ATL: Tropical Storm Cristobal in North Atlantic

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
funster
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 816
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:27 pm
Location: North Dallas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L off Southeast U.S

#241 Postby funster » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:15 pm

senorpepr wrote:
curtadams wrote:Closed circulation with heavy convection near the center on Jacksonville radar. Looks like a TD to me now. In what way isn't it a TD?


Yes, it as a defined circulation, but organized convection over the center is not happening. The only place significant convection is occurring is on the eastern and southeastern sections of the circulation. It's not quite enough to be classified as a depression.


You don't need convection all the way around to be named. You just a center and strong enough winds in one quadrant.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L off Southeast U.S

#242 Postby senorpepr » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:19 pm

txwatcher91 wrote:
senorpepr wrote:
curtadams wrote:Closed circulation with heavy convection near the center on Jacksonville radar. Looks like a TD to me now. In what way isn't it a TD?


Yes, it as a defined circulation, but organized convection over the center is not happening. The only place significant convection is occurring is on the eastern and southeastern sections of the circulation. It's not quite enough to be classified as a depression.


But visible and IR shows the circulation covered, and there have been many TD's with exposed LLC's which this one doesn't have.


Well, looking at the VIS and IR imagery off of NRL and meshing that with surface and buoy observations, and the LLC is not quite covered at all.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re:

#243 Postby senorpepr » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:20 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:IMO, they should have sent the NOAA plane out there today...


You can't schedule a mission that quickly.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38088
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L off Southeast U.S

#244 Postby Brent » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:20 pm

txwatcher91 wrote:
senorpepr wrote:
curtadams wrote:Closed circulation with heavy convection near the center on Jacksonville radar. Looks like a TD to me now. In what way isn't it a TD?


Yes, it as a defined circulation, but organized convection over the center is not happening. The only place significant convection is occurring is on the eastern and southeastern sections of the circulation. It's not quite enough to be classified as a depression.


But visible and IR shows the circulation covered, and there have been many TD's with exposed LLC's which this one doesn't have.


Yes I've seen MUCH worse looking TD's before.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L off Southeast U.S

#245 Postby senorpepr » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:22 pm

funster wrote:
senorpepr wrote:
curtadams wrote:Closed circulation with heavy convection near the center on Jacksonville radar. Looks like a TD to me now. In what way isn't it a TD?


Yes, it as a defined circulation, but organized convection over the center is not happening. The only place significant convection is occurring is on the eastern and southeastern sections of the circulation. It's not quite enough to be classified as a depression.


You don't need convection all the way around to be named. You just a center and strong enough winds in one quadrant.


Then where are the winds? The highest wind report is 20KT. Dvorak only supports 25KT. There's just not enough evidence to upgrade at this time and no justification to send recon in at this time.
0 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L off Southeast U.S

#246 Postby txwatcher91 » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:23 pm

How can you say the center is exposed when 10minute old visible shows the circulation completely covered, unless the center is over land. TD's dont't have to have 30kt winds, I have seen some at 20 and 25 before.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L off Southeast U.S

#247 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:23 pm

Just watched JB's update. Half of a 10 minute video about why the NHC should be calling this 94L a TD since yesterday, and some more on how he got the Southeast system when nobody else did.

His cone of uncertainty on 94L issued to his better paying clients yesterday shows 94L becoming a hurricane just before the Yucatan, with a landfall between Tampico and Brownsville, with the usual uncertainty area up to near Corpus Christi-ish area.

96L is a strong tropical storm or maybe a hurricane Sunday/Monday in Hatteras, and may swing close enough to New England to effect weather Tuesday.


Don't want to give more info than that, lest I violate a terms of service agreeement, and I offer no commentary on whether JB is correct or not, and while I do recall a few significant errors he has made, I also recall he basically called last year's Humberto 2 or 3 days before anyone else.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L off Southeast U.S

#248 Postby senorpepr » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:24 pm

Brent wrote:Yes I've seen MUCH worse looking TD's before.

But usually there's some sort of supporting evidence for that upgrade. In this case, there's not. They won't upgrade a T1.0 without any observations supporting something higher.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L off Southeast U.S

#249 Postby senorpepr » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:25 pm

txwatcher91 wrote:How can you say the center is exposed when 10minute old visible shows the circulation completely covered, unless the center is over land. TD's dont't have to have 30kt winds, I have seen some at 20 and 25 before.


I never remember seeing an initial advisory for 20KT. Maybe a final, but never an initial. I agree, you might see 25, but in this case, there's nothing to justify that.
0 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L off Southeast U.S

#250 Postby txwatcher91 » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:26 pm

senorpepr wrote:
txwatcher91 wrote:How can you say the center is exposed when 10minute old visible shows the circulation completely covered, unless the center is over land. TD's dont't have to have 30kt winds, I have seen some at 20 and 25 before.


I never remember seeing an initial advisory for 20KT. Maybe a final, but never an initial. I agree, you might see 25, but in this case, there's nothing to justify that.


But doesn't the NHC's definition of a TD say that an LLC and convection over the center is all that is needed? How do you know there isn't a small band of 30kt winds, radar shows some 50kt about 6,000 feet above the surface and I am sure some of that is working its way to the surface in the stronger bands.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#251 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:27 pm

I think this could be classified as a 25KT depression, Mike

We have a closed center now with organized, albiet poorly, convection on the eastern semi-circle

that said... a 25KT depression is not something worth getting all worked up about
0 likes   

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

#252 Postby curtadams » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:28 pm

I'll accept "winds aren't strong enough" as a reason not to upgrade. But if they need 25 kts for a TD, it should be part of the official definition.
0 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re:

#253 Postby txwatcher91 » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:29 pm

curtadams wrote:I'll accept "winds aren't strong enough" as a reason not to upgrade. But if they need 25 kts for a TD, it should be part of the official definition.


But isn't the definition a closed LLC and convection over the center for 24 or more hours?
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re:

#254 Postby senorpepr » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:31 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:I think this could be classified as a 25KT depression, Mike

We have a closed center now with organized, albiet poorly, convection on the eastern semi-circle

that said... a 25KT depression is not something worth getting all worked up about



I would agree, but I still don't see them actually upgrading it until either a) an observation better supports it or b) satellite pattern improves.
0 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: Re:

#255 Postby txwatcher91 » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:32 pm

senorpepr wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:I think this could be classified as a 25KT depression, Mike

We have a closed center now with organized, albiet poorly, convection on the eastern semi-circle

that said... a 25KT depression is not something worth getting all worked up about



I would agree, but I still don't see them actually upgrading it until either a) an observation better supports it or b) satellite pattern improves.


I don't see it being upgraded today, but the NHC can be inconsistent. However, I think one could argue that this is a TD right now, although a weak one.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38088
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re:

#256 Postby Brent » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:33 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:that said... a 25KT depression is not something worth getting all worked up about


That's true. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#257 Postby jasons2k » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:34 pm

Looking at the radar, to me it looks like we have a LLC, but further away (and the radar beam is higher) it looks like a MLC. The centers are not stacked yet, but they are getting closer. If one of the centers can take over then it can intensify, but it is still disorganized for now.
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L off Southeast U.S

#258 Postby fci » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:37 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:Just watched JB's update. Half of a 10 minute video about why the NHC should be calling this 94L a TD since yesterday, and some more on how he got the Southeast system when nobody else did.

His cone of uncertainty on 94L issued to his better paying clients yesterday shows 94L becoming a hurricane just before the Yucatan, with a landfall between Tampico and Brownsville, with the usual uncertainty area up to near Corpus Christi-ish area.

96L is a strong tropical storm or maybe a hurricane Sunday/Monday in Hatteras, and may swing close enough to New England to effect weather Tuesday.


Don't want to give more info than that, lest I violate a terms of service agreeement, and I offer no commentary on whether JB is correct or not, and while I do recall a few significant errors he has made, I also recall he basically called last year's Humberto 2 or 3 days before anyone else.



Ed:
Thanks for sharing this info.
I WISH people would stop looking for "credit" when the do their job.
No one should doubt any Pro who has the credientials but always looking for "credit" is so annoying to me.
PLEASE do not interpret this as bashing JB. I respect his knowledge but just wish the "I called it" comments would stop.
0 likes   

User avatar
hiflyer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 562
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 11:24 am
Location: West Broward Florida

#259 Postby hiflyer » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:39 pm

Air traffic starting to avoid the area...radar indicates tops now above 30k though cessna jet went over at 38 and a spirit is climbing above 38 (airbus-he can't go much higher)....rest are transiting west or east...mostly onshore east. Sigmet below says tops to 45....that is getting up there fairly early which suggests this is getting it's act together.....

WSUS31 KKCI 181655
SIGE
CONVECTIVE SIGMET 40E
VALID UNTIL 1855Z
SC FL GA CSTL WTRS
FROM 90SE CHS-160SE CHS-160E OMN-90NE OMN-90SE CHS
AREA EMBD TS MOV LTL. TOPS TO FL450.
0 likes   

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

Re: Re:

#260 Postby cpdaman » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:43 pm

Brent wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:that said... a 25KT depression is not something worth getting all worked up about


That's true. :lol:


of course it's not , but in recent memory we have seen storms surprise to the upside
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 6 guests