ATL: Tropical Depression Fay

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
caribepr
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 10:43 pm
Location: Culebra, PR 18.33 65.33

#341 Postby caribepr » Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:27 pm

Do we have a glossary around here? I could sure use one! Derek, you mentioned a couple of terms that are misused; capping was one of them. What exactly IS capping in regard to weather/storm? Not even sure how to ask! I never heard of it until today, in terms of storms anyway.
0 likes   

Mecklenburg

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Central Atlantic

#342 Postby Mecklenburg » Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:28 pm

now the convection is getting sparse...
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Central Atlantic

#343 Postby Stratosphere747 » Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:30 pm

Dry air is having some limited impact on the system.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#344 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:31 pm

Karen did strengthen upto a minimal hurricane...so not fair to say it didn't strengthen beforehand because it clearly did...

Anyway convection still doesn't look great but the structure still isn't all that bad, needs some convergence though because thats whats really hindering it a little now just like pre-Dolly.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Central Atlantic

#345 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:31 pm

Little dry air to the North and West.

Image

Shear doesn't look that bad, it seems to be getting nice outflow, and it looked 'good', if a tad disorganized, on visible.


Despite partial poofation, I'd say odds in excess of 50/50 it becomes a TD in the next day or two, unofficially.


I said that 3 times in 4 days for 94L/Dolly, before getting it right finally, for a batting average of .250, so 50/50 really means a 12.5% chance of development. Maybe.
0 likes   

Scorpion

#346 Postby Scorpion » Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:33 pm

I'm going to say the GFS is current and not really doing anything with this system. The next wave is the big one.
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3999
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

Re:

#347 Postby AJC3 » Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:37 pm

caribepr wrote:Do we have a glossary around here? I could sure use one! Derek, you mentioned a couple of terms that are misused; capping was one of them. What exactly IS capping in regard to weather/storm? Not even sure how to ask! I never heard of it until today, in terms of storms anyway.


A 'cap' is a thermal warm layer, usually in the mid levels, that inhibits convective updrafts.
0 likes   

Honeyko

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Central Atlantic

#348 Postby Honeyko » Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:39 pm

Stratosphere747 wrote:Dry air is having some limited impact on the system.

Image
The orange and red areas you're seeing are subsiding air. Note the strongest subsidence is right in front of 92L, not over toward Africa (where the SAL should presumably be driest).

Subsidence = adiabatic warming = capping layer. Less lift, less condensation, less clouds, certain light wavelengths bounce or radiate from the ocean surface straight to the satellite without hitting a thing.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7182
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re:

#349 Postby jlauderdal » Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:39 pm

caribepr wrote:Do we have a glossary around here? I could sure use one! Derek, you mentioned a couple of terms that are misused; capping was one of them. What exactly IS capping in regard to weather/storm? Not even sure how to ask! I never heard of it until today, in terms of storms anyway.


google.com is an excellent way to find more about weather terms than you could possibly digest in a lifetime, happy googling
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#350 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:41 pm

Derek has already said the main problem is the lack of covergence not the 'capping', its exactly the same with what happened with pre-Dolly as well.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#351 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:48 pm

Image

Image
0 likes   

Honeyko

Re:

#352 Postby Honeyko » Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:49 pm

KWT wrote:Derek has already said the main problem is the lack of covergence not the 'capping', its exactly the same with what happened with pre-Dolly as well.
They're interrelated: It's tough to maintain convergence while sliding into a region of subsidence.
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Central Atlantic

#353 Postby tolakram » Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:50 pm

Looks horrible, someone hit the off switch. Looks like my ability to destroy storms by predicting development is still working. :) Hopefully this one fades away, I don't like the location.

Image
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#354 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:52 pm

dry air is not a problem of this system. Dry air can be around a system, but you need shear to get it in. See ch 3 of my thesis
0 likes   

User avatar
alan1961
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Derby, Derbyshire, England
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Central Atlantic

#355 Postby alan1961 » Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:54 pm

vacanechaser wrote:
cheezyWXguy wrote:Well the circulation appears much less elongated and appears to have tightened up a bit. Although, this is one MASSIVE system. Convection appears to be increasing and development chances on the ssd tropical cyclone development probability page have skyrocketed.



i would not say massive... its a relativly small system.. thats why i think the gfs is having trouble hanging on to it right now... just a thought


Jesse V. Bass III
http://www.vastormphoto.com
Hurricane Intercept Research Team


Sorry about the late post..got a bit behind with the thread..i agree with you there vanechaser, while the GFS only has this as a minimal storm, TC or whatever, the biggie is behind it and winds it up to be serious business for the islands by next weekend, still they have been wrong before, so we'll concentrate on this one in hand first.


*edited by sg to take alan1961's post out of the quote box
0 likes   

User avatar
canetracker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 751
Age: 62
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:49 pm
Location: Suburbia New Orleans...Harahan, LA

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Central Atlantic

#356 Postby canetracker » Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:55 pm

Image
Lack of convergence is evident. However, environmental situations do change over time. Maybe the GFS is on to someting, but only time will tell.
0 likes   

Honeyko

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Central Atlantic

#357 Postby Honeyko » Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:58 pm

tolakram wrote:Looks horrible, someone hit the off switch. Looks like my ability to destroy storms by predicting development is still working. :)
I predicted (perhaps over-confidently) that it would die over in the forecast challenge; we'll see who the Fates decide to make a donkey of this time. :ggreen: (We need Einstein and Hee-Haw jackass smilies.)
Hopefully this one fades away, I don't like the location.
Yeah; it's pretty much a cardinal rule that the prettier they look in the Caribbean, the more stuff they're going to wreck.
0 likes   

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4230
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Central Atlantic

#358 Postby abajan » Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:59 pm

tolakram wrote:Looks horrible, someone hit the off switch. Looks like my ability to destroy storms by predicting development is still working. ..
Quite to the contrary, it looks quite healthy to me. I think convection will re-fire tonight and we'll have a TD by sometime tomorrow.
0 likes   

User avatar
caribepr
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 10:43 pm
Location: Culebra, PR 18.33 65.33

Re: Re:

#359 Postby caribepr » Sun Aug 10, 2008 6:07 pm

jlauderdal wrote:
caribepr wrote:Do we have a glossary around here? I could sure use one! Derek, you mentioned a couple of terms that are misused; capping was one of them. What exactly IS capping in regard to weather/storm? Not even sure how to ask! I never heard of it until today, in terms of storms anyway.


google.com is an excellent way to find more about weather terms than you could possibly digest in a lifetime, happy googling


ay yi yi...I spend my life googling and researching! I was wanting to cheat just for now (I'm whipped, getting ready to leave and securing my world) and thankfully, AJC3 let me do just that. Thanks for the capping answer, AJ!
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re:

#360 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Sun Aug 10, 2008 6:08 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:dry air is not a problem of this system. Dry air can be around a system, but you need shear to get it in. See ch 3 of my thesis



Posted online?
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests