A jog to the north??
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
A jog to the north??
Seems Claudette has slowed and taken a slight jog to the north. Anyone verify that?
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22978
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Nope
Recon doesn't verify it. It's exceedingly difficult to estimate movement on a system that barely has a LLC using IR imagery. Recon says it's moving almost due west. You're just seeing spot flare-ups in convection that make it appear to jog north. Note that the center is exposed near the southwest side of that big ball of convection. Water vapor imagery suggests that the southerly shear is on the increase again, driving convection more north of the center. That's what you're seeing.
0 likes
What we may be seeing with Claudette and/or are seeing with Claudette can evolve into something more interesting. I have seen this with past storms over the years.
The center I estimated was several miles northeast of the 5:00 PM ET center and then the 8:00 PM ET position was 34 miles west of the 5:00 PM ET position.
The center I estimated was several miles northeast of the 5:00 PM ET center and then the 8:00 PM ET position was 34 miles west of the 5:00 PM ET position.
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22978
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
But..
The 5pm fix was via satellite, though, not recon. With the center not really visible on satellite, there could be large errors. I'm curious, ColdFront, what are you using to estimate the center to within a few miles? That would be more accurate than recon.
0 likes
The difference of the 5:00 PM Eastern position estimate of 16.0ºN 79.7ºW to the 8:00 PM Eastern position estimate of 16.1ºN 80.2ºW. The distance between these two positions is 34 miles. This puts the average speed between 11 and 12 miles per hour.
If this isn't movement, it obviously has to be a relocation of the center.
I have watched tropical systems do this over the years. It isn't that rare... this makes the future model runs (used as guidance), more interesting, as well.
If this isn't movement, it obviously has to be a relocation of the center.
I have watched tropical systems do this over the years. It isn't that rare... this makes the future model runs (used as guidance), more interesting, as well.
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
- Stormsfury
- Category 5
- Posts: 10549
- Age: 53
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
- Location: Summerville, SC
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22978
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
No, It Hasn't Slowed Much
No, it hasn't slowed much. My point was that the 5pm position was probably in error as it was satellite-estimated. You could be easily off 20-30 miles using satellite on a system with a barely discernable center. Distance between the 00Z position and 03Z was about 55 miles, indicating about 18 kts. These postions had recon support, so they are probably more correct.
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: sasha_B and 43 guests