ATL: Tropical Depression Fay

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Mecklenburg

Re:

#301 Postby Mecklenburg » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:28 pm

Stratosphere747 wrote:92l is really not that much more organized than when it was declared an invest early this morning.

It's the typical slow process with a disorganized system.


i remembered that when it was declared an invest yesterday...the wave on 30W is much more impressive than this one...
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re:

#302 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:29 pm

KWT wrote:to be honest Hurakan I do think that looks better at least in terms of the curvature it has and also to some extent the convective coverage as well.


A picture is worth a thousand words! I didn't say anything and everyone got my point!
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re:

#303 Postby ConvergenceZone » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:29 pm

KWT wrote:to be honest Hurakan I do think that looks better at least in terms of the curvature it has and also to some extent the convective coverage as well.


I agree, while some of the intensity in the convection has waned a bit, the expanse of the convection has improved as well as the curvature of it....
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

Re: Re:

#304 Postby Stratosphere747 » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:30 pm

HURAKAN wrote:
KWT wrote:to be honest Hurakan I do think that looks better at least in terms of the curvature it has and also to some extent the convective coverage as well.


A picture is worth a thousand words! I didn't say anything and everyone got my point!


And yet the bickering has been about where any llc is....

Carry on.
0 likes   

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

Re: Re:

#305 Postby 'CaneFreak » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:33 pm

Stratosphere747 wrote:
HURAKAN wrote:
KWT wrote:to be honest Hurakan I do think that looks better at least in terms of the curvature it has and also to some extent the convective coverage as well.


A picture is worth a thousand words! I didn't say anything and everyone got my point!


And yet the bickering has been about where any llc is....

Carry on.


LLC? The LLC is to the east of the convection. We cleared that up hours ago. Thanks for rehashing a dead point.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#306 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:33 pm

Loop: http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-ir2.html

It's becoming better organized. Slowly but steadily. Dolly and Humberto are proves that poof shouldn't be called lightly.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#307 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:34 pm

Well as several of the pro mets have said if you have them not agreeing on the rough location of any LLC then clearly the system must have a very weak LLC if its there.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Central Atlantic

#308 Postby wxman57 » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:35 pm

Was away for a few hours and sat down for a look at 92L. My impression is that convection has diminished in the last 3-4 hours, and that weakening trend continues presently. Doesn't look close to a TD. Maybe tomorrow, maybe never. Needs to develop persistent deep convection first.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#309 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:37 pm

wxman57, but that's normal in DMIN, especially for a developing disturbace.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Central Atlantic

#310 Postby cheezyWXguy » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:37 pm

wxman57 wrote:Was away for a few hours and sat down for a look at 92L. My impression is that convection has diminished in the last 3-4 hours, and that weakening trend continues presently. Doesn't look close to a TD. Maybe tomorrow, maybe never. Needs to develop persistent deep convection first.

Yup. of course convection was never over the center or very organized. I think we should just wait for dmax
0 likes   

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4230
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re:

#311 Postby abajan » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:37 pm

HURAKAN wrote:Image
HURAKAN, should this picture be viewed with 3D glasses?
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#312 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:39 pm

Yep in terms of convection it is weakening but as others have said it is Dmin so I'd sort of expect it at this stage in a systems development, its not at TD yet I agree.
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Central Atlantic

#313 Postby Stratosphere747 » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:40 pm

wxman57 wrote:Was away for a few hours and sat down for a look at 92L. My impression is that convection has diminished in the last 3-4 hours, and that weakening trend continues presently. Doesn't look close to a TD. Maybe tomorrow, maybe never. Needs to develop persistent deep convection first.


I promise that no money was passed 57's way...;)
0 likes   

User avatar
canetracker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 751
Age: 62
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:49 pm
Location: Suburbia New Orleans...Harahan, LA

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Central Atlantic

#314 Postby canetracker » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:40 pm

Image
Interesting latest image on RGB loop
0 likes   

Honeyko

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Central Atlantic

#315 Postby Honeyko » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:40 pm

http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/goeseastnheir.html

No centralized cold tops at present.

I agree, while some of the intensity in the convection has waned a bit, the expanse of the convection has improved as well as the curvature of it....
While that's a good note in favor, it's not always determinant. There have been times when the cap is so strong that it'll choke a TS as they near the LAs:

Image

....and sometimes even hurricanes:

Image

(And Karen had one of the biggest circulation envelopes I've ever seen. She would've been a monster major 'cane if she'd toughed it out.)

We know the cap was strong enough to crush invests as recently as last week (although 99L was farther north under stronger sinking than 92 is now).
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#316 Postby wxman57 » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:40 pm

HURAKAN wrote:wxman57, but that's normal in DMIN, especially for a developing disturbacne.


I was just making an observation. There was talk of convection increasing and/or wrapping around. I don't see any increase in convection - just the opposite.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Central Atlantic

#317 Postby x-y-no » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:41 pm

wxman57 wrote:Was away for a few hours and sat down for a look at 92L. My impression is that convection has diminished in the last 3-4 hours, and that weakening trend continues presently. Doesn't look close to a TD. Maybe tomorrow, maybe never. Needs to develop persistent deep convection first.


Certainly not close to a TD now, I agree. Tomorrow morning, maybe. Things look decently set up for some overnight development in my humble opinion.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#318 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:42 pm

Honeyko, Karen got hit by shear, that was nothing at all to do with so called capping, I believe Earl was the same as well.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Central Atlantic

#319 Postby Blown Away » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:43 pm

I feel 92L will be a depression soon and the TAFB map gives us an idea where the NHC will place 92L in 72 hours. Notice they have future 93L as a low to.
[img]Image[/img]
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#320 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:44 pm

the SAL and capping are two words that are being used in an incorrect manner quite frequently
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests