is not as exposed and showing some signs of tucking in more underneath the convection ... but going against Claudette ... the anticyclonic circulation is south of the massive convection of Cluadette seen on the IR channel
Visible
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
Infrared
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
0 likes
It's 996 now...
000
URNT12 KNHC 131327
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE
A. 13/1327Z
B. 25 DEG 27 MIN N
92 DEG 03 MIN W
C. 850 MB 1402 M
D. 55 KT
E. 317 DEG 025 NM
F. 057 DEG 58 KT
G. 313 DEG 017 NM
H. EXTRAP 996 MB
I. 17 C/ 1544 M
J. 21 C/ 1536 M
K. 16 C/ NA
L. NA
M. NA
N. 12345/08
O. 0.1/1 NM
P. AF967 1504A CLAUDETTE OB 09
MAX FL WIND 58 KT NW QUAD 1322Z. SLP EXTRAP FROM 850MB.
000
URNT12 KNHC 131327
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE
A. 13/1327Z
B. 25 DEG 27 MIN N
92 DEG 03 MIN W
C. 850 MB 1402 M
D. 55 KT
E. 317 DEG 025 NM
F. 057 DEG 58 KT
G. 313 DEG 017 NM
H. EXTRAP 996 MB
I. 17 C/ 1544 M
J. 21 C/ 1536 M
K. 16 C/ NA
L. NA
M. NA
N. 12345/08
O. 0.1/1 NM
P. AF967 1504A CLAUDETTE OB 09
MAX FL WIND 58 KT NW QUAD 1322Z. SLP EXTRAP FROM 850MB.
0 likes
- wx247
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 14279
- Age: 41
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
- Location: Monett, Missouri
- Contact:
Wow. Looking at the vis. imagery this morning and it looks better. The center is very well defined and is much closer to the convection. Wonder what the new advisory will say?
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: cajungal, cycloneye, HurricaneBelle, KeysRedWine and 58 guests