ATL: Tropical Depression Dolly

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#2461 Postby KWT » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:22 am

The one thing that is very evident to me is that way the convection is arched, you can clearly see at the very least there is a broad circulation with this system. You can also clearly see the inflow setting up though as others have said south America s currently severely limiting the inflow.

cheezyWXguy, that may well be the case I haven't really had a good look to be honest.

tolakram, its certainly possible though convection has been more impressive the n in recet days I have to admit.
Last edited by KWT on Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

miachele
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:36 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L in Central Caribbean

#2462 Postby miachele » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:22 am

We're going to be SOUTH of Cancun all next week (leaving Sunday).
Is 94L the only thing we need to be worried about - or is there something else lurking behind it out in the Atlantic?
Thanks... someone please answer... :wink: I've asked this a few times already.

I'm a mom leaving 3 kids behind for this vacation... this momma needs to get back home safe!

Thanks guys!
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145769
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L in Central Caribbean

#2463 Postby cycloneye » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:23 am

reformed further north.


That looks to be the case,but soon recon will find out.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L in Central Caribbean

#2464 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:24 am

cheezyWXguy wrote:
lrak wrote:
Ed Mahmoud wrote:What is the policy on Bones saying something is dead, when it was dead at the time and remained dead for at least 3 days afterwards?



I'm thinking we need a new graphic, when something has no shot for 3 or 4 days, but might eventually have a chance down the road. Something like "he/she/it is in a drug induced coma, Jim".

:D


Image

best I could do at work. When I get home I'll make a much better one. :D

I hope to impress Mr. Waxman57...I like doughnuts...hint hint.

cant see it...lol



From the URL, it appears to be from 'Young Frankenstein'.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23692
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L in Central Caribbean

#2465 Postby gatorcane » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:24 am

reminds me of Ernesto some....the ULL is inducing shear which is causing reformations of the center more north and hence possibly the ultimate track.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L in Central Caribbean

#2466 Postby cheezyWXguy » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:25 am

miachele wrote:We're going to be SOUTH of Cancun all next week (leaving Sunday).
Is 94L the only thing we need to be worried about - or is there something else lurking behind it out in the Atlantic?
Thanks... someone please answer... :wink: I've asked this a few times already.

I'm a mom leaving 3 kids behind for this vacation... this momma needs to get back home safe!

Thanks guys!

No, theres nothing behind it
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L in Central Caribbean

#2467 Postby Frank2 » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:27 am

The ULL to the NW is ventilating the wave, so, that's perhaps the reason for the flare-up this morning...

It still looks like a wave more than anything...

As Derek said, the ULL is going to make for some very hostile conditions...

Just remember that each season is unique unto itself...
0 likes   

wxsouth
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:57 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L in Central Caribbean

#2468 Postby wxsouth » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:29 am

The morning quickscat did NOT show a center over land. It shows a sharp trough extending north into the convection from the South American Coast. The low res version seem to allude to a sfc low near/on the coast...but the high res version clearly shows a sharp trough and no closed circulation.

My guess would be the main center will eventually form near the northern part of the trough...near 14N.

http://manati.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/dataimages21/cur_hires/zooms/WMBas88.png

Image
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L in Central Caribbean

#2469 Postby MiamiensisWx » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:30 am

The following post is NOT an official prognosis.

Firstly, land itself is not an issue for systems close to South America and other regions. It is an egregious assumption; many TCs have actually developed in the vicinity if the synoptic/thermodynamic environment favors tropical cyclogenesis at the time. The historical records and other sources suggest that development in this region is plausible, especially if the South American heat low is not a factor at the time.

Although additional convection has been developing throughout the morning, I strongly suspect that it is corrobated with strong divergence in the area and the unstable boundary layer, as I mentioned yesterday on another site. The divergence is contributing to significant ascent in the vicinity, resulting in continuous development of thunderstorms. The upper low to the NW over the southern Bahamas/Cuba at H3 has not "developed"; it has been present over the past several days, and it has been enhancing upper level divergence/shear over 94L. As I mentioned, this is clearly detrimental to 94L; 94L is not intensifying or deepening, but it is experiencing the effects of the upper low. Don't focus on the convection itself. On GOES IR loops, note that convection on the western flank is dissipating as the wave axis to the east moves west. The convection is dissipating because it is 1) "knocked down" at the tops by the strong upper level winds and 2) it is leaving the region of greatest ascent provided by the strong divergence. Note that the convection is continually developing in one location on IR just downstream of the strongest upper level divergence field. The greatest ascent is concentrated in this region. Here is a good tutorial for reference, which states that "the upper divergence usually DOES NOT create a localized ascent maximum concentrated directly under the upper-level divergence field."

It is clear that the upper low will continue to move SW into the W Caribbean Sea as progged by several models, which will likely serve as a lethal factor for 94L's development prospects in the short to medium term. Since 94L will clearly remain shallow, a track toward the Yucatan Peninsula and mainland Mexico is very probable, since 94L is associated with a west moving tropical wave axis. We would need a well defined LLC and a deeper system to even consider the northward solutions depicted by the GFDL, some BAM suites, and others; even if a deeper system occurred, the large upper ridge over mainland Mexico would likely still result in a westward turn toward that area well south of the CONUS. Regardless, 94L will very likely not develop in the end.
0 likes   

User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 58
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L in Central Caribbean

#2470 Postby lrak » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:30 am

can you hear me now? I mean see it now?
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145769
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L in Central Caribbean

#2471 Postby cycloneye » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:30 am

According to the latest SHIP forecast shear will not be a big problem.

Code: Select all

SHIPS INTENSITY FORECAST       *
                    *        GOES/OHC INPUT INCLUDED            *
                    *      INVEST  AL942008  07/18/08  12 UTC   *

TIME (HR)          0     6    12    18    24    36    48    60    72    84    96   108   120

SHEAR (KTS)       23    17    10    12    11    10    12     6     2     7     8     6    14
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L in Central Caribbean

#2472 Postby Sanibel » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:31 am

As Derek said, the ULL is going to make for some very hostile conditions...



The ULL appears to be pinched and pushed more east. This should let 94L get past it. 94L has enough momentum now to endure moderate ULL shear before entering the latent waters in the western Caribbean. I could be wrong.
0 likes   

User avatar
BigA
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L in Central Caribbean

#2473 Postby BigA » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:31 am

The above image looks like an almost closed circulation around 14 north, with a lot of fairly high wind vectors north of that.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#2474 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:32 am

I might have been wrong with this one...
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L in Central Caribbean

#2475 Postby MiamiensisWx » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:33 am

MiamiensisWx wrote:The following post is NOT an official prognosis.

Firstly, land itself is not an issue for systems close to South America and other regions. It is an egregious assumption; many TCs have actually developed in the vicinity if the synoptic/thermodynamic environment favors tropical cyclogenesis at the time. The historical records and other sources suggest that development in this region is plausible, especially if the South American heat low is not a factor at the time.

Although additional convection has been developing throughout the morning, I strongly suspect that it is corrobated with strong divergence in the area and the unstable boundary layer, as I mentioned yesterday on another site. The divergence is contributing to significant ascent in the vicinity, resulting in continuous development of thunderstorms. The upper low to the NW over the southern Bahamas/Cuba at H3 has not "developed"; it has been present over the past several days, and it has been enhancing upper level divergence/shear over 94L. As I mentioned, this is clearly detrimental to 94L; 94L is not intensifying or deepening, but it is experiencing the effects of the upper low. Don't focus on the convection itself. On GOES IR loops, note that convection on the western flank is dissipating as the wave axis to the east moves west. The convection is dissipating because it is 1) "knocked down" at the tops by the strong upper level winds and 2) it is leaving the region of greatest ascent provided by the strong divergence. Note that the convection is continually developing in one location on IR just downstream of the strongest upper level divergence field. The greatest ascent is concentrated in this region. Here is a good tutorial for reference, which states that "the upper divergence usually DOES NOT create a localized ascent maximum concentrated directly under the upper-level divergence field."

It is clear that the upper low will continue to move SW into the W Caribbean Sea as progged by several models, which will likely serve as a lethal factor for 94L's development prospects in the short to medium term. Since 94L will clearly remain shallow, a track toward the Yucatan Peninsula and mainland Mexico is very probable, since 94L is associated with a west moving tropical wave axis. We would need a well defined LLC and a deeper system to even consider the northward solutions depicted by the GFDL, some BAM suites, and others; even if a deeper system occurred, the large upper ridge over mainland Mexico would likely still result in a westward turn toward that area well south of the CONUS. Regardless, 94L will very likely not develop in the end.

...and the upper low over the S Bahamas is certainly not moving E. It is moving slowly SW.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/tatl/loop-wv.html
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4423
Age: 43
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

Re:

#2476 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:33 am

Derek Ortt wrote:I might have been wrong with this one...



Man you just killed everything Frank was living for today...LMAO
Last edited by DESTRUCTION5 on Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Javlin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1621
Age: 64
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 7:58 pm
Location: ms gulf coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L in Central Caribbean

#2477 Postby Javlin » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:34 am

If I am not mistaken an ULL needs to to the NE and SW of a system to enhance the outflow.The other Quads actually are pressing against the system.
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5277
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re:

#2478 Postby PTrackerLA » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:34 am

Derek Ortt wrote:I might have been wrong with this one...


So there's a bearded lady in the Ms. America pageant? :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15448
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#2479 Postby NDG » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:34 am

My guess is that the recon will find a closed low, might still be broad, with a developing LLC, with the SW quadrant still could be weak, though why QS might had not picked up the light NW winds that Aruba reported earlier this morning.
0 likes   

User avatar
Comanche
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 381
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:33 am
Location: Clear Lake City Texas

Re:

#2480 Postby Comanche » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:35 am

Derek Ortt wrote:I might have been wrong with this one...


care to elaborate?
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests