RL3AO wrote:GeneratorPower wrote:We should see something from NHC, either a STDS if no upgrade or advisories at 5pm if so.
I think they will just wait until the TWO. Thats what they've done the past few days.
What's the TWO?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
RL3AO wrote:GeneratorPower wrote:We should see something from NHC, either a STDS if no upgrade or advisories at 5pm if so.
I think they will just wait until the TWO. Thats what they've done the past few days.
SkyDragon wrote:RL3AO wrote:GeneratorPower wrote:We should see something from NHC, either a STDS if no upgrade or advisories at 5pm if so.
I think they will just wait until the TWO. Thats what they've done the past few days.
What's the TWO?
SkyDragon wrote:RL3AO wrote:GeneratorPower wrote:We should see something from NHC, either a STDS if no upgrade or advisories at 5pm if so.
I think they will just wait until the TWO. Thats what they've done the past few days.
What's the TWO?
Brent wrote:RL3AO wrote:Where did this TS04 come from because it certainly wasn't the NHC.
Recurve wrote:Ed Mahmoud wrote:I said "TD today" based on morning satellite appearance three times in four days, and was wrong every time.
I just stared again intently at the satellite loop. It looks a little healthier, but no sign of a closed circulation. So maybe tomorrow, but recon won't find a closed circulation today, IMHO.
Ed you get a star for following up.
A lot of people are getting smarter about conditions and obs being right for development, not just looking at the rainbow loop and seeing TCs spinning every time there's a wave.
I think last year destroyed a lot of people.
KWT wrote:Yeah I wonder whether the software Scott assumes 35kts means TS?
KWT wrote:Hard to say Funster, depends partly on where about the center actually decides to form as well various other factors such as whether the high is as strong as progged further north etc...
I do note even a WNW path right now would probably make it a possible S.Texas threat.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests