


Moderator: S2k Moderators
bvigal wrote:Anyone seen
ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR
DISTURBANCE INVEST (AL922008) 20080813 0000 UTC
for 6z?
bvigal wrote:Anyone seen
ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR
DISTURBANCE INVEST (AL922008) 20080813 0000 UTC
for 6z?
Code: Select all
AL, 92, 2008081000, , BEST, 0, 105N, 397W, 25, 1009, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0,
AL, 92, 2008081006, , BEST, 0, 105N, 413W, 25, 1009, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0,
AL, 92, 2008081012, , BEST, 0, 105N, 429W, 25, 1009, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, 1011, 150, 0, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, M,
AL, 92, 2008081018, , BEST, 0, 107N, 445W, 25, 1009, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, 1011, 150, 40, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, M,
AL, 92, 2008081100, , BEST, 0, 110N, 457W, 25, 1009, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, 1012, 150, 40, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, M,
AL, 92, 2008081106, , BEST, 0, 111N, 468W, 25, 1009, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, 1012, 150, 40, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, S,
AL, 92, 2008081112, , BEST, 0, 119N, 473W, 20, 1009, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, 1011, 150, 40, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, S,
AL, 92, 2008081118, , BEST, 0, 127N, 477W, 25, 1008, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, 1011, 180, 60, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, M,
AL, 92, 2008081200, , BEST, 0, 138N, 485W, 25, 1008, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, 1011, 180, 60, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, M,
AL, 92, 2008081206, , BEST, 0, 148N, 498W, 25, 1008, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, 1011, 180, 60, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, S,
AL, 92, 2008081212, , BEST, 0, 156N, 510W, 25, 1007, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, 1011, 180, 60, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, M,
AL, 92, 2008081218, , BEST, 0, 164N, 522W, 25, 1009, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, 1011, 200, 60, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, M,
AL, 92, 2008081300, , BEST, 0, 170N, 532W, 25, 1009, DB, 34, NEQ, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1011, 200, 60, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, M,
bvigal wrote:AL, 92, 2008081300, , BEST, 0, 170N, 532W, 25, 1009, DB, 34, NEQ
Last thing I find posted on 92. Anyone know what the bold part means?
HURAKAN wrote:bvigal wrote:Anyone seen
ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR
DISTURBANCE INVEST (AL922008) 20080813 0000 UTC
for 6z?
Only Kika's is out. Kika is still being tracked as a disturbance.
Recurve wrote:I am kind of amazed and concerned about these models still showing development into a hurricane approaching south florida. It seems fairly consistent across the GFDL, NAM, Euro. I note Derek's statement previous that the Euro shouldn't be used for forecasting genesis.
We'll be watching this until it totally evaporates or goes ashore. As many have said, a wave in the Bahamas is still a threat for the EC.
Anyone have any insight on why the models have been insisting on development into a significant storm?
Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:Recurve wrote:I am kind of amazed and concerned about these models still showing development into a hurricane approaching south florida. It seems fairly consistent across the GFDL, NAM, Euro. I note Derek's statement previous that the Euro shouldn't be used for forecasting genesis.
We'll be watching this until it totally evaporates or goes ashore. As many have said, a wave in the Bahamas is still a threat for the EC.
Anyone have any insight on why the models have been insisting on development into a significant storm?
In a few days when it is several hundred miles west the upper air conditions become more
favorable to allow rapid intensification. Right now some dry air or lack of convergence
is inhibiting it, but once it gets further west north of Puerto Rico or west of there
it will have explosive oceanic heat content and a much more favorable
upper level environment to allow it to deepen according to the models.
The ECMWF brings it through Key West/South Florida and then along
the west coast to Tampa Bay and then northward, which would be a scary
scenario for both of us and for the FL peninsula. That is why I am watching
this very closely. Also, convection is increasing around the center
this morning, confirming my thinking on slow development. This could
be stronger than a 30 mph wave when it approaches FL...
littlevince wrote:GFS vs. ECM vs. GFDL 00z runs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests