ATL: Tropical Depression Edouard

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#381 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:33 am

Well the strength issue really does depend on how far offshore it gets before coming back towards land again, if it can't get far enough then indeed this probably will max out like an Erin but you just can't say for certain just yet.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: Invest 91L - Gulf of Mexico

#382 Postby wxman57 » Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:37 am

Ed Mahmoud wrote:Wind shift off Dauphin Island - due to thunderstorm outflow, or an improving 91L?

¿ Quien Sabes ?

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/plot_met.php?s ... _label=CDT


See my surface plot a few posts back. The weak surface trof axis just passed by 42040. Winds west of the trof axis are out of the west. East of the axis they're out of the south.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

Re: ATL: Invest 91L - Gulf of Mexico

#383 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:44 am

I agree with wxman57. There is no convection over the trough its self, so no development within the next 12-24 hours. You can post pictures of crows after each of my forecast for the rest of the month if the recon finds a depression. Because I sure as heck don't think this will be one today. Take that to the bank that this will not be a depression before 8pm est.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145308
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: Invest 91L - Gulf of Mexico

#384 Postby cycloneye » Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:44 am

03/1145 UTC 28.2N 86.4W T1.5/1.5 91L -- Atlantic Ocean

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/positions.html
0 likes   

User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 58
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: ATL: Invest 91L - Gulf of Mexico

#385 Postby lrak » Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:46 am

thats a lot futher west than I expected :uarrow:
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#386 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:47 am

Well if recon does go in and finds a closed circulation with those T numbers it would get upgraded. However right now I also agree that there probably isn't a low level circulation.
0 likes   

User avatar
KatDaddy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2815
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 6:23 pm
Location: League City, Texas

#387 Postby KatDaddy » Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:50 am

0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145308
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: Invest 91L - Gulf of Mexico

#388 Postby cycloneye » Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:51 am

The 12:00 UTC ATCF best track:


AL, 91, 2008080312, , BEST, 0, 284N, 870W, 25, 1010, DB, 34, NEQ, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1013, 150, 30, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, M,

ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/atcf/tcweb/
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: Invest 91L - Gulf of Mexico

#389 Postby wxman57 » Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:51 am

cycloneye wrote: 03/1145 UTC 28.2N 86.4W T1.5/1.5 91L -- Atlantic Ocean

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/positions.html


There's nothing anywhere near that lat/lon. Pressures are lower 150nm to the west. Just straight south winds east of the trof axis there. I'd look farther west for any possible development. Those T numbers are pretty meaningless as there's no surface circulation.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#390 Postby Chacor » Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:54 am

SUBJ/TROPICAL CYCLONE FORMATION ALERT 030530Z AUG 08//
WTNT01 KNGU 030600
UNCLAS //N03146//
MSGID/GENADMIN/NAVMARFCSTCEN NORFOLK VA//
RMKS/1. FORMATION OF A TROPICAL CYCLONE IS POSSIBLE WITHIN 100 NM
EITHER SIDE OF A LINE FROM 29.4N 87.0W TO 27.7N 89.6W DURING THE
NEXT 24 TO 36 HOURS. AVAILABLE DATA DOES NOT JUSTIFY ISSUANCE OF
A NUMBERED TROPICAL CYCLONE WARNING AT THIS TIME.
2. AN AREA OF LOW PRESSURE WITH A CENTRAL PRESSURE OF 1009MB IS
LOCATED SOUTH OF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA. LITTLE MOTION IS
ANTICIPATED DURING THE NEXT 36 HOURS. BUOY OBSERVATIONS IN THE
REGION SHOW 15 TO 20 KT SURFACE WINDS WITH SURFACE PRESSURES
SLOWLY FALLING. CONDITIONS APPEAR TO BE FAVORABLE FOR
DEVELOPMENT AS THIS SYSTEM WILL REMAIN OVER VERY WARM SEA
SURFACE TEMPERATURES (84F - 86F) AND UPPER ATMOSPHERIC
CONDITIONS ARE BECOMING MORE CONDUCIVE FOR TROPICAL CYCLONE
DEVELOPMENT.
3. THIS ALERT WILL BE REISSUED, ALLOWED TO EXPIRE, OR CANCELLED
BY 040600Z AUG 08.//

http://www.nlmoc.navy.mil/cgi-bin/viewt ... cal/wtnt01
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#391 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:02 am

I think they fixed the MLC and not the LLC for the Dvorak estimate
0 likes   

hwego7

Re: ATL: Invest 91L - Gulf of Mexico

#392 Postby hwego7 » Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:07 am

Category 5 wrote:TCHP is not on its side.

Yes it is...right now we don't even have a tropical depression. Dolly underwent rapid intensification to major hurricane status over less TCHP. Felix strengthened into a category 5 hurricane over TCHP of less than 20. There is a bad misconception out there about TCHP and I'm not sure where it came from, but it's not true.

Image

The pic above is what Felix crossed over as it strengthened into a category 5 hurricane prior to landfall. TCHP is very favorable in the GOM and will support a catastrophic hurricane.
0 likes   

User avatar
KatDaddy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2815
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 6:23 pm
Location: League City, Texas

Re: ATL: Invest 91L - Gulf of Mexico

#393 Postby KatDaddy » Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:08 am

Here is a surface plot from Oceanweather.com

Image
0 likes   

hwego7

Re: ATL: Invest 91L - Gulf of Mexico

#394 Postby hwego7 » Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:13 am

wxman57 wrote:I think it has a good chance of spinning up a weak surface low before it moves inland into the upper TX coast or SW Louisiana in about 36 hours
None of the computer models are forecasting this to reach land sooner than 48 hours and the GFDL is at 54 hours. It is moving at 3kts at the moment and even drifting to the west or west-southwest. What do you see that will cause this to speed up drastically enough to make landfall in 36 hours?
Last edited by hwego7 on Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: Invest 91L - Gulf of Mexico

#395 Postby wxman57 » Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:19 am

hwego7 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:I think it has a good chance of spinning up a weak surface low before it moves inland into the upper TX coast or SW Louisiana in about 36 hours
None of the computer models is forecasting this to reach land sooner than 48 hours and the GFDL is at 54 hours. It is moving at less than 10mph at the moment and even drifting to the west or west-southwest. What do you see that will cause this to speed up drastically enough to make landfall in 36 hours?


Yeah, it'll probably be Tuesday morning before it moves inland. New runs are slower.
0 likes   

User avatar
dixiebreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5140
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: crystal river, fla.

Re: ATL: Invest 91L - Gulf of Mexico

#396 Postby dixiebreeze » Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:21 am

http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tc_pages/

The NRL track does not seem to show a west movement.
0 likes   

lonelymike
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 634
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:12 am
Location: walton county fla

#397 Postby lonelymike » Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:24 am

Wonder if this little system will spike oil prices. Won't this move thru an area of gulf oil and gas rigs?
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#398 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:24 am

Yep this should have a good 48hrs over waters, its enough time to develop a core and then strengthen into a decent TS still IMO esp if it does develop quickly. Also the TCFA does suggest a SW motion at a fairly slow rate.

Looks like the estimate of 27W is close but of course without a decent LLC its hard to say exactly where about it is.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#399 Postby wxman57 » Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:30 am

lonelymike wrote:Wonder if this little system will spike oil prices. Won't this move thru an area of gulf oil and gas rigs?


That won't matter. Oil companies aren't going to be evacuating the rigs. It'll just be an inconvenience for the guys working offshore.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: Invest 91L - Gulf of Mexico

#400 Postby ROCK » Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:30 am

28N 87W is were I suspect a broad LLC is trying to form just by looking at am vis loop.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/loop-vis.html
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests