
18z GFS loop
Moderator: S2k Moderators
MiamiensisWx wrote:In regards to the model run posted by Recurve, the grid and isobaric analysis depicts the mean sea level pressures at the low levels. In other words, it displays features such as surface ridges, surface troughs, et al. The model indicates a northward turn because of a weakness at the mid and upper levels, which are not displayed on that particular chart. There is a deepening shotwave with intensifying upper level wind vectors (winds) from the southwest, which are resulting in a deepening (intensification) of the baroclinic low over the North Atlantic. At the surface, a trailing cold front is developing (frontogenesis; formation of a front) as the low deepens. The trough at the mid to upper levels is eroding the Azores ridge (at the mid and upper levels), while the cold front at the lower levels is also weakening the ridging at the lower levels. This is resulting in the northward turn depicted by the model. Additionally, the upper low that is currently NE of the Leeward Islands may be another factor for the northward movement as well.
In regards to the intensity, those +50 kt surface winds indicate the system is a TS in the model. It is NOT a depression, contrary to your post. However, as mentioned, the higher ambient pressures and pressure gradient are contributing to the stronger winds, despite an anomalously high central pressure in the lower 1000s. The small size of the TC is another factor that supports those higher winds, as opposed to a larger TC that is also recurving at that latitude.
Did I help, Dave?
Miami
ekal wrote:I'll show you something else. For a system that is forecast to be a TS or stronger, it is often better to look at the model output for 500mb, instead of at the surface, since deeper systems tend to be steered at the mid-levels, not the lower-levels. This is the 12z 500mb output from the GFS today.
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml
Code: Select all
* ATLANTIC SHIPS INTENSITY FORECAST *
* GOES AND/OR OHC INPUT MISSING *
* INVEST AL922008 07/03/08 00 UTC *
TIME (HR) 0 6 12 18 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
V (KT) NO LAND 25 27 30 33 38 45 52 61 66 69 71 72 71
V (KT) LAND 25 27 30 33 38 45 52 61 66 69 71 72 71
V (KT) LGE mod 25 26 26 28 29 34 39 44 51 57 62 65 66
SHEAR (KTS) 5 2 3 5 6 6 6 4 8 7 9 11 13
SHEAR DIR 134 158 175 175 204 305 310 319 157 204 183 236 221
SST (C) 26.8 26.1 25.5 25.4 25.5 25.1 24.8 25.0 25.3 25.6 25.9 26.3 26.4
POT. INT. (KT) 122 116 111 110 111 108 105 107 109 112 114 116 117
ADJ. POT. INT. 118 115 109 108 110 105 101 103 104 106 106 105 104
200 MB T (C) -53.8 -53.9 -53.6 -53.0 -53.5 -53.9 -53.6 -54.0 -53.5 -53.8 -53.6 -54.0 -53.7
TH_E DEV (C) 4 4 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 6 7 7 7
700-500 MB RH 82 79 75 75 74 73 62 61 55 49 48 45 46
GFS VTEX (KT) 15 16 18 18 20 20 18 19 18 17 17 18 18
850 MB ENV VOR 61 55 58 78 98 115 133 139 129 96 72 43 11
200 MB DIV 92 105 86 79 75 54 51 41 23 31 61 39 24
LAND (KM) 532 639 754 904 1058 1407 1718 2020 2016 1920 1924 2005 2143
LAT (DEG N) 12.1 12.7 13.2 13.6 14.0 14.8 15.6 16.5 17.6 18.7 20.3 21.8 23.5
LONG(DEG W) 21.7 23.0 24.3 25.8 27.3 30.6 33.5 36.3 39.0 41.8 44.2 45.6 45.8
STM SPEED (KT) 10 14 14 15 16 16 14 14 14 14 12 9 8
HEAT CONTENT 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5
FORECAST TRACK FROM BAMM INITIAL HEADING/SPEED (DEG/KT):275/ 8 CX,CY: -7/ 1
T-12 MAX WIND: 25 PRESSURE OF STEERING LEVEL (MB): 594 (MEAN=625)
GOES IR BRIGHTNESS TEMP. STD DEV. 100-300 KM RAD: -99.0 (MEAN=20.0)
% GOES IR PIXELS WITH T < -20 C 50-200 KM RAD: -99.0 (MEAN=68.6)
INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO INTENSITY CHANGE
6 12 18 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
----------------------------------------------------------
SAMPLE MEAN CHANGE 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 12. 13.
SST POTENTIAL 0. 0. 0. 0. 2. 5. 9. 13. 16. 19. 20. 22.
VERTICAL SHEAR 1. 3. 5. 6. 9. 11. 14. 15. 15. 15. 15. 14.
PERSISTENCE 0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. 0. 0.
200/250 MB TEMP. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 1.
THETA_E EXCESS -1. -1. -2. -3. -4. -5. -7. -9. -11. -12. -13. -13.
700-500 MB RH 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. -1. -2.
GFS VORTEX TENDENCY 0. 1. 1. 2. 2. 1. 2. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0.
850 MB ENV VORTICITY 0. 0. 1. 1. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 7. 7. 7.
200 MB DIVERGENCE 1. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 6. 6. 6. 7. 6.
ZONAL STORM MOTION 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1.
STEERING LEVEL PRES 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 0. 0. 0.
DAYS FROM CLIM. PEAK 0. 0. 0. -1. -1. -2. -2. -2. -3. -3. -3. -4.
----------------------------------------------------------
SUB-TOTAL CHANGE 2. 5. 8. 13. 20. 27. 36. 41. 44. 46. 47. 46.
SATELLITE ADJUSTMENTS ----------------------------------------------------------
MEAN ADJUSTMENT 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
GOES IR STD DEV 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
GOES IR PIXEL COUNT 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
OCEAN HEAT CONTENT 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
----------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL ADJUSTMENT 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
----------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL CHANGE (KT) 2. 5. 8. 13. 20. 27. 36. 41. 44. 46. 47. 46.
** 2008 ATLANTIC RI INDEX AL922008 INVEST 07/03/08 00 UTC **
( 25 KT OR MORE MAX WIND INCREASE IN NEXT 24 HR)
12 HR PERSISTENCE (KT): 0.0 Range:-45.0 to 30.0 Scaled/Wgted Val: 0.6/ 1.1
850-200 MB SHEAR (KT) : 4.4 Range: 35.1 to 3.2 Scaled/Wgted Val: 1.0/ 1.5
D200 (10**7s-1) : 87.4 Range:-20.0 to 149.0 Scaled/Wgted Val: 0.6/ 0.9
POT = MPI-VMAX (KT) : 87.1 Range: 25.1 to 130.7 Scaled/Wgted Val: 0.6/ 0.7
850-700 MB REL HUM (%): 76.8 Range: 56.0 to 88.0 Scaled/Wgted Val: 0.6/ 0.3
% area w/pixels <-30 C:9999.0 Range: 17.0 to 100.0 Scaled/Wgted Val:999.0/999.0
STD DEV OF IR BR TEMP : 999.9 Range: 35.1 to 3.2 Scaled/Wgted Val:999.0/999.0
Heat content (KJ/cm2) : 1.0 Range: 0.0 to 132.0 Scaled/Wgted Val: 0.0/ 0.0
Prob of RI for 25 kt RI threshold= 999% is 999.0 times the sample mean(12.3%)
Prob of RI for 30 kt RI threshold= 999% is 999.0 times the sample mean( 7.8%)
Prob of RI for 35 kt RI threshold= 999% is 999.0 times the sample mean( 4.5%)
Extremeweatherguy wrote:
Exactly my thoughts. If the ridge doesn't break down like the CMC is showing at the very end of the run, then this storm could wind up getting dangerously close to the islands. Hopefully the CMC is wrong with its due W/WNW motion for the next few days.gatorcane wrote:Note the CMC actually pushes this thing due West for quite some time before it makes a WNW to NW turn...a little too close for comfort for the Caribbean islands (NE Leewards)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests